Cargando…
Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual’s AL using the corneal radius and refractive er...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210387 |
_version_ | 1783385644507070464 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyeong-Su Yu, Dong-Sik Cho, Hyun Gug Moon, Byeong-Yeon Kim, Sang-Yeob |
author_facet | Kim, Hyeong-Su Yu, Dong-Sik Cho, Hyun Gug Moon, Byeong-Yeon Kim, Sang-Yeob |
author_sort | Kim, Hyeong-Su |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual’s AL using the corneal radius and refractive error, and to demonstrate the applicability of this formula. A total of 348 subjects underwent keratometry, objective and subjective refraction, and AL measurement. The formula of calculated AL for prediction obtained from the original Gullstrand simplified schematic eye: calculated AL = (24.00 × aveK/7.80)—(SE × 0.40), where aveK and SE denote average corneal radius and spherical equivalent, respectively. Calculated AL was 24.50 ± 1.83 mm, which was 0.18 ± 0.47 mm longer than the measured value of 24.32 ± 1.73 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion showing the differences between the calculated and measured ALs were 284 eyes (40.8%) for 0.00–0.25 mm, 525 eyes (75.4%) for less than 0.50 mm, 665 eyes (95.5%) for less than 1.00 mm, and 31 eyes (4.5%) for more than 1.01 mm. Correlation coefficient showed a very high correlation between calculated and measured ALs (r = 0.967, p < 0.001), and higher in the myopic than in the hyperopic group. The mean difference was 0.18 mm; the 95% limit of agreement was +1.10—-0.75 mm in all groups. Agreement was better in hyperopic eyes than myopic eyes. Prediction from calculation of AL with a formula using the corneal radius and SE provides an alternative method to direct measurements of AL, especially in the restricted environment, which can’t use biometric equipment for personalized ophthalmic lens design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6322735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63227352019-01-19 Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design Kim, Hyeong-Su Yu, Dong-Sik Cho, Hyun Gug Moon, Byeong-Yeon Kim, Sang-Yeob PLoS One Research Article Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual’s AL using the corneal radius and refractive error, and to demonstrate the applicability of this formula. A total of 348 subjects underwent keratometry, objective and subjective refraction, and AL measurement. The formula of calculated AL for prediction obtained from the original Gullstrand simplified schematic eye: calculated AL = (24.00 × aveK/7.80)—(SE × 0.40), where aveK and SE denote average corneal radius and spherical equivalent, respectively. Calculated AL was 24.50 ± 1.83 mm, which was 0.18 ± 0.47 mm longer than the measured value of 24.32 ± 1.73 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion showing the differences between the calculated and measured ALs were 284 eyes (40.8%) for 0.00–0.25 mm, 525 eyes (75.4%) for less than 0.50 mm, 665 eyes (95.5%) for less than 1.00 mm, and 31 eyes (4.5%) for more than 1.01 mm. Correlation coefficient showed a very high correlation between calculated and measured ALs (r = 0.967, p < 0.001), and higher in the myopic than in the hyperopic group. The mean difference was 0.18 mm; the 95% limit of agreement was +1.10—-0.75 mm in all groups. Agreement was better in hyperopic eyes than myopic eyes. Prediction from calculation of AL with a formula using the corneal radius and SE provides an alternative method to direct measurements of AL, especially in the restricted environment, which can’t use biometric equipment for personalized ophthalmic lens design. Public Library of Science 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6322735/ /pubmed/30615674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210387 Text en © 2019 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Hyeong-Su Yu, Dong-Sik Cho, Hyun Gug Moon, Byeong-Yeon Kim, Sang-Yeob Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
title | Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
title_full | Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
title_fullStr | Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
title_short | Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
title_sort | comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyeongsu comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign AT yudongsik comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign AT chohyungug comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign AT moonbyeongyeon comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign AT kimsangyeob comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign |