Cargando…
“Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
BACKGROUND: Functional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30611242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2 |
_version_ | 1783385250613690368 |
---|---|
author | Benaim, Charles Blaser, Simon Léger, Bertrand Vuistiner, Philippe Luthi, François |
author_facet | Benaim, Charles Blaser, Simon Léger, Bertrand Vuistiner, Philippe Luthi, François |
author_sort | Benaim, Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Functional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the sit-to-stand test (STS), the Jamar dynamometer test (JAM) and the lumbar Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation center. Patients with upper-limb, lower-limb or neck/back lesions were included over a period of 21 months. We used the anchor-based method as a reference method, supplemented by the distribution-based and opinion-based approaches, to determine the MCIDs. RESULTS: 838 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients were included. The estimation method and thelesion location had a significant influence on the results. MCIDs were estimated at +75m and +60m for the 6MWT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions, respectively), +18 steps for the 1MSCT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions) and +6kg for the JAM (upper limb lesions). The anchor-based method could not provide valid estimations for the three other scales, but distribution and opinion-based methods provided rough values of MCIDs for the SRT (+39w to +61w), the STS (-5 sec to -7 sec) and the PILE (+4kg to +7kg). CONCLUSION: The above MCID estimations for the 6MWT, 1MSCT and JAM can be used in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients participating in vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs or in therapeutic trials. The use of specific anchors might give better estimations of MCIDs for the three other scales in future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6320580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63205802019-01-08 “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program Benaim, Charles Blaser, Simon Léger, Bertrand Vuistiner, Philippe Luthi, François BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Functional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the sit-to-stand test (STS), the Jamar dynamometer test (JAM) and the lumbar Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation center. Patients with upper-limb, lower-limb or neck/back lesions were included over a period of 21 months. We used the anchor-based method as a reference method, supplemented by the distribution-based and opinion-based approaches, to determine the MCIDs. RESULTS: 838 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients were included. The estimation method and thelesion location had a significant influence on the results. MCIDs were estimated at +75m and +60m for the 6MWT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions, respectively), +18 steps for the 1MSCT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions) and +6kg for the JAM (upper limb lesions). The anchor-based method could not provide valid estimations for the three other scales, but distribution and opinion-based methods provided rough values of MCIDs for the SRT (+39w to +61w), the STS (-5 sec to -7 sec) and the PILE (+4kg to +7kg). CONCLUSION: The above MCID estimations for the 6MWT, 1MSCT and JAM can be used in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients participating in vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs or in therapeutic trials. The use of specific anchors might give better estimations of MCIDs for the three other scales in future research. BioMed Central 2019-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6320580/ /pubmed/30611242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Benaim, Charles Blaser, Simon Léger, Bertrand Vuistiner, Philippe Luthi, François “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
title | “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
title_full | “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
title_fullStr | “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
title_full_unstemmed | “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
title_short | “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
title_sort | “minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30611242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benaimcharles minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram AT blasersimon minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram AT legerbertrand minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram AT vuistinerphilippe minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram AT luthifrancois minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram |