Cargando…

Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs

Mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells is part of the standard treatment procedure for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Mobilization is usually achieved with chemotherapy and/or cytokines, but plerixafo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hübel, Kai, Ostermann, H., Glaß, Bertram, Noppeney, Richard, Kron, Florian, Kron, Anna, Milkovich, Gary, Mohty, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z
_version_ 1783385205349810176
author Hübel, Kai
Ostermann, H.
Glaß, Bertram
Noppeney, Richard
Kron, Florian
Kron, Anna
Milkovich, Gary
Mohty, Mohamad
author_facet Hübel, Kai
Ostermann, H.
Glaß, Bertram
Noppeney, Richard
Kron, Florian
Kron, Anna
Milkovich, Gary
Mohty, Mohamad
author_sort Hübel, Kai
collection PubMed
description Mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells is part of the standard treatment procedure for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Mobilization is usually achieved with chemotherapy and/or cytokines, but plerixafor might be added in case of poor mobilization. Due to the high cost several institutions have developed their own management pathway to optimize use of plerixafor. Such models are however rarely generalizable; in a multi-center, European, non-interventional study, evaluating the impact of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, country specific differences in patient treatment and cost structure were obvious. For German centers, there was a non-significant reduction in the number of apheresis sessions carried out and in apheresis costs. In contrast to other European countries the majority of German Plerixafor patients were very poor mobilizing patients with initial CD34+ cell count ≤ 10/µl (40/51). In this group the number of apheresis sessions decreased from 2.1 to 1.6 sessions per patient (p = 0.01) and costs decreased from €6246 to €4758 (p = 0.01). Our results show that preemptive plerixafor use has a strong effect in poor mobilizers with an initial CD34+ cell count ≤ 10 cells/µl.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6320344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63203442019-01-07 Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs Hübel, Kai Ostermann, H. Glaß, Bertram Noppeney, Richard Kron, Florian Kron, Anna Milkovich, Gary Mohty, Mohamad Bone Marrow Transplant Article Mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells is part of the standard treatment procedure for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Mobilization is usually achieved with chemotherapy and/or cytokines, but plerixafor might be added in case of poor mobilization. Due to the high cost several institutions have developed their own management pathway to optimize use of plerixafor. Such models are however rarely generalizable; in a multi-center, European, non-interventional study, evaluating the impact of plerixafor in poor mobilizers, country specific differences in patient treatment and cost structure were obvious. For German centers, there was a non-significant reduction in the number of apheresis sessions carried out and in apheresis costs. In contrast to other European countries the majority of German Plerixafor patients were very poor mobilizing patients with initial CD34+ cell count ≤ 10/µl (40/51). In this group the number of apheresis sessions decreased from 2.1 to 1.6 sessions per patient (p = 0.01) and costs decreased from €6246 to €4758 (p = 0.01). Our results show that preemptive plerixafor use has a strong effect in poor mobilizers with an initial CD34+ cell count ≤ 10 cells/µl. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6320344/ /pubmed/29795422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hübel, Kai
Ostermann, H.
Glaß, Bertram
Noppeney, Richard
Kron, Florian
Kron, Anna
Milkovich, Gary
Mohty, Mohamad
Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs
title Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs
title_full Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs
title_fullStr Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs
title_full_unstemmed Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs
title_short Plerixafor in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a German analysis of time, effort and costs
title_sort plerixafor in non-hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a german analysis of time, effort and costs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29795422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0228-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hubelkai plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT ostermannh plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT glaßbertram plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT noppeneyrichard plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT kronflorian plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT kronanna plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT milkovichgary plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts
AT mohtymohamad plerixaforinnonhodgkinslymphomapatientsagermananalysisoftimeeffortandcosts