Cargando…

Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series

BACKGROUND: With the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted treatments (TT), there have been unprecedented response rates and survival in advanced melanoma, but the optimal sequencing of these two treatments modalities is unknown. Combining or sequencing these agents could potentially r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naqash, Abdul Rafeh, File, Danielle M., Ziemer, Carolyn M., Whang, Young E., Landman, Paula, Googe, Paul B., Collichio, Frances A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0475-y
_version_ 1783385850389725184
author Naqash, Abdul Rafeh
File, Danielle M.
Ziemer, Carolyn M.
Whang, Young E.
Landman, Paula
Googe, Paul B.
Collichio, Frances A.
author_facet Naqash, Abdul Rafeh
File, Danielle M.
Ziemer, Carolyn M.
Whang, Young E.
Landman, Paula
Googe, Paul B.
Collichio, Frances A.
author_sort Naqash, Abdul Rafeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted treatments (TT), there have been unprecedented response rates and survival in advanced melanoma, but the optimal sequencing of these two treatments modalities is unknown. Combining or sequencing these agents could potentially result in unique toxicities. Cutaneous adverse events (CAE) after sequential exposure to these agents represents one toxicity that needs further description. METHODS: After retrospectively reviewing charts of patients from 2015 to 2018, we identified six patients who experienced CAEs after recent exposure to sequential immunotherapy and TT or vice versa for the treatment for metastatic melanoma at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Skin biopsies were available in five patients. RESULTS: Five patients received TT after immunotherapy, and one patient received immunotherapy after TT. TT consisted of vemurafenib/cobimetinib (V/C) in five patients with four patients starting V/C immediately before manifesting with a CAE. In patients receiving V/C after immunotherapy, the median time from beginning V/C to development of CAE was 14.5 days. The clinical presentation of diffuse morbilliform rash, fevers, hypotension, and end-organ damage raised concern for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Histopathological features of lympho-eosinophilic infiltrate were supportive of a drug eruption. Immunotherapy or TT were re-initiated in five patients within 1–8 weeks after resolution of the index CAE. This resulted in two patients re-experiencing the CAE. Both of these patients were off prednisone at the time of therapy re-initiation, whereas none of the patients who were restarted on targeted therapy with a steroid overlap had a rash recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment using immunotherapy and TT, especially the sequence of V/C after immunotherapy appears to be the most common trigger for CAE with a median time to onset of approximately 2 weeks. Although the clinical presentation of these CAEs can be dramatic, they respond well to prednisone therapy. This unique presentation suggests that it may be reasonably safe to re-challenge certain patients with a steroid overlap after rash resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6323838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63238382019-01-11 Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series Naqash, Abdul Rafeh File, Danielle M. Ziemer, Carolyn M. Whang, Young E. Landman, Paula Googe, Paul B. Collichio, Frances A. J Immunother Cancer Case Report BACKGROUND: With the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted treatments (TT), there have been unprecedented response rates and survival in advanced melanoma, but the optimal sequencing of these two treatments modalities is unknown. Combining or sequencing these agents could potentially result in unique toxicities. Cutaneous adverse events (CAE) after sequential exposure to these agents represents one toxicity that needs further description. METHODS: After retrospectively reviewing charts of patients from 2015 to 2018, we identified six patients who experienced CAEs after recent exposure to sequential immunotherapy and TT or vice versa for the treatment for metastatic melanoma at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Skin biopsies were available in five patients. RESULTS: Five patients received TT after immunotherapy, and one patient received immunotherapy after TT. TT consisted of vemurafenib/cobimetinib (V/C) in five patients with four patients starting V/C immediately before manifesting with a CAE. In patients receiving V/C after immunotherapy, the median time from beginning V/C to development of CAE was 14.5 days. The clinical presentation of diffuse morbilliform rash, fevers, hypotension, and end-organ damage raised concern for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Histopathological features of lympho-eosinophilic infiltrate were supportive of a drug eruption. Immunotherapy or TT were re-initiated in five patients within 1–8 weeks after resolution of the index CAE. This resulted in two patients re-experiencing the CAE. Both of these patients were off prednisone at the time of therapy re-initiation, whereas none of the patients who were restarted on targeted therapy with a steroid overlap had a rash recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment using immunotherapy and TT, especially the sequence of V/C after immunotherapy appears to be the most common trigger for CAE with a median time to onset of approximately 2 weeks. Although the clinical presentation of these CAEs can be dramatic, they respond well to prednisone therapy. This unique presentation suggests that it may be reasonably safe to re-challenge certain patients with a steroid overlap after rash resolution. BioMed Central 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6323838/ /pubmed/30621779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0475-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Naqash, Abdul Rafeh
File, Danielle M.
Ziemer, Carolyn M.
Whang, Young E.
Landman, Paula
Googe, Paul B.
Collichio, Frances A.
Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series
title Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series
title_full Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series
title_fullStr Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series
title_short Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. A single-institutional case-series
title_sort cutaneous adverse reactions in b-raf positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with b-raf/mek inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. a single-institutional case-series
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0475-y
work_keys_str_mv AT naqashabdulrafeh cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries
AT filedaniellem cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries
AT ziemercarolynm cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries
AT whangyounge cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries
AT landmanpaula cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries
AT googepaulb cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries
AT collichiofrancesa cutaneousadversereactionsinbrafpositivemetastaticmelanomafollowingsequentialtreatmentwithbrafmekinhibitorsandimmunecheckpointblockadeorviceversaasingleinstitutionalcaseseries