Cargando…

Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population

BACKGROUND: There are few large studies of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence and the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) responsible for TDR in the United States. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease sequences were obtained from 4253 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhee, Soo-Yon, Clutter, Dana, Fessel, W Jeffrey, Klein, Daniel, Slome, Sally, Pinsky, Benjamin A, Marcus, Julia L, Hurley, Leo, Silverberg, Michael J, Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L, Shafer, Robert W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy453
_version_ 1783385525936193536
author Rhee, Soo-Yon
Clutter, Dana
Fessel, W Jeffrey
Klein, Daniel
Slome, Sally
Pinsky, Benjamin A
Marcus, Julia L
Hurley, Leo
Silverberg, Michael J
Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
Shafer, Robert W
author_facet Rhee, Soo-Yon
Clutter, Dana
Fessel, W Jeffrey
Klein, Daniel
Slome, Sally
Pinsky, Benjamin A
Marcus, Julia L
Hurley, Leo
Silverberg, Michael J
Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
Shafer, Robert W
author_sort Rhee, Soo-Yon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are few large studies of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence and the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) responsible for TDR in the United States. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease sequences were obtained from 4253 antiretroviral therapy (ART)–naive individuals in a California clinic population from 2003 to 2016. Phylogenetic analyses were performed to study linkages between TDR strains and selection pressure on TDR-associated DRMs. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2016, there was a significant increase in overall (odds ratio [OR], 1.05 per year [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03–1.08]; P < .001) and nonnucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI)–associated TDR (OR, 1.11 per year [95% CI, 1.08–1.15]; P < .001). Between 2012 and 2016, TDR rates to any drug class ranged from 15.7% to 19.2%, and class-specific rates ranged from 10.0% to 12.8% for NNRTIs, 4.1% to 8.1% for nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), and 3.6% to 5.2% for protease inhibitors. The thymidine analogue mutations, M184V/I and the tenofovir-associated DRMs K65R and K70E/Q/G/N/T accounted for 82.9%, 7.3%, and 1.4% of NRTI-associated TDR, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of TDR strains clustered with other TDR strains sharing the same DRMs. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDR has increased significantly in this large cohort, many TDR strains are unlikely to influence the activity of currently preferred first-line ART regimens. The high proportion of DRMs associated with infrequently used regimens combined with the clustering of TDR strains suggest that some TDR strains are being transmitted between ART-naive individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6321854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63218542019-01-15 Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population Rhee, Soo-Yon Clutter, Dana Fessel, W Jeffrey Klein, Daniel Slome, Sally Pinsky, Benjamin A Marcus, Julia L Hurley, Leo Silverberg, Michael J Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L Shafer, Robert W Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: There are few large studies of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence and the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) responsible for TDR in the United States. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease sequences were obtained from 4253 antiretroviral therapy (ART)–naive individuals in a California clinic population from 2003 to 2016. Phylogenetic analyses were performed to study linkages between TDR strains and selection pressure on TDR-associated DRMs. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2016, there was a significant increase in overall (odds ratio [OR], 1.05 per year [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03–1.08]; P < .001) and nonnucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI)–associated TDR (OR, 1.11 per year [95% CI, 1.08–1.15]; P < .001). Between 2012 and 2016, TDR rates to any drug class ranged from 15.7% to 19.2%, and class-specific rates ranged from 10.0% to 12.8% for NNRTIs, 4.1% to 8.1% for nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), and 3.6% to 5.2% for protease inhibitors. The thymidine analogue mutations, M184V/I and the tenofovir-associated DRMs K65R and K70E/Q/G/N/T accounted for 82.9%, 7.3%, and 1.4% of NRTI-associated TDR, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of TDR strains clustered with other TDR strains sharing the same DRMs. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDR has increased significantly in this large cohort, many TDR strains are unlikely to influence the activity of currently preferred first-line ART regimens. The high proportion of DRMs associated with infrequently used regimens combined with the clustering of TDR strains suggest that some TDR strains are being transmitted between ART-naive individuals. Oxford University Press 2019-01-15 2018-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6321854/ /pubmed/29846534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy453 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles and Commentaries
Rhee, Soo-Yon
Clutter, Dana
Fessel, W Jeffrey
Klein, Daniel
Slome, Sally
Pinsky, Benjamin A
Marcus, Julia L
Hurley, Leo
Silverberg, Michael J
Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L
Shafer, Robert W
Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
title Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
title_full Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
title_fullStr Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
title_full_unstemmed Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
title_short Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
title_sort trends in the molecular epidemiology and genetic mechanisms of transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance in a large us clinic population
topic Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy453
work_keys_str_mv AT rheesooyon trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT clutterdana trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT fesselwjeffrey trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT kleindaniel trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT slomesally trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT pinskybenjamina trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT marcusjulial trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT hurleyleo trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT silverbergmichaelj trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT kosakovskypondsergeil trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation
AT shaferrobertw trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation