Cargando…
Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study
BACKGROUND: For those who have experienced suicidal behaviour, discharge from the hospital emergency department and other acute settings represents a period of heightened vulnerability for future suicide risk. Current guidelines for suicide response in acute settings often fail to fully address the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1995-1 |
_version_ | 1783385811131039744 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Nicole T. M. Shand, Fiona Torok, Michelle Halliday, Lyndal Reavley, Nicola J. |
author_facet | Hill, Nicole T. M. Shand, Fiona Torok, Michelle Halliday, Lyndal Reavley, Nicola J. |
author_sort | Hill, Nicole T. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For those who have experienced suicidal behaviour, discharge from the hospital emergency department and other acute settings represents a period of heightened vulnerability for future suicide risk. Current guidelines for suicide response in acute settings often fail to fully address the barriers faced by emergency department personnel who have contact with a person who presents for suicidal behaviour, and have been developed largely without the input of consumers or service users. The aim of the study was to use the Delphi expert consensus method to develop guidelines for staff responding to suicidal presentations in acute settings. METHODS: Systematic searches of academic and grey literature and interviews with key informants were conducted in order to develop a 525-item questionnaire, which comprised actions staff can take when responding to suicide-related presentations in acute settings. This was administered over three rounds to two panels consisting of Australian experts (39 health professionals, 50 consumers with lived experience). Items that reached consensus by at least 80% across both panels were included in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 420 items were rated as essential or important by at least 80% of both panels. The items included strategies that covered initial contact, assessment, referral, discharge and follow-up, staff training, and linkage with community aftercare services. Participation rate across all three rounds was 67.4% (78% consumers, 53.8% professionals). CONCLUSION: The guidelines include strategies for responding to suicidal behaviour in acute settings. These guidelines can be used to inform policy development and address barriers to best practice for those working in the area. Future research should investigate ways to optimise implementation of these guidelines in order to improve equal access to quality care for who present to acute settings for suicidal behaviour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-1995-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6323675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63236752019-01-10 Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study Hill, Nicole T. M. Shand, Fiona Torok, Michelle Halliday, Lyndal Reavley, Nicola J. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: For those who have experienced suicidal behaviour, discharge from the hospital emergency department and other acute settings represents a period of heightened vulnerability for future suicide risk. Current guidelines for suicide response in acute settings often fail to fully address the barriers faced by emergency department personnel who have contact with a person who presents for suicidal behaviour, and have been developed largely without the input of consumers or service users. The aim of the study was to use the Delphi expert consensus method to develop guidelines for staff responding to suicidal presentations in acute settings. METHODS: Systematic searches of academic and grey literature and interviews with key informants were conducted in order to develop a 525-item questionnaire, which comprised actions staff can take when responding to suicide-related presentations in acute settings. This was administered over three rounds to two panels consisting of Australian experts (39 health professionals, 50 consumers with lived experience). Items that reached consensus by at least 80% across both panels were included in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 420 items were rated as essential or important by at least 80% of both panels. The items included strategies that covered initial contact, assessment, referral, discharge and follow-up, staff training, and linkage with community aftercare services. Participation rate across all three rounds was 67.4% (78% consumers, 53.8% professionals). CONCLUSION: The guidelines include strategies for responding to suicidal behaviour in acute settings. These guidelines can be used to inform policy development and address barriers to best practice for those working in the area. Future research should investigate ways to optimise implementation of these guidelines in order to improve equal access to quality care for who present to acute settings for suicidal behaviour. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12888-018-1995-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6323675/ /pubmed/30616582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1995-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hill, Nicole T. M. Shand, Fiona Torok, Michelle Halliday, Lyndal Reavley, Nicola J. Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study |
title | Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study |
title_full | Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study |
title_fullStr | Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study |
title_short | Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study |
title_sort | development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a delphi expert consensus study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1995-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillnicoletm developmentofbestpracticeguidelinesforsuiciderelatedcrisisresponseandaftercareintheemergencydepartmentorotheracutesettingsadelphiexpertconsensusstudy AT shandfiona developmentofbestpracticeguidelinesforsuiciderelatedcrisisresponseandaftercareintheemergencydepartmentorotheracutesettingsadelphiexpertconsensusstudy AT torokmichelle developmentofbestpracticeguidelinesforsuiciderelatedcrisisresponseandaftercareintheemergencydepartmentorotheracutesettingsadelphiexpertconsensusstudy AT hallidaylyndal developmentofbestpracticeguidelinesforsuiciderelatedcrisisresponseandaftercareintheemergencydepartmentorotheracutesettingsadelphiexpertconsensusstudy AT reavleynicolaj developmentofbestpracticeguidelinesforsuiciderelatedcrisisresponseandaftercareintheemergencydepartmentorotheracutesettingsadelphiexpertconsensusstudy |