Cargando…

Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although the functional movement screen (FMS) has been widely applied for screening athletes, no previous study has used FMS scores to examine the association between distinct training seasons in high school baseball players. The aims of this study were to ascertain the functio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chia-Lun, Hsu, Mei-Chich, Chang, Wen-Dien, Wang, Szu-Chieh, Chen, Chao-Yen, Chou, Pei-Hsi, Chang, Nai-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2018.06.004
_version_ 1783385705135734784
author Lee, Chia-Lun
Hsu, Mei-Chich
Chang, Wen-Dien
Wang, Szu-Chieh
Chen, Chao-Yen
Chou, Pei-Hsi
Chang, Nai-Jen
author_facet Lee, Chia-Lun
Hsu, Mei-Chich
Chang, Wen-Dien
Wang, Szu-Chieh
Chen, Chao-Yen
Chou, Pei-Hsi
Chang, Nai-Jen
author_sort Lee, Chia-Lun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although the functional movement screen (FMS) has been widely applied for screening athletes, no previous study has used FMS scores to examine the association between distinct training seasons in high school baseball players. The aims of this study were to ascertain the functional movement screen (FMS) scores differences between the preparative period (PPP) and the competitive period (CPP) among high school baseball players and further determine whether FMS can be used as a tool to predict injuries during two major periods. METHODS: Fifty-five male high school baseball players (age 15.3 ± 1.7 years; height 1.7 ± 0.8 m; weight 64.6 ± 11.5 kg) volunteered. Athletic injuries were reported through a self-report questionnaire. Players performed the FMS during the PPP and the CPP. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate a cutoff total composite score ≤ 14 for the relationship between the FMS score and injury. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and an area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: FMS individual task score and total composite score were significantly lower in the CPP than in the PPP. However, a cutoff total composite score ≤14 for risk of injury, determined through a ROC curve, represented a low sensitivity of 58%, NPV of 66%, an AUC of 69%, specificity of 79%, and PPV of 71%. CONCLUSION: Although the low sensitivity and NPV and AUC scores indicated that the FMS does not accurately predict the risk of injury, the FMS individual task and total composite scores differed significantly between the PPP and CPP. Therefore, FMS could be used as a tool to identify physical deficiencies between distinct training seasons; however, utilizing the FMS as a screening tool for injury prediction in particular during the CPP in this population would not be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6323160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63231602019-01-18 Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players Lee, Chia-Lun Hsu, Mei-Chich Chang, Wen-Dien Wang, Szu-Chieh Chen, Chao-Yen Chou, Pei-Hsi Chang, Nai-Jen J Exerc Sci Fit Original Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although the functional movement screen (FMS) has been widely applied for screening athletes, no previous study has used FMS scores to examine the association between distinct training seasons in high school baseball players. The aims of this study were to ascertain the functional movement screen (FMS) scores differences between the preparative period (PPP) and the competitive period (CPP) among high school baseball players and further determine whether FMS can be used as a tool to predict injuries during two major periods. METHODS: Fifty-five male high school baseball players (age 15.3 ± 1.7 years; height 1.7 ± 0.8 m; weight 64.6 ± 11.5 kg) volunteered. Athletic injuries were reported through a self-report questionnaire. Players performed the FMS during the PPP and the CPP. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate a cutoff total composite score ≤ 14 for the relationship between the FMS score and injury. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and an area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: FMS individual task score and total composite score were significantly lower in the CPP than in the PPP. However, a cutoff total composite score ≤14 for risk of injury, determined through a ROC curve, represented a low sensitivity of 58%, NPV of 66%, an AUC of 69%, specificity of 79%, and PPV of 71%. CONCLUSION: Although the low sensitivity and NPV and AUC scores indicated that the FMS does not accurately predict the risk of injury, the FMS individual task and total composite scores differed significantly between the PPP and CPP. Therefore, FMS could be used as a tool to identify physical deficiencies between distinct training seasons; however, utilizing the FMS as a screening tool for injury prediction in particular during the CPP in this population would not be recommended. The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2018-08 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6323160/ /pubmed/30662496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2018.06.004 Text en © 2018 The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Chia-Lun
Hsu, Mei-Chich
Chang, Wen-Dien
Wang, Szu-Chieh
Chen, Chao-Yen
Chou, Pei-Hsi
Chang, Nai-Jen
Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
title Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
title_full Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
title_fullStr Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
title_full_unstemmed Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
title_short Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
title_sort functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2018.06.004
work_keys_str_mv AT leechialun functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers
AT hsumeichich functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers
AT changwendien functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers
AT wangszuchieh functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers
AT chenchaoyen functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers
AT choupeihsi functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers
AT changnaijen functionalmovementscreencomparisonbetweenthepreparativeperiodandcompetitiveperiodinhighschoolbaseballplayers