Cargando…

Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a wealth of information that can support data-driven decision making in health care policy design and service planning. Although research using EMRs has become increasingly prevalent, challenges such as coding inconsistency, data validity, and la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahman, Nabilah, Wang, Debby D, Ng, Sheryl Hui-Xian, Ramachandran, Sravan, Sridharan, Srinath, Khoo, Astrid, Tan, Chuen Seng, Goh, Wei-Ping, Tan, Xin Quan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10933
_version_ 1783385223402094592
author Rahman, Nabilah
Wang, Debby D
Ng, Sheryl Hui-Xian
Ramachandran, Sravan
Sridharan, Srinath
Khoo, Astrid
Tan, Chuen Seng
Goh, Wei-Ping
Tan, Xin Quan
author_facet Rahman, Nabilah
Wang, Debby D
Ng, Sheryl Hui-Xian
Ramachandran, Sravan
Sridharan, Srinath
Khoo, Astrid
Tan, Chuen Seng
Goh, Wei-Ping
Tan, Xin Quan
author_sort Rahman, Nabilah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a wealth of information that can support data-driven decision making in health care policy design and service planning. Although research using EMRs has become increasingly prevalent, challenges such as coding inconsistency, data validity, and lack of suitable measures in important domains still hinder the progress. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to design a structured way to process records in administrative EMR systems for health services research and assess validity in selected areas. METHODS: On the basis of a local hospital EMR system in Singapore, we developed a structured framework for EMR data processing, including standardization and phenotyping of diagnosis codes, construction of cohort with multilevel views, and generation of variables and proxy measures to supplement primary data. Disease complexity was estimated by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Polypharmacy Score (PPS), whereas socioeconomic status (SES) was estimated by housing type. Validity of modified diagnosis codes and derived measures were investigated. RESULTS: Visit-level (N=7,778,761) and patient-level records (n=549,109) were generated. The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) codes were standardized to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) with a mapping rate of 87.1%. In all, 97.4% of the ICD-9-CM codes were phenotyped successfully using Clinical Classification Software by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Diagnosis codes that underwent modification (truncation or zero addition) in standardization and phenotyping procedures had the modification validated by physicians, with validity rates of more than 90%. Disease complexity measures (CCI and PPS) and SES were found to be valid and robust after a correlation analysis and a multivariate regression analysis. CCI and PPS were correlated with each other and positively correlated with health care utilization measures. Larger housing type was associated with lower government subsidies received, suggesting association with higher SES. Profile of constructed cohorts showed differences in disease prevalence, disease complexity, and health care utilization in those aged above 65 years and those aged 65 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS: The framework proposed in this study would be useful for other researchers working with EMR data for health services research. Further analyses would be needed to better understand differences observed in the cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6320424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63204242019-01-28 Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation Rahman, Nabilah Wang, Debby D Ng, Sheryl Hui-Xian Ramachandran, Sravan Sridharan, Srinath Khoo, Astrid Tan, Chuen Seng Goh, Wei-Ping Tan, Xin Quan JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a wealth of information that can support data-driven decision making in health care policy design and service planning. Although research using EMRs has become increasingly prevalent, challenges such as coding inconsistency, data validity, and lack of suitable measures in important domains still hinder the progress. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to design a structured way to process records in administrative EMR systems for health services research and assess validity in selected areas. METHODS: On the basis of a local hospital EMR system in Singapore, we developed a structured framework for EMR data processing, including standardization and phenotyping of diagnosis codes, construction of cohort with multilevel views, and generation of variables and proxy measures to supplement primary data. Disease complexity was estimated by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Polypharmacy Score (PPS), whereas socioeconomic status (SES) was estimated by housing type. Validity of modified diagnosis codes and derived measures were investigated. RESULTS: Visit-level (N=7,778,761) and patient-level records (n=549,109) were generated. The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) codes were standardized to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) with a mapping rate of 87.1%. In all, 97.4% of the ICD-9-CM codes were phenotyped successfully using Clinical Classification Software by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Diagnosis codes that underwent modification (truncation or zero addition) in standardization and phenotyping procedures had the modification validated by physicians, with validity rates of more than 90%. Disease complexity measures (CCI and PPS) and SES were found to be valid and robust after a correlation analysis and a multivariate regression analysis. CCI and PPS were correlated with each other and positively correlated with health care utilization measures. Larger housing type was associated with lower government subsidies received, suggesting association with higher SES. Profile of constructed cohorts showed differences in disease prevalence, disease complexity, and health care utilization in those aged above 65 years and those aged 65 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS: The framework proposed in this study would be useful for other researchers working with EMR data for health services research. Further analyses would be needed to better understand differences observed in the cohorts. JMIR Publications 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6320424/ /pubmed/30578188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10933 Text en ©Nabilah Rahman, Debby D Wang, Sheryl Hui-Xian Ng, Sravan Ramachandran, Srinath Sridharan, Astrid Khoo, Chuen Seng Tan, Wei-Ping Goh, Xin Quan Tan. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 21.12.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rahman, Nabilah
Wang, Debby D
Ng, Sheryl Hui-Xian
Ramachandran, Sravan
Sridharan, Srinath
Khoo, Astrid
Tan, Chuen Seng
Goh, Wei-Ping
Tan, Xin Quan
Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation
title Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation
title_full Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation
title_fullStr Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation
title_full_unstemmed Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation
title_short Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation
title_sort processing of electronic medical records for health services research in an academic medical center: methods and validation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10933
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmannabilah processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT wangdebbyd processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT ngsherylhuixian processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT ramachandransravan processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT sridharansrinath processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT khooastrid processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT tanchuenseng processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT gohweiping processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation
AT tanxinquan processingofelectronicmedicalrecordsforhealthservicesresearchinanacademicmedicalcentermethodsandvalidation