Cargando…
Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population
BACKGROUND: There are few large studies of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence and the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) responsible for TDR in the United States. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease sequences were obtained from 4253 an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy453 |
_version_ | 1783385525936193536 |
---|---|
author | Rhee, Soo-Yon Clutter, Dana Fessel, W Jeffrey Klein, Daniel Slome, Sally Pinsky, Benjamin A Marcus, Julia L Hurley, Leo Silverberg, Michael J Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L Shafer, Robert W |
author_facet | Rhee, Soo-Yon Clutter, Dana Fessel, W Jeffrey Klein, Daniel Slome, Sally Pinsky, Benjamin A Marcus, Julia L Hurley, Leo Silverberg, Michael J Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L Shafer, Robert W |
author_sort | Rhee, Soo-Yon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are few large studies of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence and the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) responsible for TDR in the United States. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease sequences were obtained from 4253 antiretroviral therapy (ART)–naive individuals in a California clinic population from 2003 to 2016. Phylogenetic analyses were performed to study linkages between TDR strains and selection pressure on TDR-associated DRMs. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2016, there was a significant increase in overall (odds ratio [OR], 1.05 per year [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03–1.08]; P < .001) and nonnucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI)–associated TDR (OR, 1.11 per year [95% CI, 1.08–1.15]; P < .001). Between 2012 and 2016, TDR rates to any drug class ranged from 15.7% to 19.2%, and class-specific rates ranged from 10.0% to 12.8% for NNRTIs, 4.1% to 8.1% for nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), and 3.6% to 5.2% for protease inhibitors. The thymidine analogue mutations, M184V/I and the tenofovir-associated DRMs K65R and K70E/Q/G/N/T accounted for 82.9%, 7.3%, and 1.4% of NRTI-associated TDR, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of TDR strains clustered with other TDR strains sharing the same DRMs. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDR has increased significantly in this large cohort, many TDR strains are unlikely to influence the activity of currently preferred first-line ART regimens. The high proportion of DRMs associated with infrequently used regimens combined with the clustering of TDR strains suggest that some TDR strains are being transmitted between ART-naive individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6321854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63218542019-01-15 Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population Rhee, Soo-Yon Clutter, Dana Fessel, W Jeffrey Klein, Daniel Slome, Sally Pinsky, Benjamin A Marcus, Julia L Hurley, Leo Silverberg, Michael J Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L Shafer, Robert W Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: There are few large studies of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence and the drug resistance mutations (DRMs) responsible for TDR in the United States. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease sequences were obtained from 4253 antiretroviral therapy (ART)–naive individuals in a California clinic population from 2003 to 2016. Phylogenetic analyses were performed to study linkages between TDR strains and selection pressure on TDR-associated DRMs. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2016, there was a significant increase in overall (odds ratio [OR], 1.05 per year [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03–1.08]; P < .001) and nonnucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI)–associated TDR (OR, 1.11 per year [95% CI, 1.08–1.15]; P < .001). Between 2012 and 2016, TDR rates to any drug class ranged from 15.7% to 19.2%, and class-specific rates ranged from 10.0% to 12.8% for NNRTIs, 4.1% to 8.1% for nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs), and 3.6% to 5.2% for protease inhibitors. The thymidine analogue mutations, M184V/I and the tenofovir-associated DRMs K65R and K70E/Q/G/N/T accounted for 82.9%, 7.3%, and 1.4% of NRTI-associated TDR, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of TDR strains clustered with other TDR strains sharing the same DRMs. CONCLUSIONS: Although TDR has increased significantly in this large cohort, many TDR strains are unlikely to influence the activity of currently preferred first-line ART regimens. The high proportion of DRMs associated with infrequently used regimens combined with the clustering of TDR strains suggest that some TDR strains are being transmitted between ART-naive individuals. Oxford University Press 2019-01-15 2018-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6321854/ /pubmed/29846534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy453 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles and Commentaries Rhee, Soo-Yon Clutter, Dana Fessel, W Jeffrey Klein, Daniel Slome, Sally Pinsky, Benjamin A Marcus, Julia L Hurley, Leo Silverberg, Michael J Kosakovsky Pond, Sergei L Shafer, Robert W Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population |
title | Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population |
title_full | Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population |
title_fullStr | Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population |
title_short | Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in a Large US Clinic Population |
title_sort | trends in the molecular epidemiology and genetic mechanisms of transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance in a large us clinic population |
topic | Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6321854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29846534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rheesooyon trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT clutterdana trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT fesselwjeffrey trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT kleindaniel trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT slomesally trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT pinskybenjamina trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT marcusjulial trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT hurleyleo trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT silverbergmichaelj trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT kosakovskypondsergeil trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation AT shaferrobertw trendsinthemolecularepidemiologyandgeneticmechanismsoftransmittedhumanimmunodeficiencyvirustype1drugresistanceinalargeusclinicpopulation |