Cargando…

Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)

BACKGROUND: Laboratory Animal Allergy (LAA) has been considered a risk for the workers since 1989 by the NIOSH. About one third of the Laboratory Animal Workers (LAWs) can manifest symptoms to LAA as asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis and cutaneous reactions. The prevalence of LAA-induced clinical sym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D'Ovidio, Maria C, Wirz, Annarita, Zennaro, Danila, Massari, Stefania, Melis, Paola, Peri, Vittoria M, Rafaiani, Chiara, Riviello, Maria C, Mari, Adriano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIMS Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2018.4.352
_version_ 1783385675057332224
author D'Ovidio, Maria C
Wirz, Annarita
Zennaro, Danila
Massari, Stefania
Melis, Paola
Peri, Vittoria M
Rafaiani, Chiara
Riviello, Maria C
Mari, Adriano
author_facet D'Ovidio, Maria C
Wirz, Annarita
Zennaro, Danila
Massari, Stefania
Melis, Paola
Peri, Vittoria M
Rafaiani, Chiara
Riviello, Maria C
Mari, Adriano
author_sort D'Ovidio, Maria C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laboratory Animal Allergy (LAA) has been considered a risk for the workers since 1989 by the NIOSH. About one third of the Laboratory Animal Workers (LAWs) can manifest symptoms to LAA as asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis and cutaneous reactions. The prevalence of LAA-induced clinical symptoms has been estimated with a great variability (4–44%) also due to the different methodologies applied. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prevalence of IgE positivity to mouse and rat allergens in LAWs and assess which factors are predisposing to sensitization among subjects exposed to laboratory animals in the workplace. METHODS: One hundred LAWs were invited to fill out a questionnaire regarding current allergic symptoms, atopic history, home environment, previous and current occupational history. IgE reactivity versus specific allergens was evaluated with ImmunoCAP ISAC. RESULTS: Out of one hundred LAWs, 18% had a serum susceptibility to mouse and/or rat allergens and 42% reported to have occupational allergy symptoms. Combining the results acquired by ImmunoCAP ISAC and questionnaire, 17% of LAWs have been defined as LAWs-LAA positive since they present a positive IgE response and allergy symptoms, 1% LAWs-LAA sensitized, 25% LAWs-LAA symptomatic and 57% LAWs-LAA negative. Presence of previous allergy symptoms in work and life environment were significantly related to LAWs-LAA positive/sensitized. CONCLUSIONS: The study aimed to define the immunological profile of LAWs using the proteomic array as an innovative approach in the study of environmental and occupational exposure to allergens. We suggested a definition of LAWs-LAA considering serum IgE response and presence of allergy symptoms. The proposed approach has the advantage to provide a standard methodology for evaluating the specific IgE responsiveness to animal allergens in specific workplace also considering the immunological profile of workers referred to exposure in life and occupational environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6322995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AIMS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63229952019-01-10 Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA) D'Ovidio, Maria C Wirz, Annarita Zennaro, Danila Massari, Stefania Melis, Paola Peri, Vittoria M Rafaiani, Chiara Riviello, Maria C Mari, Adriano AIMS Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Laboratory Animal Allergy (LAA) has been considered a risk for the workers since 1989 by the NIOSH. About one third of the Laboratory Animal Workers (LAWs) can manifest symptoms to LAA as asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis and cutaneous reactions. The prevalence of LAA-induced clinical symptoms has been estimated with a great variability (4–44%) also due to the different methodologies applied. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prevalence of IgE positivity to mouse and rat allergens in LAWs and assess which factors are predisposing to sensitization among subjects exposed to laboratory animals in the workplace. METHODS: One hundred LAWs were invited to fill out a questionnaire regarding current allergic symptoms, atopic history, home environment, previous and current occupational history. IgE reactivity versus specific allergens was evaluated with ImmunoCAP ISAC. RESULTS: Out of one hundred LAWs, 18% had a serum susceptibility to mouse and/or rat allergens and 42% reported to have occupational allergy symptoms. Combining the results acquired by ImmunoCAP ISAC and questionnaire, 17% of LAWs have been defined as LAWs-LAA positive since they present a positive IgE response and allergy symptoms, 1% LAWs-LAA sensitized, 25% LAWs-LAA symptomatic and 57% LAWs-LAA negative. Presence of previous allergy symptoms in work and life environment were significantly related to LAWs-LAA positive/sensitized. CONCLUSIONS: The study aimed to define the immunological profile of LAWs using the proteomic array as an innovative approach in the study of environmental and occupational exposure to allergens. We suggested a definition of LAWs-LAA considering serum IgE response and presence of allergy symptoms. The proposed approach has the advantage to provide a standard methodology for evaluating the specific IgE responsiveness to animal allergens in specific workplace also considering the immunological profile of workers referred to exposure in life and occupational environment. AIMS Press 2018-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6322995/ /pubmed/30631779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2018.4.352 Text en © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
spellingShingle Research Article
D'Ovidio, Maria C
Wirz, Annarita
Zennaro, Danila
Massari, Stefania
Melis, Paola
Peri, Vittoria M
Rafaiani, Chiara
Riviello, Maria C
Mari, Adriano
Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)
title Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)
title_full Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)
title_fullStr Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)
title_full_unstemmed Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)
title_short Biological occupational allergy: Protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (LAA)
title_sort biological occupational allergy: protein microarray for the study of laboratory animal allergy (laa)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6322995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2018.4.352
work_keys_str_mv AT dovidiomariac biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT wirzannarita biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT zennarodanila biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT massaristefania biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT melispaola biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT perivittoriam biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT rafaianichiara biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT riviellomariac biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa
AT mariadriano biologicaloccupationalallergyproteinmicroarrayforthestudyoflaboratoryanimalallergylaa