Cargando…

Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Yet, we observed that some reviews judge randomised trials as high or unclear risk of bias (ROB) for sequence generation, potentially introducing bias. However, to date, the extent of this issue has not been w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wuytack, Francesca, Regan, Maria, Biesty, Linda, Meskell, Pauline, Lutomski, Jennifer E., O’Donnell, Martin, Treweek, Shaun, Devane, Declan
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0924-1

Ejemplares similares

A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Biesty, Linda, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The effectiveness of physiologically based early warning or track and trigger systems after triage in adult patients presenting to emergency departments: a systematic review
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Feasibility study protocol of a pragmatic, randomised controlled pilot trial: membrane sweeping to prevent post-term pregnancy—the MILO Study
por: Finucane, Elaine M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Can learning about trials be child’s play? A qualitative exploration of the ‘Schools Teaching Awareness of Randomised Trials’ (START) initiative
por: Biesty, Linda, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention
por: Lutomski, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
por: Finucane, Elaine, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison to not reading a book in bed? The People’s Trial—an online, pragmatic, randomised trial
por: Finucane, Elaine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
por: Newman, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A concept analysis of ‘trial recruitment’ using the hybrid model
por: Delaney, Hannah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Developing a core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes—a study protocol
por: Kgosidialwa, Oratile, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Sexual transmission of Hepatitis C Virus infection in a heterosexual population: A systematic review
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Metabolic follow-up at one year and beyond of women with gestational diabetes treated with insulin and/or oral hypoglycaemic agents: study protocol for the identification of a core outcomes set using a Delphi survey
por: Bogdanet, Delia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Identifying and prioritising midwifery care process metrics and indicators: a Delphi survey and stakeholder consensus process
por: Devane, Declan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sharing space at the research table: exploring public and patient involvement in a methodology priority setting partnership
por: Burke, Nikita N., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Gestational diabetes prevention and treatment: a protocol for developing core outcome sets
por: Egan, Aoife Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Study within a review (SWAR)
por: Devane, Declan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Overcoming bias and systematic errors in next generation sequencing data
por: Taub, Margaret A, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Trial forge: a systematic approach to making trials more efficient
por: Treweek, Shaun
Publicado: (2013)

What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study
por: Brunsdon, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outcomes and outcomes measurements used in intervention studies of pelvic girdle pain and lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Indexed PCR Primers Induce Template-Specific Bias in Large-Scale DNA Sequencing Studies
por: O’Donnell, James L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions
por: Smith, Valerie, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Exploring factors that influence HRQoL for people living with Parkinson’s in one region of Ireland: A cross-sectional study
por: Cassidy, Irene, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

SAMStat: monitoring biases in next generation sequencing data
por: Lassmann, Timo, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Learning from Cochrane systematic reviews: what improvements do these suggest for the design of trials?
por: Pirosca, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

COHESION: core outcomes in neonatal encephalopathy (protocol)
por: Quirke, Fiona A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial
por: Quirke, Fiona A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Professionals’ views of fetal monitoring during labour: a systematic review and thematic analysis
por: Smith, Valerie, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The lived experience of fibromyalgia in female patients, a phenomenological study
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework—a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve
por: Treweek, Shaun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Detection and Removal of Biases in the Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing Reads
por: Schwartz, Schraga, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli
por: Gunasekera, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Recruitment to trials - why is it hard and how might we make it less so?
por: Treweek, Shaun
Publicado: (2011)

The potential of electronic medical record systems to support quality improvement work and research in Norwegian general practice
por: Treweek, Shaun
Publicado: (2003)

Trial forge – working together to make trials more efficient
por: Treweek, Shaun
Publicado: (2015)

Protocols—more structure, less ‘Wuthering Heights’
por: Treweek, Shaun
Publicado: (2019)

A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage
por: Hennessy, Marita, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study
por: Healy, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reducing ligation bias of small RNAs in libraries for next generation sequencing
por: Sorefan, Karim, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_69s84cu3c9ql2vkk02er31j2qg