Cargando…

“Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

BACKGROUND: Functional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benaim, Charles, Blaser, Simon, Léger, Bertrand, Vuistiner, Philippe, Luthi, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30611242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2
_version_ 1783385250613690368
author Benaim, Charles
Blaser, Simon
Léger, Bertrand
Vuistiner, Philippe
Luthi, François
author_facet Benaim, Charles
Blaser, Simon
Léger, Bertrand
Vuistiner, Philippe
Luthi, François
author_sort Benaim, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the sit-to-stand test (STS), the Jamar dynamometer test (JAM) and the lumbar Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation center. Patients with upper-limb, lower-limb or neck/back lesions were included over a period of 21 months. We used the anchor-based method as a reference method, supplemented by the distribution-based and opinion-based approaches, to determine the MCIDs. RESULTS: 838 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients were included. The estimation method and thelesion location had a significant influence on the results. MCIDs were estimated at +75m and +60m for the 6MWT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions, respectively), +18 steps for the 1MSCT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions) and +6kg for the JAM (upper limb lesions). The anchor-based method could not provide valid estimations for the three other scales, but distribution and opinion-based methods provided rough values of MCIDs for the SRT (+39w to +61w), the STS (-5 sec to -7 sec) and the PILE (+4kg to +7kg). CONCLUSION: The above MCID estimations for the 6MWT, 1MSCT and JAM can be used in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients participating in vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs or in therapeutic trials. The use of specific anchors might give better estimations of MCIDs for the three other scales in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6320580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63205802019-01-08 “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program Benaim, Charles Blaser, Simon Léger, Bertrand Vuistiner, Philippe Luthi, François BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Functional tests are widely used to measure performance in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our objective was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Steep Ramp Test (SRT), the 1-min stair climbing test (1MSCT), the sit-to-stand test (STS), the Jamar dynamometer test (JAM) and the lumbar Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation center. Patients with upper-limb, lower-limb or neck/back lesions were included over a period of 21 months. We used the anchor-based method as a reference method, supplemented by the distribution-based and opinion-based approaches, to determine the MCIDs. RESULTS: 838 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients were included. The estimation method and thelesion location had a significant influence on the results. MCIDs were estimated at +75m and +60m for the 6MWT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions, respectively), +18 steps for the 1MSCT (lower-limb and neck/back lesions) and +6kg for the JAM (upper limb lesions). The anchor-based method could not provide valid estimations for the three other scales, but distribution and opinion-based methods provided rough values of MCIDs for the SRT (+39w to +61w), the STS (-5 sec to -7 sec) and the PILE (+4kg to +7kg). CONCLUSION: The above MCID estimations for the 6MWT, 1MSCT and JAM can be used in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients participating in vocational multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs or in therapeutic trials. The use of specific anchors might give better estimations of MCIDs for the three other scales in future research. BioMed Central 2019-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6320580/ /pubmed/30611242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benaim, Charles
Blaser, Simon
Léger, Bertrand
Vuistiner, Philippe
Luthi, François
“Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
title “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
title_full “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
title_fullStr “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
title_full_unstemmed “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
title_short “Minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
title_sort “minimal clinically important difference” estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6320580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30611242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2
work_keys_str_mv AT benaimcharles minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram
AT blasersimon minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram
AT legerbertrand minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram
AT vuistinerphilippe minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram
AT luthifrancois minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceestimatesof6commonlyusedperformancetestsinpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpaincompletingaworkrelatedmultidisciplinaryrehabilitationprogram