Cargando…

Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design

Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual’s AL using the corneal radius and refractive er...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyeong-Su, Yu, Dong-Sik, Cho, Hyun Gug, Moon, Byeong-Yeon, Kim, Sang-Yeob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210387
_version_ 1783385644507070464
author Kim, Hyeong-Su
Yu, Dong-Sik
Cho, Hyun Gug
Moon, Byeong-Yeon
Kim, Sang-Yeob
author_facet Kim, Hyeong-Su
Yu, Dong-Sik
Cho, Hyun Gug
Moon, Byeong-Yeon
Kim, Sang-Yeob
author_sort Kim, Hyeong-Su
collection PubMed
description Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual’s AL using the corneal radius and refractive error, and to demonstrate the applicability of this formula. A total of 348 subjects underwent keratometry, objective and subjective refraction, and AL measurement. The formula of calculated AL for prediction obtained from the original Gullstrand simplified schematic eye: calculated AL = (24.00 × aveK/7.80)—(SE × 0.40), where aveK and SE denote average corneal radius and spherical equivalent, respectively. Calculated AL was 24.50 ± 1.83 mm, which was 0.18 ± 0.47 mm longer than the measured value of 24.32 ± 1.73 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion showing the differences between the calculated and measured ALs were 284 eyes (40.8%) for 0.00–0.25 mm, 525 eyes (75.4%) for less than 0.50 mm, 665 eyes (95.5%) for less than 1.00 mm, and 31 eyes (4.5%) for more than 1.01 mm. Correlation coefficient showed a very high correlation between calculated and measured ALs (r = 0.967, p < 0.001), and higher in the myopic than in the hyperopic group. The mean difference was 0.18 mm; the 95% limit of agreement was +1.10—-0.75 mm in all groups. Agreement was better in hyperopic eyes than myopic eyes. Prediction from calculation of AL with a formula using the corneal radius and SE provides an alternative method to direct measurements of AL, especially in the restricted environment, which can’t use biometric equipment for personalized ophthalmic lens design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6322735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63227352019-01-19 Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design Kim, Hyeong-Su Yu, Dong-Sik Cho, Hyun Gug Moon, Byeong-Yeon Kim, Sang-Yeob PLoS One Research Article Ocular parameters have been applied to ophthalmic lens designs in order to satisfy individual wearers. An axial length (AL) of them can be used in individual ophthalmic lens designs. Our aim was to propose a reliable formula that predicts an individual’s AL using the corneal radius and refractive error, and to demonstrate the applicability of this formula. A total of 348 subjects underwent keratometry, objective and subjective refraction, and AL measurement. The formula of calculated AL for prediction obtained from the original Gullstrand simplified schematic eye: calculated AL = (24.00 × aveK/7.80)—(SE × 0.40), where aveK and SE denote average corneal radius and spherical equivalent, respectively. Calculated AL was 24.50 ± 1.83 mm, which was 0.18 ± 0.47 mm longer than the measured value of 24.32 ± 1.73 mm (p < 0.001). The proportion showing the differences between the calculated and measured ALs were 284 eyes (40.8%) for 0.00–0.25 mm, 525 eyes (75.4%) for less than 0.50 mm, 665 eyes (95.5%) for less than 1.00 mm, and 31 eyes (4.5%) for more than 1.01 mm. Correlation coefficient showed a very high correlation between calculated and measured ALs (r = 0.967, p < 0.001), and higher in the myopic than in the hyperopic group. The mean difference was 0.18 mm; the 95% limit of agreement was +1.10—-0.75 mm in all groups. Agreement was better in hyperopic eyes than myopic eyes. Prediction from calculation of AL with a formula using the corneal radius and SE provides an alternative method to direct measurements of AL, especially in the restricted environment, which can’t use biometric equipment for personalized ophthalmic lens design. Public Library of Science 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6322735/ /pubmed/30615674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210387 Text en © 2019 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Hyeong-Su
Yu, Dong-Sik
Cho, Hyun Gug
Moon, Byeong-Yeon
Kim, Sang-Yeob
Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
title Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
title_full Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
title_fullStr Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
title_short Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
title_sort comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210387
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeongsu comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign
AT yudongsik comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign
AT chohyungug comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign
AT moonbyeongyeon comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign
AT kimsangyeob comparisonofpredictedandmeasuredaxiallengthforophthalmiclensdesign