Cargando…

Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy

Background: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a serological assessment of gastric cancer risk in patients undergoing colonoscopy in countries with low-to-moderate incidence rates. Methods: Serum samples were prospectively collected from 453 patients (>50 years old) undergoing colonoscopi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selgrad, Michael, Bornschein, Jan, Kandulski, Arne, Weigt, Jochen, Roessner, Albert, Wex, Thomas, Malfertheiner, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123854
_version_ 1783385437987930112
author Selgrad, Michael
Bornschein, Jan
Kandulski, Arne
Weigt, Jochen
Roessner, Albert
Wex, Thomas
Malfertheiner, Peter
author_facet Selgrad, Michael
Bornschein, Jan
Kandulski, Arne
Weigt, Jochen
Roessner, Albert
Wex, Thomas
Malfertheiner, Peter
author_sort Selgrad, Michael
collection PubMed
description Background: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a serological assessment of gastric cancer risk in patients undergoing colonoscopy in countries with low-to-moderate incidence rates. Methods: Serum samples were prospectively collected from 453 patients (>50 years old) undergoing colonoscopies. Of these, 279 (61.6%) also underwent gastroscopy to correlate the results for serum pepsinogen I and II (sPG-I and sPG-II), sPG-I/II ratio, and anti-H. pylori antibodies with gastric histopathology findings (graded according to the updated Sydney classification and the Operative Link of Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and the Operative Link for Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) systems). Results: H. pylori was found in 85 patients (30.5%). Chronic atrophic gastritis was diagnosed in 89 (31.9%) patients. High-risk OLGA (III–IV) stages were present in 24 patients, and high-risk OLGIM stages were present in 14 patients. There was an inverse correlation of sPG-I with the degree of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (IM), as well as with the respective OLGA (r = −0.425; p < 0.001) and OLGIM (r = −0.303; p < 0.001) stages. A pathological sPG-I result was associated with a relative risk (RR) of 12.2 (95% confidence interval: 6.29–23.54; p < 0.001) for gastric preneoplastic changes. Conclusions: The assessment of serum pepsinogen allows the identification of patients at increased risk of gastric cancer. A prevention strategy of combining a screening colonoscopy with a serological screening for preneoplastic gastric changes should be considered in the general population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6321419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63214192019-01-07 Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy Selgrad, Michael Bornschein, Jan Kandulski, Arne Weigt, Jochen Roessner, Albert Wex, Thomas Malfertheiner, Peter Int J Mol Sci Article Background: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a serological assessment of gastric cancer risk in patients undergoing colonoscopy in countries with low-to-moderate incidence rates. Methods: Serum samples were prospectively collected from 453 patients (>50 years old) undergoing colonoscopies. Of these, 279 (61.6%) also underwent gastroscopy to correlate the results for serum pepsinogen I and II (sPG-I and sPG-II), sPG-I/II ratio, and anti-H. pylori antibodies with gastric histopathology findings (graded according to the updated Sydney classification and the Operative Link of Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and the Operative Link for Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) systems). Results: H. pylori was found in 85 patients (30.5%). Chronic atrophic gastritis was diagnosed in 89 (31.9%) patients. High-risk OLGA (III–IV) stages were present in 24 patients, and high-risk OLGIM stages were present in 14 patients. There was an inverse correlation of sPG-I with the degree of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (IM), as well as with the respective OLGA (r = −0.425; p < 0.001) and OLGIM (r = −0.303; p < 0.001) stages. A pathological sPG-I result was associated with a relative risk (RR) of 12.2 (95% confidence interval: 6.29–23.54; p < 0.001) for gastric preneoplastic changes. Conclusions: The assessment of serum pepsinogen allows the identification of patients at increased risk of gastric cancer. A prevention strategy of combining a screening colonoscopy with a serological screening for preneoplastic gastric changes should be considered in the general population. MDPI 2018-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6321419/ /pubmed/30513960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123854 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Selgrad, Michael
Bornschein, Jan
Kandulski, Arne
Weigt, Jochen
Roessner, Albert
Wex, Thomas
Malfertheiner, Peter
Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy
title Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy
title_full Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy
title_fullStr Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy
title_short Combined Gastric and Colorectal Cancer Screening—A New Strategy
title_sort combined gastric and colorectal cancer screening—a new strategy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123854
work_keys_str_mv AT selgradmichael combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy
AT bornscheinjan combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy
AT kandulskiarne combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy
AT weigtjochen combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy
AT roessneralbert combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy
AT wexthomas combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy
AT malfertheinerpeter combinedgastricandcolorectalcancerscreeninganewstrategy