Cargando…
Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes
BACKGROUND: This study investigated objective and patient-reported esthetic outcomes and their correlation for single-tooth implant restorations in the maxillary anterior region. METHODS: Nineteen patients were included. Gingival biotypes and smile lines were evaluated. Esthetic evaluation was perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3 |
_version_ | 1783385522436046848 |
---|---|
author | Altay, Mehmet Ali Sindel, Alper Tezerişener, Hüseyin Alican Yıldırımyan, Nelli Özarslan, Mehmet Mustafa |
author_facet | Altay, Mehmet Ali Sindel, Alper Tezerişener, Hüseyin Alican Yıldırımyan, Nelli Özarslan, Mehmet Mustafa |
author_sort | Altay, Mehmet Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study investigated objective and patient-reported esthetic outcomes and their correlation for single-tooth implant restorations in the maxillary anterior region. METHODS: Nineteen patients were included. Gingival biotypes and smile lines were evaluated. Esthetic evaluation was performed according to the pink and white esthetic scores (PES and WES). Patients rated their satisfaction regarding the implant treatment using a subjective outcome questionnaire and a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean PES and WES were 10.7 (range 5–13, SD ± 2.24) and 8.6 (range 8–10, SD ± 0.60), respectively. The overall mean VAS was 8.54 ± 0.36 (range 3.8–9.8). No significant correlation was found between VAS and PES or WES (p = 0.475, p = 0.984, respectively). PES and WES scores for gingival biotypes failed to show any statistically significant difference (p = 0.701, p = 0.831). There was a significant negative correlation between the smile line and VAS; indicating that patients with lower smile lines expressed higher patient satisfaction (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Professionally reported esthetic outcomes (PES and WES results) may not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. Smile line is a significant factor in patient satisfaction, which should be evaluated thoroughly prior to implant placement in the anterior maxilla. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6321832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63218322019-01-22 Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes Altay, Mehmet Ali Sindel, Alper Tezerişener, Hüseyin Alican Yıldırımyan, Nelli Özarslan, Mehmet Mustafa Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: This study investigated objective and patient-reported esthetic outcomes and their correlation for single-tooth implant restorations in the maxillary anterior region. METHODS: Nineteen patients were included. Gingival biotypes and smile lines were evaluated. Esthetic evaluation was performed according to the pink and white esthetic scores (PES and WES). Patients rated their satisfaction regarding the implant treatment using a subjective outcome questionnaire and a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean PES and WES were 10.7 (range 5–13, SD ± 2.24) and 8.6 (range 8–10, SD ± 0.60), respectively. The overall mean VAS was 8.54 ± 0.36 (range 3.8–9.8). No significant correlation was found between VAS and PES or WES (p = 0.475, p = 0.984, respectively). PES and WES scores for gingival biotypes failed to show any statistically significant difference (p = 0.701, p = 0.831). There was a significant negative correlation between the smile line and VAS; indicating that patients with lower smile lines expressed higher patient satisfaction (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Professionally reported esthetic outcomes (PES and WES results) may not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. Smile line is a significant factor in patient satisfaction, which should be evaluated thoroughly prior to implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6321832/ /pubmed/30613918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Altay, Mehmet Ali Sindel, Alper Tezerişener, Hüseyin Alican Yıldırımyan, Nelli Özarslan, Mehmet Mustafa Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
title | Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
title_full | Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
title_fullStr | Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
title_short | Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
title_sort | esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altaymehmetali estheticevaluationofimplantsupportedsinglecrownsacomparisonofobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomes AT sindelalper estheticevaluationofimplantsupportedsinglecrownsacomparisonofobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomes AT tezerisenerhuseyinalican estheticevaluationofimplantsupportedsinglecrownsacomparisonofobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomes AT yıldırımyannelli estheticevaluationofimplantsupportedsinglecrownsacomparisonofobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomes AT ozarslanmehmetmustafa estheticevaluationofimplantsupportedsinglecrownsacomparisonofobjectiveandpatientreportedoutcomes |