Cargando…
Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials
IMPORTANCE: As medical knowledge and clinical practice rapidly evolve over time, there is an imperative to publish results of clinical trials in a timely way and reduce unnecessary delays. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the age of clinical trial data at the time of publication in journals with a high i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1065 |
_version_ | 1783385935166046208 |
---|---|
author | Welsh, John Lu, Yuan Dhruva, Sanket S. Bikdeli, Behnood Desai, Nihar R. Benchetrit, Liliya Zimmerman, Chloe O. Mu, Lin Ross, Joseph S. Krumholz, Harlan M. |
author_facet | Welsh, John Lu, Yuan Dhruva, Sanket S. Bikdeli, Behnood Desai, Nihar R. Benchetrit, Liliya Zimmerman, Chloe O. Mu, Lin Ross, Joseph S. Krumholz, Harlan M. |
author_sort | Welsh, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: As medical knowledge and clinical practice rapidly evolve over time, there is an imperative to publish results of clinical trials in a timely way and reduce unnecessary delays. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the age of clinical trial data at the time of publication in journals with a high impact factor and highlight the time from final data collection to publication. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of all randomized clinical trials published from January 1 through December 31, 2015, in the Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to assess whether data age (adjusted for follow-up duration) and publication time were associated with trial characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome measures were the midpoint of data collection until publication (data age), the time from first participant enrollment to last participant enrollment (enrollment time), and the time from final data collection to publication (publication time). RESULTS: There were 341 clinical trials published in 2015 by the 6 journals. For assessment of the primary end point, 37 trials (10.9%) had a follow-up period of less than 1 month, 172 trials (50.4%) had a follow-up period of 1 month to 1 year, and 132 trials (38.7%) had a follow-up period of more than 1 year. For all trials, the median data age at publication was 33.9 months (interquartile range, 23.5-46.3 months). Among trials with a follow-up period of 1 month or less, the median data age was 30.6 months (interquartile range, 18.6-39.0 months). A total of 68 trials (19.9%) required more than 4 years to complete enrollment. The median time from the completion of data collection to publication was 14.8 months (interquartile range, 7.4-22.2 months); publication time was 2 or more years in 63 trials (18.5%). In multivariable regression analyses adjusted for follow-up time, inconclusive or unfavorable trial results were significantly associated with older data age (>235 days). Compared with trials funded only by private industry, trials funded by government were associated with a significantly longer time to publication (>180 days). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinical trials in journals with a high impact factor were published with a median data age of nearly 3 years. For a substantial proportion of studies, time for enrollment and time from completion of data collection to publication were quite long, indicating marked opportunities for improvement in clinical trials to reduce data age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6324269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63242692019-01-22 Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials Welsh, John Lu, Yuan Dhruva, Sanket S. Bikdeli, Behnood Desai, Nihar R. Benchetrit, Liliya Zimmerman, Chloe O. Mu, Lin Ross, Joseph S. Krumholz, Harlan M. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: As medical knowledge and clinical practice rapidly evolve over time, there is an imperative to publish results of clinical trials in a timely way and reduce unnecessary delays. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the age of clinical trial data at the time of publication in journals with a high impact factor and highlight the time from final data collection to publication. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of all randomized clinical trials published from January 1 through December 31, 2015, in the Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to assess whether data age (adjusted for follow-up duration) and publication time were associated with trial characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The outcome measures were the midpoint of data collection until publication (data age), the time from first participant enrollment to last participant enrollment (enrollment time), and the time from final data collection to publication (publication time). RESULTS: There were 341 clinical trials published in 2015 by the 6 journals. For assessment of the primary end point, 37 trials (10.9%) had a follow-up period of less than 1 month, 172 trials (50.4%) had a follow-up period of 1 month to 1 year, and 132 trials (38.7%) had a follow-up period of more than 1 year. For all trials, the median data age at publication was 33.9 months (interquartile range, 23.5-46.3 months). Among trials with a follow-up period of 1 month or less, the median data age was 30.6 months (interquartile range, 18.6-39.0 months). A total of 68 trials (19.9%) required more than 4 years to complete enrollment. The median time from the completion of data collection to publication was 14.8 months (interquartile range, 7.4-22.2 months); publication time was 2 or more years in 63 trials (18.5%). In multivariable regression analyses adjusted for follow-up time, inconclusive or unfavorable trial results were significantly associated with older data age (>235 days). Compared with trials funded only by private industry, trials funded by government were associated with a significantly longer time to publication (>180 days). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinical trials in journals with a high impact factor were published with a median data age of nearly 3 years. For a substantial proportion of studies, time for enrollment and time from completion of data collection to publication were quite long, indicating marked opportunities for improvement in clinical trials to reduce data age. American Medical Association 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6324269/ /pubmed/30646100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1065 Text en Copyright 2018 Welsh J et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Welsh, John Lu, Yuan Dhruva, Sanket S. Bikdeli, Behnood Desai, Nihar R. Benchetrit, Liliya Zimmerman, Chloe O. Mu, Lin Ross, Joseph S. Krumholz, Harlan M. Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials |
title | Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials |
title_full | Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials |
title_short | Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials |
title_sort | age of data at the time of publication of contemporary clinical trials |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT welshjohn ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT luyuan ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT dhruvasankets ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT bikdelibehnood ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT desainiharr ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT benchetritliliya ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT zimmermanchloeo ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT mulin ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT rossjosephs ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials AT krumholzharlanm ageofdataatthetimeofpublicationofcontemporaryclinicaltrials |