Cargando…

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer with mixed-type histology: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a primary treatment for the early gastric cancer (EGC) who have a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis satisfying specific criteria. These criteria are histologically categorized by EGC with differentiated-type histology (EGC-DH) and undiffer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bang, Chang Seok, Choi, Jae Ho, Yang, Young Joo, Lee, Jae Jun, Baik, Gwang Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013838
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a primary treatment for the early gastric cancer (EGC) who have a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis satisfying specific criteria. These criteria are histologically categorized by EGC with differentiated-type histology (EGC-DH) and undifferentiated-type histology (EGC-UH). However, gastric cancer is histologically heterogenous and there has been no specific criteria for EGC with mixed-type histology (EGC-MH). Moreover, therapeutic outcomes of ESD for EGC-MH have not been clearly described. METHODS: We will search the core databases (MEDLINE (through PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and Embase) from their inception to November 2018 using pre-established searching strategy by 2 independent evaluators. The P.I.C.O. is as follows; Patients: who have EGC-MH, Intervention: ESD, Comparison: none, Outcome: at least one among the rate of complete resection, curative resection, en bloc resection, recurrence or procedure-related adverse event that enabled an evaluation of feasibility of ESD. All types of study design will be sought and publications in English with full-text will be included. The risk of bias will be assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Descriptive data synthesis is planned and quantitative synthesis will be used if the included studies are sufficiently homogenous (pooled therapeutic outcomes data with 95% confidence intervals). Publication bias will be assessed with quantitative analyses if more than 10 articles are enrolled. RESULTS: The results will provide evidence for validity of current ESD criteria in addition to the technical feasibility of ESD for EGC-MH. CONCLUSION: This study will provide evidence of ESD for EGC-MH.