Cargando…

Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol

IMPORTANCE: Fragility fracture is a major health issue because of the accompanying morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Despite the high cost to society and personal cost to affected individuals, secondary fracture prevention is suboptimal in Norway, mainly because most patients with osteoporot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreasen, Camilla, Solberg, Lene B., Basso, Trude, Borgen, Tove T., Dahl, Cecilie, Wisløff, Torbjørn, Hagen, Gunhild, Apalset, Ellen M., Gjertsen, Jan-Erik, Figved, Wender, Hübschle, Lars M., Stutzer, Jens M., Elvenes, Jan, Joakimsen, Ragnar M., Syversen, Unni, Eriksen, Erik F., Nordsletten, Lars, Frihagen, Frede, Omsland, Tone K., Bjørnerem, Åshild
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5701
_version_ 1783385952081674240
author Andreasen, Camilla
Solberg, Lene B.
Basso, Trude
Borgen, Tove T.
Dahl, Cecilie
Wisløff, Torbjørn
Hagen, Gunhild
Apalset, Ellen M.
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Figved, Wender
Hübschle, Lars M.
Stutzer, Jens M.
Elvenes, Jan
Joakimsen, Ragnar M.
Syversen, Unni
Eriksen, Erik F.
Nordsletten, Lars
Frihagen, Frede
Omsland, Tone K.
Bjørnerem, Åshild
author_facet Andreasen, Camilla
Solberg, Lene B.
Basso, Trude
Borgen, Tove T.
Dahl, Cecilie
Wisløff, Torbjørn
Hagen, Gunhild
Apalset, Ellen M.
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Figved, Wender
Hübschle, Lars M.
Stutzer, Jens M.
Elvenes, Jan
Joakimsen, Ragnar M.
Syversen, Unni
Eriksen, Erik F.
Nordsletten, Lars
Frihagen, Frede
Omsland, Tone K.
Bjørnerem, Åshild
author_sort Andreasen, Camilla
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Fragility fracture is a major health issue because of the accompanying morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Despite the high cost to society and personal cost to affected individuals, secondary fracture prevention is suboptimal in Norway, mainly because most patients with osteoporotic fractures do not receive treatment with antiosteoporotic drugs after fracture repair. OBJECTIVES: To improve secondary fracture prevention by introducing a standardized intervention program and to investigate the effect of the program on the rate of subsequent fractures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Trial protocol of the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT), an ongoing, stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial in 7 hospitals in Norway. The participating hospitals were cluster randomized to an intervention starting date: May 1, 2015; September 1, 2015; and January 1, 2016. Follow-up is through December 31, 2019. The outcome data were merged from national registries of women and men 50 years and older with a recent fragility fracture treated at 1 of the 7 hospitals. DISCUSSION: The NoFRACT trial is intended to enroll 82 000 patients (intervention period, 26 000 patients; control period, 56 000 patients), of whom 23 578 are currently enrolled by January 2018. Interventions include a standardized program for identification, assessment, and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with a fragility fracture that is led by a trained coordinating nurse. The primary outcome is rate of subsequent fracture (per 10 000 person-years) based on national registry data. Outcomes before (2008-2015; control period) and after (2015-2019; intervention period) the intervention will be compared, and each hospital will act as its own control. Use of outcomes from national registry data means that all patients are included in the analysis regardless of whether they are exposed to the intervention (intention to treat). A sensitivity analysis with a transition window will be performed to mitigate possible within-cluster contamination. RESULTS: Results are planned to be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national, and international conferences. CONCLUSIONS: By introducing a standardized intervention program for assessment and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures, we expect to document reduced rates of subsequent fractures and fracture-related mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02536898
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6324344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63243442019-01-22 Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol Andreasen, Camilla Solberg, Lene B. Basso, Trude Borgen, Tove T. Dahl, Cecilie Wisløff, Torbjørn Hagen, Gunhild Apalset, Ellen M. Gjertsen, Jan-Erik Figved, Wender Hübschle, Lars M. Stutzer, Jens M. Elvenes, Jan Joakimsen, Ragnar M. Syversen, Unni Eriksen, Erik F. Nordsletten, Lars Frihagen, Frede Omsland, Tone K. Bjørnerem, Åshild JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Fragility fracture is a major health issue because of the accompanying morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Despite the high cost to society and personal cost to affected individuals, secondary fracture prevention is suboptimal in Norway, mainly because most patients with osteoporotic fractures do not receive treatment with antiosteoporotic drugs after fracture repair. OBJECTIVES: To improve secondary fracture prevention by introducing a standardized intervention program and to investigate the effect of the program on the rate of subsequent fractures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Trial protocol of the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT), an ongoing, stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial in 7 hospitals in Norway. The participating hospitals were cluster randomized to an intervention starting date: May 1, 2015; September 1, 2015; and January 1, 2016. Follow-up is through December 31, 2019. The outcome data were merged from national registries of women and men 50 years and older with a recent fragility fracture treated at 1 of the 7 hospitals. DISCUSSION: The NoFRACT trial is intended to enroll 82 000 patients (intervention period, 26 000 patients; control period, 56 000 patients), of whom 23 578 are currently enrolled by January 2018. Interventions include a standardized program for identification, assessment, and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with a fragility fracture that is led by a trained coordinating nurse. The primary outcome is rate of subsequent fracture (per 10 000 person-years) based on national registry data. Outcomes before (2008-2015; control period) and after (2015-2019; intervention period) the intervention will be compared, and each hospital will act as its own control. Use of outcomes from national registry data means that all patients are included in the analysis regardless of whether they are exposed to the intervention (intention to treat). A sensitivity analysis with a transition window will be performed to mitigate possible within-cluster contamination. RESULTS: Results are planned to be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national, and international conferences. CONCLUSIONS: By introducing a standardized intervention program for assessment and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures, we expect to document reduced rates of subsequent fractures and fracture-related mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02536898 American Medical Association 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6324344/ /pubmed/30646281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5701 Text en Copyright 2018 Andreasen C et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Andreasen, Camilla
Solberg, Lene B.
Basso, Trude
Borgen, Tove T.
Dahl, Cecilie
Wisløff, Torbjørn
Hagen, Gunhild
Apalset, Ellen M.
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Figved, Wender
Hübschle, Lars M.
Stutzer, Jens M.
Elvenes, Jan
Joakimsen, Ragnar M.
Syversen, Unni
Eriksen, Erik F.
Nordsletten, Lars
Frihagen, Frede
Omsland, Tone K.
Bjørnerem, Åshild
Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol
title Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol
title_full Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol
title_fullStr Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol
title_short Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol
title_sort effect of a fracture liaison service on the rate of subsequent fracture among patients with a fragility fracture in the norwegian capture the fracture initiative (nofract): a trial protocol
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5701
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasencamilla effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT solbergleneb effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT bassotrude effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT borgentovet effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT dahlcecilie effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT wisløfftorbjørn effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT hagengunhild effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT apalsetellenm effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT gjertsenjanerik effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT figvedwender effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT hubschlelarsm effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT stutzerjensm effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT elvenesjan effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT joakimsenragnarm effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT syversenunni effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT eriksenerikf effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT nordslettenlars effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT frihagenfrede effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT omslandtonek effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol
AT bjørneremashild effectofafractureliaisonserviceontherateofsubsequentfractureamongpatientswithafragilityfractureinthenorwegiancapturethefractureinitiativenofractatrialprotocol