Cargando…

Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study

BACKGROUND: India contributes ~60% to the global leprosy burden. The country implements 14-day community-based leprosy case detection campaigns (LCDC) periodically in all high endemic states. Paramedical staff screen the population and medical officers of primary health centres (PHCs) diagnose and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagh, Ashish Nareshkumar, Mugudalabetta, Shivakumar, Gutierrez, Nimer Ortuno, Padebettu, Krishnamurthy, Pandey, Ajay Kumar, Pandey, Bijoy Kumar, Thulasingam, Mahalakshmy, Satyanarayana, Srinath, Dongre, Amol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007004
_version_ 1783385656893898752
author Wagh, Ashish Nareshkumar
Mugudalabetta, Shivakumar
Gutierrez, Nimer Ortuno
Padebettu, Krishnamurthy
Pandey, Ajay Kumar
Pandey, Bijoy Kumar
Thulasingam, Mahalakshmy
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dongre, Amol
author_facet Wagh, Ashish Nareshkumar
Mugudalabetta, Shivakumar
Gutierrez, Nimer Ortuno
Padebettu, Krishnamurthy
Pandey, Ajay Kumar
Pandey, Bijoy Kumar
Thulasingam, Mahalakshmy
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dongre, Amol
author_sort Wagh, Ashish Nareshkumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: India contributes ~60% to the global leprosy burden. The country implements 14-day community-based leprosy case detection campaigns (LCDC) periodically in all high endemic states. Paramedical staff screen the population and medical officers of primary health centres (PHCs) diagnose and treat leprosy cases. Several new cases were detected during the two LCDCs held in September-2016 and February-2018. Following these LCDCs, a validation exercise was conducted in 8 Primary health centres (PHCs) of 4 districts in Bihar State by an independent expert group, to assess the correctness of case diagnosis. Just before the February 2018 LCDC campaign, we conducted an “appreciative inquiry” (AI) involving the health care staff of these 8 PHCs using the 4-D framework (Discovery-Dream-Design-Destiny). OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the incorrect case diagnosis (false positive diagnosis) reduced as a result of AI in the 8 PHCs between the two LCDC conducted in September-2016 and February-2018. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A three-phase quantitative-qualitative-quantitative mixed methods research (embedded design) with the two validation exercises conducted following September-2016 and February-2018 LCDCs as quantitative phases and AI as qualitative phase. In September-2016 LCDC, 303 new leprosy cases were detected, of which 196 cases were validated and 58 (29.6%) were false positive diagnosis. In February-2018 LCDC, 118 new leprosy cases were detected of which 96 cases were validated and 22 cases (23.4%) were false positive diagnosis. After adjusting for the age, gender, type of cases and individual PHCs fixed effects, the proportion of false positive diagnosis reduced by -9% [95% confidence intervals (95%CI): -20.2% to 1.7%, p = 0.068] CONCLUSION: False positive diagnosis is a major issue during LCDCs. Though the decline in false positive diagnosis is not statistically significant, the findings are encouraging and indicates that appreciative inquiry can be used to address this deficiency in programme implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6322788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63227882019-01-19 Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study Wagh, Ashish Nareshkumar Mugudalabetta, Shivakumar Gutierrez, Nimer Ortuno Padebettu, Krishnamurthy Pandey, Ajay Kumar Pandey, Bijoy Kumar Thulasingam, Mahalakshmy Satyanarayana, Srinath Dongre, Amol PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: India contributes ~60% to the global leprosy burden. The country implements 14-day community-based leprosy case detection campaigns (LCDC) periodically in all high endemic states. Paramedical staff screen the population and medical officers of primary health centres (PHCs) diagnose and treat leprosy cases. Several new cases were detected during the two LCDCs held in September-2016 and February-2018. Following these LCDCs, a validation exercise was conducted in 8 Primary health centres (PHCs) of 4 districts in Bihar State by an independent expert group, to assess the correctness of case diagnosis. Just before the February 2018 LCDC campaign, we conducted an “appreciative inquiry” (AI) involving the health care staff of these 8 PHCs using the 4-D framework (Discovery-Dream-Design-Destiny). OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the incorrect case diagnosis (false positive diagnosis) reduced as a result of AI in the 8 PHCs between the two LCDC conducted in September-2016 and February-2018. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A three-phase quantitative-qualitative-quantitative mixed methods research (embedded design) with the two validation exercises conducted following September-2016 and February-2018 LCDCs as quantitative phases and AI as qualitative phase. In September-2016 LCDC, 303 new leprosy cases were detected, of which 196 cases were validated and 58 (29.6%) were false positive diagnosis. In February-2018 LCDC, 118 new leprosy cases were detected of which 96 cases were validated and 22 cases (23.4%) were false positive diagnosis. After adjusting for the age, gender, type of cases and individual PHCs fixed effects, the proportion of false positive diagnosis reduced by -9% [95% confidence intervals (95%CI): -20.2% to 1.7%, p = 0.068] CONCLUSION: False positive diagnosis is a major issue during LCDCs. Though the decline in false positive diagnosis is not statistically significant, the findings are encouraging and indicates that appreciative inquiry can be used to address this deficiency in programme implementation. Public Library of Science 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6322788/ /pubmed/30576309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007004 Text en © 2018 Wagh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wagh, Ashish Nareshkumar
Mugudalabetta, Shivakumar
Gutierrez, Nimer Ortuno
Padebettu, Krishnamurthy
Pandey, Ajay Kumar
Pandey, Bijoy Kumar
Thulasingam, Mahalakshmy
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Dongre, Amol
Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study
title Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study
title_full Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study
title_fullStr Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study
title_full_unstemmed Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study
title_short Does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in Bihar, India? An operational research study
title_sort does appreciative inquiry decrease false positive diagnosis during leprosy case detection campaigns in bihar, india? an operational research study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007004
work_keys_str_mv AT waghashishnareshkumar doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT mugudalabettashivakumar doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT gutierreznimerortuno doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT padebettukrishnamurthy doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT pandeyajaykumar doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT pandeybijoykumar doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT thulasingammahalakshmy doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT satyanarayanasrinath doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy
AT dongreamol doesappreciativeinquirydecreasefalsepositivediagnosisduringleprosycasedetectioncampaignsinbiharindiaanoperationalresearchstudy