Cargando…
The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada
BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are included in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) process to approve new drugs. Often, the measures report on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but can also describe the symptoms, eff...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1070-0 |
_version_ | 1783385599161401344 |
---|---|
author | Soprovich, Allison Ingstrup, Meghan Eurich, Dean T. |
author_facet | Soprovich, Allison Ingstrup, Meghan Eurich, Dean T. |
author_sort | Soprovich, Allison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are included in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) process to approve new drugs. Often, the measures report on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but can also describe the symptoms, efficacy and harms important to patients. They can be generic or population/condition specific, validated or not. We examined the frequency, availability and accessibility of validated, specific PROMs and MCIDs reported in the CDR reports. METHODS: We searched the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) on-line database for completed Common Drug Review, Clinical Review Reports (CDR-CRR) between November 2013 and February 2017. Two independent reviewers examined the reports and references for PROMs and MCIDs. Both reviewers separately categorized the PROMs and MICDs according to purpose, validation, availability and funding received. Discrepancies were rectified by consensus with a third investigator. RESULTS: One-hundred and five unique PROMs were extracted from 39 CDR-CRR, 57% with a HRQoL component. 91/105 (87%) referenced a validation study and 62/105 (59%) referenced a validation study in the study population of interest. Fifty-seven MCID references were extracted from 39 CDR-CRR. 34/57 (60%) were specific to the study population of interest, and 36% had a HRQoL component. 50% of PROM and 53% of MCID references were publicly available. CONCLUSIONS: PROMs and MCIDs referenced in CDR-CRR show similar trends. The majority are validated, but not necessarily in the study population of interest. Continued critical examination is required to evaluate new drugs specific to the population of interest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-1070-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6322322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63223222019-01-10 The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada Soprovich, Allison Ingstrup, Meghan Eurich, Dean T. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) are included in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) process to approve new drugs. Often, the measures report on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but can also describe the symptoms, efficacy and harms important to patients. They can be generic or population/condition specific, validated or not. We examined the frequency, availability and accessibility of validated, specific PROMs and MCIDs reported in the CDR reports. METHODS: We searched the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) on-line database for completed Common Drug Review, Clinical Review Reports (CDR-CRR) between November 2013 and February 2017. Two independent reviewers examined the reports and references for PROMs and MCIDs. Both reviewers separately categorized the PROMs and MICDs according to purpose, validation, availability and funding received. Discrepancies were rectified by consensus with a third investigator. RESULTS: One-hundred and five unique PROMs were extracted from 39 CDR-CRR, 57% with a HRQoL component. 91/105 (87%) referenced a validation study and 62/105 (59%) referenced a validation study in the study population of interest. Fifty-seven MCID references were extracted from 39 CDR-CRR. 34/57 (60%) were specific to the study population of interest, and 36% had a HRQoL component. 50% of PROM and 53% of MCID references were publicly available. CONCLUSIONS: PROMs and MCIDs referenced in CDR-CRR show similar trends. The majority are validated, but not necessarily in the study population of interest. Continued critical examination is required to evaluate new drugs specific to the population of interest. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-1070-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6322322/ /pubmed/30616654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1070-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Soprovich, Allison Ingstrup, Meghan Eurich, Dean T. The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada |
title | The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada |
title_full | The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada |
title_fullStr | The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada |
title_short | The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada |
title_sort | frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in canada |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1070-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soprovichallison thefrequencyandavailabilityofpopulationspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesamongapproveddrugsincanada AT ingstrupmeghan thefrequencyandavailabilityofpopulationspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesamongapproveddrugsincanada AT eurichdeant thefrequencyandavailabilityofpopulationspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesamongapproveddrugsincanada AT soprovichallison frequencyandavailabilityofpopulationspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesamongapproveddrugsincanada AT ingstrupmeghan frequencyandavailabilityofpopulationspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesamongapproveddrugsincanada AT eurichdeant frequencyandavailabilityofpopulationspecificpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesamongapproveddrugsincanada |