Cargando…

Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills

BACKGROUND: Learning self-efficacy, defined as learners’ confidence in their capability to learn specific subjects, is crucial for the enhancement of academic progress, because it is positively correlated with academic achievements and effective learning strategy use. In this study, we developed a u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Yi-No, Chang, Chun-Hao, Kao, Chih-Chin, Chen, Chien-Yu, Wu, Chien-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209155
_version_ 1783385647774433280
author Kang, Yi-No
Chang, Chun-Hao
Kao, Chih-Chin
Chen, Chien-Yu
Wu, Chien-Chih
author_facet Kang, Yi-No
Chang, Chun-Hao
Kao, Chih-Chin
Chen, Chien-Yu
Wu, Chien-Chih
author_sort Kang, Yi-No
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning self-efficacy, defined as learners’ confidence in their capability to learn specific subjects, is crucial for the enhancement of academic progress, because it is positively correlated with academic achievements and effective learning strategy use. In this study, we developed a universal scale called the Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (L-SES) for Clinical Skills for undergraduate medical students and validated it through item analysis and content validity index (CVI) calculation. DESIGN: The L-SES was developed based on the framework of Bloom’s taxonomy, and the questions were generated through expert consensus and CVI calculation. A pilot version of the L-SES was administered to 235 medical students attending a basic clinical skills course. The collected data were then examined through item analysis. RESULTS: The first draft of the L-SES comprised 15 questions. After expert consensus and CVI calculation, 3 questions were eliminated; hence, the pilot version comprised 12 questions. The CVI values of the 12 questions were between .88 and 1, indicating high content validity. Moreover, the item analysis indicated that the quality of L-SES reached the qualified threshold. The results showed that the L-SES scores were unaffected by gender (t = −0.049; 95% confidence interval [−.115, .109], p > .05). CONCLUSION: The L-SES is a short, well-developed scale that can serve as a generic assessment tool for measuring medical students’ learning self-efficacy for clinical skills. Moreover, the L-SES is unaffected by gender differences. However, additional analyses in relevant educational settings are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6322749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63227492019-01-19 Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills Kang, Yi-No Chang, Chun-Hao Kao, Chih-Chin Chen, Chien-Yu Wu, Chien-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Learning self-efficacy, defined as learners’ confidence in their capability to learn specific subjects, is crucial for the enhancement of academic progress, because it is positively correlated with academic achievements and effective learning strategy use. In this study, we developed a universal scale called the Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (L-SES) for Clinical Skills for undergraduate medical students and validated it through item analysis and content validity index (CVI) calculation. DESIGN: The L-SES was developed based on the framework of Bloom’s taxonomy, and the questions were generated through expert consensus and CVI calculation. A pilot version of the L-SES was administered to 235 medical students attending a basic clinical skills course. The collected data were then examined through item analysis. RESULTS: The first draft of the L-SES comprised 15 questions. After expert consensus and CVI calculation, 3 questions were eliminated; hence, the pilot version comprised 12 questions. The CVI values of the 12 questions were between .88 and 1, indicating high content validity. Moreover, the item analysis indicated that the quality of L-SES reached the qualified threshold. The results showed that the L-SES scores were unaffected by gender (t = −0.049; 95% confidence interval [−.115, .109], p > .05). CONCLUSION: The L-SES is a short, well-developed scale that can serve as a generic assessment tool for measuring medical students’ learning self-efficacy for clinical skills. Moreover, the L-SES is unaffected by gender differences. However, additional analyses in relevant educational settings are needed. Public Library of Science 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6322749/ /pubmed/30615610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209155 Text en © 2019 Kang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kang, Yi-No
Chang, Chun-Hao
Kao, Chih-Chin
Chen, Chien-Yu
Wu, Chien-Chih
Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
title Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
title_full Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
title_fullStr Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
title_full_unstemmed Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
title_short Development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
title_sort development of a short and universal learning self-efficacy scale for clinical skills
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209155
work_keys_str_mv AT kangyino developmentofashortanduniversallearningselfefficacyscaleforclinicalskills
AT changchunhao developmentofashortanduniversallearningselfefficacyscaleforclinicalskills
AT kaochihchin developmentofashortanduniversallearningselfefficacyscaleforclinicalskills
AT chenchienyu developmentofashortanduniversallearningselfefficacyscaleforclinicalskills
AT wuchienchih developmentofashortanduniversallearningselfefficacyscaleforclinicalskills