Cargando…
Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training
BACKGROUND: Oncological patients often feel left out of important treatment decisions. However, when physicians engage them in shared decision-making (SDM), patients benefit in many ways and the situation is improved. SDM can effectively be taught to physicians, but participation barriers for SDM ph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3112-7 |
_version_ | 1783385828642258944 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Nicole Gschwendtner, Kathrin M. Dwinger, Sarah Bergelt, Corinna Eich, Wolfgang Härter, Martin Bieber, Christiane |
author_facet | Müller, Nicole Gschwendtner, Kathrin M. Dwinger, Sarah Bergelt, Corinna Eich, Wolfgang Härter, Martin Bieber, Christiane |
author_sort | Müller, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oncological patients often feel left out of important treatment decisions. However, when physicians engage them in shared decision-making (SDM), patients benefit in many ways and the situation is improved. SDM can effectively be taught to physicians, but participation barriers for SDM physician group trainings are high, making it hard to convince physicians to participate. With this in mind, we aim to develop and evaluate two new dissemination strategies for a brief, SDM training program based upon a proven SDM group-training concept: an individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training (IG I) and a web-based interactive SDM online training (IG II). We aim to analyze which improvements can be achieved by IG I and II compared to a control group (CG) in physician SDM competence and performance as well as the impact on the physician-patient relationship. Furthermore, we analyze differences in satisfaction concerning the two dissemination strategies by means of a training evaluation. METHODS/DESIGN: We examine – based on a three-armed randomized controlled trial (IG I, IG II, CG) – the effectiveness of two new dissemination strategies for a SDM training program compared to a CG receiving no SDM training (voluntary access to SDM training as an incentive for participation after completion of the study). We aim to include 162 physicians randomized to one of the three arms. There will be two assessment points in time (before intervention: T(0) and post-training: T(1)). The main outcome is the SDM competence of physicians as measured by an established observational assessment rating system (OPTION-12) by means of consultations with Standardized Patients. Standardized Patients are individuals trained to act as “real” patients. Secondary outcome measures are the SDM performance (SDM-Q-9) and the Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient-Interaction (QQPPI) both rated by Standardized Patients as well as the physicians’ training evaluation. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness and acceptability of two new dissemination strategies for a brief, SDM training program for physicians. Opportunities and challenges regarding implementation in daily routines will be discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02674360. Prospectively registered on 4 February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3112-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6323749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63237492019-01-10 Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training Müller, Nicole Gschwendtner, Kathrin M. Dwinger, Sarah Bergelt, Corinna Eich, Wolfgang Härter, Martin Bieber, Christiane Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Oncological patients often feel left out of important treatment decisions. However, when physicians engage them in shared decision-making (SDM), patients benefit in many ways and the situation is improved. SDM can effectively be taught to physicians, but participation barriers for SDM physician group trainings are high, making it hard to convince physicians to participate. With this in mind, we aim to develop and evaluate two new dissemination strategies for a brief, SDM training program based upon a proven SDM group-training concept: an individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training (IG I) and a web-based interactive SDM online training (IG II). We aim to analyze which improvements can be achieved by IG I and II compared to a control group (CG) in physician SDM competence and performance as well as the impact on the physician-patient relationship. Furthermore, we analyze differences in satisfaction concerning the two dissemination strategies by means of a training evaluation. METHODS/DESIGN: We examine – based on a three-armed randomized controlled trial (IG I, IG II, CG) – the effectiveness of two new dissemination strategies for a SDM training program compared to a CG receiving no SDM training (voluntary access to SDM training as an incentive for participation after completion of the study). We aim to include 162 physicians randomized to one of the three arms. There will be two assessment points in time (before intervention: T(0) and post-training: T(1)). The main outcome is the SDM competence of physicians as measured by an established observational assessment rating system (OPTION-12) by means of consultations with Standardized Patients. Standardized Patients are individuals trained to act as “real” patients. Secondary outcome measures are the SDM performance (SDM-Q-9) and the Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient-Interaction (QQPPI) both rated by Standardized Patients as well as the physicians’ training evaluation. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness and acceptability of two new dissemination strategies for a brief, SDM training program for physicians. Opportunities and challenges regarding implementation in daily routines will be discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02674360. Prospectively registered on 4 February 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3112-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6323749/ /pubmed/30616653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3112-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Müller, Nicole Gschwendtner, Kathrin M. Dwinger, Sarah Bergelt, Corinna Eich, Wolfgang Härter, Martin Bieber, Christiane Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training |
title | Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training |
title_full | Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training |
title_fullStr | Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training |
title_short | Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (SDM) training for oncologists: web-based interactive SDM online-training versus individualized context-based SDM face-to-face training |
title_sort | study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on two new dissemination strategies for a brief, shared-decision-making (sdm) training for oncologists: web-based interactive sdm online-training versus individualized context-based sdm face-to-face training |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30616653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3112-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullernicole studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining AT gschwendtnerkathrinm studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining AT dwingersarah studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining AT bergeltcorinna studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining AT eichwolfgang studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining AT hartermartin studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining AT bieberchristiane studyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontwonewdisseminationstrategiesforabriefshareddecisionmakingsdmtrainingforoncologistswebbasedinteractivesdmonlinetrainingversusindividualizedcontextbasedsdmfacetofacetraining |