Cargando…
The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version
BACKGROUND: When developing a mobile health app, users’ perception of the technology should preferably be evaluated. However, few standardized and validated questionnaires measuring acceptability are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Norwegian version of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10255 |
_version_ | 1783385991678001152 |
---|---|
author | Torbjørnsen, Astrid Småstuen, Milada C Jenum, Anne Karen Årsand, Eirik Ribu, Lis |
author_facet | Torbjørnsen, Astrid Småstuen, Milada C Jenum, Anne Karen Årsand, Eirik Ribu, Lis |
author_sort | Torbjørnsen, Astrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When developing a mobile health app, users’ perception of the technology should preferably be evaluated. However, few standardized and validated questionnaires measuring acceptability are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Norwegian version of the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ). METHODS: Persons with type 2 diabetes randomized to the intervention groups of the RENEWING HEALTH study used a diabetes diary app. At the one-year follow-up, participants in the intervention groups (n=75) completed the self-reported instrument SUTAQ to measure the acceptability of the equipment. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis for evaluating the fit of the original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ. RESULTS: We confirmed only 2 of the original 5 factors of the SUTAQ, perceived benefit and care personnel concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ was not confirmed in the Norwegian study, indicating that more research is needed to tailor the questionnaire to better reflect the Norwegian setting. However, a small sample size prevented us from drawing firm conclusions about the translated questionnaire. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6324518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63245182019-01-28 The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version Torbjørnsen, Astrid Småstuen, Milada C Jenum, Anne Karen Årsand, Eirik Ribu, Lis JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: When developing a mobile health app, users’ perception of the technology should preferably be evaluated. However, few standardized and validated questionnaires measuring acceptability are available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Norwegian version of the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ). METHODS: Persons with type 2 diabetes randomized to the intervention groups of the RENEWING HEALTH study used a diabetes diary app. At the one-year follow-up, participants in the intervention groups (n=75) completed the self-reported instrument SUTAQ to measure the acceptability of the equipment. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis for evaluating the fit of the original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ. RESULTS: We confirmed only 2 of the original 5 factors of the SUTAQ, perceived benefit and care personnel concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The original five-factor structure of the SUTAQ was not confirmed in the Norwegian study, indicating that more research is needed to tailor the questionnaire to better reflect the Norwegian setting. However, a small sample size prevented us from drawing firm conclusions about the translated questionnaire. JMIR Publications 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6324518/ /pubmed/30578191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10255 Text en ©Astrid Torbjørnsen, Milada C Småstuen, Anne Karen Jenum, Eirik Årsand, Lis Ribu. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 21.12.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Torbjørnsen, Astrid Småstuen, Milada C Jenum, Anne Karen Årsand, Eirik Ribu, Lis The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version |
title | The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version |
title_full | The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version |
title_fullStr | The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version |
title_full_unstemmed | The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version |
title_short | The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version |
title_sort | service user technology acceptability questionnaire: psychometric evaluation of the norwegian version |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30578191 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torbjørnsenastrid theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT smastuenmiladac theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT jenumannekaren theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT arsandeirik theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT ribulis theserviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT torbjørnsenastrid serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT smastuenmiladac serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT jenumannekaren serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT arsandeirik serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion AT ribulis serviceusertechnologyacceptabilityquestionnairepsychometricevaluationofthenorwegianversion |