Cargando…

Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of lapatinib or trastuzumab alone or both plus chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer patients with positive HER-2 expression. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Wenhua, Zhao, Fugang, Zhou, Changpeng, Zhang, Yongqian, Zhao, Yingchun, Li, Na, Xie, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655674
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S183304
_version_ 1783385637765775360
author Ma, Wenhua
Zhao, Fugang
Zhou, Changpeng
Zhang, Yongqian
Zhao, Yingchun
Li, Na
Xie, Peng
author_facet Ma, Wenhua
Zhao, Fugang
Zhou, Changpeng
Zhang, Yongqian
Zhao, Yingchun
Li, Na
Xie, Peng
author_sort Ma, Wenhua
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of lapatinib or trastuzumab alone or both plus chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer patients with positive HER-2 expression. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China Academic Journals Database were searched from 1994 through December 2017 using the keywords “breast cancer”, “preoperative”, “neo-adjuvant”, “lapatinib”, “pertuzumab”, “Herceptin”, and “trastuzumab”. RESULTS: Meta-analysis found that pathological complete response (PCR; risk ratio [RR]=0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.93) and tall PCR (tPCR; RR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.88) of chemotherapy plus lapatinib were significantly less effective or safe compared to that of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (P<0.05). PCR (RR=1.30, 95% CI: 1.15–1.47) and tPCR (RR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.16–1.50) of chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab were significantly superior to that of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab alone (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in breast reservation rate between chemotherapy plus lapatinib vs chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (RR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.72–1.16) or chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab (RR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.73–1.68, P>0.05). Incidence of diarrhea, hepatic toxicity, and skin rash in the groups of chemotherapy plus lapatinib or chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Efficacy of lapatinib was less than that of trastuzumab, but incidence of adverse effect of lapatinib was higher than that of trastuzumab. Combination of chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab could significantly increase PCR and tPCR in breast cancer patients, but rate of breast conservation, event-free survival, and overall survival was not significantly improved. Incidence of diarrhea, hepatic toxicity, and skin rash was significantly increased in the groups using lapatinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6322707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63227072019-01-17 Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ma, Wenhua Zhao, Fugang Zhou, Changpeng Zhang, Yongqian Zhao, Yingchun Li, Na Xie, Peng Onco Targets Ther Original Research AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of lapatinib or trastuzumab alone or both plus chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer patients with positive HER-2 expression. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China Academic Journals Database were searched from 1994 through December 2017 using the keywords “breast cancer”, “preoperative”, “neo-adjuvant”, “lapatinib”, “pertuzumab”, “Herceptin”, and “trastuzumab”. RESULTS: Meta-analysis found that pathological complete response (PCR; risk ratio [RR]=0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.93) and tall PCR (tPCR; RR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.88) of chemotherapy plus lapatinib were significantly less effective or safe compared to that of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (P<0.05). PCR (RR=1.30, 95% CI: 1.15–1.47) and tPCR (RR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.16–1.50) of chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab were significantly superior to that of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab alone (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in breast reservation rate between chemotherapy plus lapatinib vs chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (RR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.72–1.16) or chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab (RR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.73–1.68, P>0.05). Incidence of diarrhea, hepatic toxicity, and skin rash in the groups of chemotherapy plus lapatinib or chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Efficacy of lapatinib was less than that of trastuzumab, but incidence of adverse effect of lapatinib was higher than that of trastuzumab. Combination of chemotherapy plus both lapatinib and trastuzumab could significantly increase PCR and tPCR in breast cancer patients, but rate of breast conservation, event-free survival, and overall survival was not significantly improved. Incidence of diarrhea, hepatic toxicity, and skin rash was significantly increased in the groups using lapatinib. Dove Medical Press 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6322707/ /pubmed/30655674 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S183304 Text en © 2019 Ma et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ma, Wenhua
Zhao, Fugang
Zhou, Changpeng
Zhang, Yongqian
Zhao, Yingchun
Li, Na
Xie, Peng
Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the HER-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort targeted neoadjuvant therapy in the her-2-positive breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655674
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S183304
work_keys_str_mv AT mawenhua targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaofugang targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouchangpeng targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyongqian targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoyingchun targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lina targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiepeng targetedneoadjuvanttherapyintheher2positivebreastcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis