Cargando…

The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version

BACKGROUND: When developing a mobile health app, users’ perception of the technology should preferably be evaluated. However, few standardized and validated questionnaires measuring acceptability are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Norwegian version of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torbjørnsen, Astrid, Småstuen, Milada C, Jenum, Anne Karen, Årsand, Eirik, Ribu, Lis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578191
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10255
_version_ 1783385991678001152
author Torbjørnsen, Astrid
Småstuen, Milada C
Jenum, Anne Karen
Årsand, Eirik
Ribu, Lis
author_facet Torbjørnsen, Astrid
Småstuen, Milada C
Jenum, Anne Karen
Årsand, Eirik
Ribu, Lis
author_sort Torbjørnsen, Astrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When developing a mobile health app, users’ perception of the technology should preferably be evaluated. However, few standardized and validated questionnaires measuring acceptability are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Norwegian version of the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ). METHODS: Persons with type 2 diabetes randomized to the intervention groups of the RENEWING HEALTH study used a diabetes diary app. At the one-year follow-up, participants in the intervention groups (n=75) completed the self-reported instrument SUTAQ to measure the acceptability of the equipment. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis for evaluating the fit of the original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ. RESULTS: We confirmed only 2 of the original 5 factors of the SUTAQ, perceived benefit and care personnel concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ was not confirmed in the Norwegian study, indicating that more research is needed to tailor the questionnaire to better reflect the Norwegian setting. However, a small sample size prevented us from drawing firm conclusions about the translated questionnaire.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6324518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63245182019-01-28 The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version Torbjørnsen, Astrid Småstuen, Milada C Jenum, Anne Karen Årsand, Eirik Ribu, Lis JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: When developing a mobile health app, users’ perception of the technology should preferably be evaluated. However, few standardized and validated questionnaires measuring acceptability are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Norwegian version of the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ). METHODS: Persons with type 2 diabetes randomized to the intervention groups of the RENEWING HEALTH study used a diabetes diary app. At the one-year follow-up, participants in the intervention groups (n=75) completed the self-reported instrument SUTAQ to measure the acceptability of the equipment. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis for evaluating the fit of the original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ. RESULTS: We confirmed only 2 of the original 5 factors of the SUTAQ, perceived benefit and care personnel concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ was not confirmed in the Norwegian study, indicating that more research is needed to tailor the questionnaire to better reflect the Norwegian setting. However, a small sample size prevented us from drawing firm conclusions about the translated questionnaire. JMIR Publications 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6324518/ /pubmed/30578191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10255 Text en ©Astrid Torbjørnsen, Milada C Småstuen, Anne Karen Jenum, Eirik Årsand, Lis Ribu. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 21.12.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Torbjørnsen, Astrid
Småstuen, Milada C
Jenum, Anne Karen
Årsand, Eirik
Ribu, Lis
The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
title The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
title_full The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
title_fullStr The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
title_full_unstemmed The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
title_short The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
title_sort service user technology acceptability questionnaire: psychometric evaluation of the norwegian version
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578191
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10255
work_keys_str_mv AT torbjørnsenastrid theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT smastuenmiladac theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT jenumannekaren theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT arsandeirik theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT ribulis theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT torbjørnsenastrid serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT smastuenmiladac serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT jenumannekaren serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT arsandeirik serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion
AT ribulis serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion