Cargando…

Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population

BACKGROUND: To stimulate use of generic medicines a combination of supply and demand side mechanisms are employed in the Latvian reimbursement system. It is reported that patients have high out-of-pocket pharmaceutical spending and that they overpay by not choosing generic medicines. Patient prefere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salmane Kulikovska, Ieva, Poplavska, Elita, Ceha, Marija, Mezinska, Signe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0159-5
_version_ 1783385582288764928
author Salmane Kulikovska, Ieva
Poplavska, Elita
Ceha, Marija
Mezinska, Signe
author_facet Salmane Kulikovska, Ieva
Poplavska, Elita
Ceha, Marija
Mezinska, Signe
author_sort Salmane Kulikovska, Ieva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To stimulate use of generic medicines a combination of supply and demand side mechanisms are employed in the Latvian reimbursement system. It is reported that patients have high out-of-pocket pharmaceutical spending and that they overpay by not choosing generic medicines. Patient preferences may be an important obstacle in implementing generic policy. Objective of this study was to assess awareness, opinions and experience of the Latvian population regarding use of generic medicines. METHODS: Survey of representative sample of the population of Latvia (n = 1005) aged 18–74 was conducted in March 2015. The survey was distributed in Latvian and Russian languages using Computer Assisted Web Interviews. Associations between experience with generic medicines, preference for medicines, and sociodemographic variables were tested with Pearson Chi-square statistics. Associations between the previous experience and information given by different sources versus choice between medicines were tested with Spearman’s correlation test. RESULTS: 72.3% of the population were informed about generic medicines. Men (66.9%) and respondents with primary or secondary education (58.3%; 69.3%) were less informed compared to total (72.3%). From those who recalled using generic medicines (n = 441), 94.4% evaluated their experience as positive or neutral. Despite this, only 21% of the population would opt for generic medicines. The strongest preference for brand-name medicines was in the age group > 55 (40.5%). Opinion of a physician was the most important factor when choosing between generic and brand-name medicines (88.7%). The more positive the information provided by general practitioners, physician specialists, pharmacists, family members, friends and internet is perceived, the more likely respondents are to choose generic medicines (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that people in Latvia are aware of generic medicines but only a minority of the population would choose them when presented with a choice. It is therefore important that health care professionals provide objective and unbiased information about generic medicines to their patients. Interventions should aim to reach groups that are less informed and to improve providers’ understanding and communication with patients about generics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6322251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63222512019-01-09 Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population Salmane Kulikovska, Ieva Poplavska, Elita Ceha, Marija Mezinska, Signe J Pharm Policy Pract Research BACKGROUND: To stimulate use of generic medicines a combination of supply and demand side mechanisms are employed in the Latvian reimbursement system. It is reported that patients have high out-of-pocket pharmaceutical spending and that they overpay by not choosing generic medicines. Patient preferences may be an important obstacle in implementing generic policy. Objective of this study was to assess awareness, opinions and experience of the Latvian population regarding use of generic medicines. METHODS: Survey of representative sample of the population of Latvia (n = 1005) aged 18–74 was conducted in March 2015. The survey was distributed in Latvian and Russian languages using Computer Assisted Web Interviews. Associations between experience with generic medicines, preference for medicines, and sociodemographic variables were tested with Pearson Chi-square statistics. Associations between the previous experience and information given by different sources versus choice between medicines were tested with Spearman’s correlation test. RESULTS: 72.3% of the population were informed about generic medicines. Men (66.9%) and respondents with primary or secondary education (58.3%; 69.3%) were less informed compared to total (72.3%). From those who recalled using generic medicines (n = 441), 94.4% evaluated their experience as positive or neutral. Despite this, only 21% of the population would opt for generic medicines. The strongest preference for brand-name medicines was in the age group > 55 (40.5%). Opinion of a physician was the most important factor when choosing between generic and brand-name medicines (88.7%). The more positive the information provided by general practitioners, physician specialists, pharmacists, family members, friends and internet is perceived, the more likely respondents are to choose generic medicines (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that people in Latvia are aware of generic medicines but only a minority of the population would choose them when presented with a choice. It is therefore important that health care professionals provide objective and unbiased information about generic medicines to their patients. Interventions should aim to reach groups that are less informed and to improve providers’ understanding and communication with patients about generics. BioMed Central 2019-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6322251/ /pubmed/30627436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0159-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Salmane Kulikovska, Ieva
Poplavska, Elita
Ceha, Marija
Mezinska, Signe
Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
title Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
title_full Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
title_fullStr Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
title_full_unstemmed Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
title_short Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
title_sort use of generic medicines in latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-018-0159-5
work_keys_str_mv AT salmanekulikovskaieva useofgenericmedicinesinlatviaawarenessopinionsandexperiencesofthepopulation
AT poplavskaelita useofgenericmedicinesinlatviaawarenessopinionsandexperiencesofthepopulation
AT cehamarija useofgenericmedicinesinlatviaawarenessopinionsandexperiencesofthepopulation
AT mezinskasigne useofgenericmedicinesinlatviaawarenessopinionsandexperiencesofthepopulation