Cargando…

Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: It is critically important to evaluate the effect of nonpharmacological treatments on low back pain and associated disability. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of chiropractic care to usual medical care results in better pain relief and pain-related function when compared wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goertz, Christine M., Long, Cynthia R., Vining, Robert D., Pohlman, Katherine A., Walter, Joan, Coulter, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0105
_version_ 1783385993603186688
author Goertz, Christine M.
Long, Cynthia R.
Vining, Robert D.
Pohlman, Katherine A.
Walter, Joan
Coulter, Ian
author_facet Goertz, Christine M.
Long, Cynthia R.
Vining, Robert D.
Pohlman, Katherine A.
Walter, Joan
Coulter, Ian
author_sort Goertz, Christine M.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: It is critically important to evaluate the effect of nonpharmacological treatments on low back pain and associated disability. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of chiropractic care to usual medical care results in better pain relief and pain-related function when compared with usual medical care alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 3-site pragmatic comparative effectiveness clinical trial using adaptive allocation was conducted from September 28, 2012, to February 13, 2016, at 2 large military medical centers in major metropolitan areas and 1 smaller hospital at a military training site. Eligible participants were active-duty US service members aged 18 to 50 years with low back pain from a musculoskeletal source. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention period was 6 weeks. Usual medical care included self-care, medications, physical therapy, and pain clinic referral. Chiropractic care included spinal manipulative therapy in the low back and adjacent regions and additional therapeutic procedures such as rehabilitative exercise, cryotherapy, superficial heat, and other manual therapies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coprimary outcomes were low back pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [no low back pain] to 10 [worst possible low back pain]) and disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; scores ranging from 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included perceived improvement, satisfaction (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [not at all satisfied] to 10 [extremely satisfied]), and medication use. The coprimary outcomes were modeled with linear mixed-effects regression over baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12. RESULTS: Of the 806 screened patients who were recruited through either clinician referrals or self-referrals, 750 were enrolled (250 at each site). The mean (SD) participant age was 30.9 (8.7) years, 175 participants (23.3%) were female, and 243 participants (32.4%) were nonwhite. Statistically significant site × time × group interactions were found in all models. Adjusted mean differences in scores at week 6 were statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care compared with usual medical care alone overall for low back pain intensity (mean difference, −1.1; 95% CI, −1.4 to −0.7), disability (mean difference, −2.2; 95% CI, −3.1 to −1.2), and satisfaction (mean difference, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.8) as well as at each site. Adjusted odd ratios at week 6 were also statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care overall for perceived improvement (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.25) and self-reported pain medication use (odds ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97). No serious related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Chiropractic care, when added to usual medical care, resulted in moderate short-term improvements in low back pain intensity and disability in active-duty military personnel. This trial provides additional support for the inclusion of chiropractic care as a component of multidisciplinary health care for low back pain, as currently recommended in existing guidelines. However, study limitations illustrate that further research is needed to understand longer-term outcomes as well as how patient heterogeneity and intervention variations affect patient responses to chiropractic care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01692275
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6324527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63245272019-01-22 Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial Goertz, Christine M. Long, Cynthia R. Vining, Robert D. Pohlman, Katherine A. Walter, Joan Coulter, Ian JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: It is critically important to evaluate the effect of nonpharmacological treatments on low back pain and associated disability. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of chiropractic care to usual medical care results in better pain relief and pain-related function when compared with usual medical care alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 3-site pragmatic comparative effectiveness clinical trial using adaptive allocation was conducted from September 28, 2012, to February 13, 2016, at 2 large military medical centers in major metropolitan areas and 1 smaller hospital at a military training site. Eligible participants were active-duty US service members aged 18 to 50 years with low back pain from a musculoskeletal source. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention period was 6 weeks. Usual medical care included self-care, medications, physical therapy, and pain clinic referral. Chiropractic care included spinal manipulative therapy in the low back and adjacent regions and additional therapeutic procedures such as rehabilitative exercise, cryotherapy, superficial heat, and other manual therapies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Coprimary outcomes were low back pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [no low back pain] to 10 [worst possible low back pain]) and disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; scores ranging from 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included perceived improvement, satisfaction (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [not at all satisfied] to 10 [extremely satisfied]), and medication use. The coprimary outcomes were modeled with linear mixed-effects regression over baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12. RESULTS: Of the 806 screened patients who were recruited through either clinician referrals or self-referrals, 750 were enrolled (250 at each site). The mean (SD) participant age was 30.9 (8.7) years, 175 participants (23.3%) were female, and 243 participants (32.4%) were nonwhite. Statistically significant site × time × group interactions were found in all models. Adjusted mean differences in scores at week 6 were statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care compared with usual medical care alone overall for low back pain intensity (mean difference, −1.1; 95% CI, −1.4 to −0.7), disability (mean difference, −2.2; 95% CI, −3.1 to −1.2), and satisfaction (mean difference, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.8) as well as at each site. Adjusted odd ratios at week 6 were also statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care overall for perceived improvement (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.25) and self-reported pain medication use (odds ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97). No serious related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Chiropractic care, when added to usual medical care, resulted in moderate short-term improvements in low back pain intensity and disability in active-duty military personnel. This trial provides additional support for the inclusion of chiropractic care as a component of multidisciplinary health care for low back pain, as currently recommended in existing guidelines. However, study limitations illustrate that further research is needed to understand longer-term outcomes as well as how patient heterogeneity and intervention variations affect patient responses to chiropractic care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01692275 American Medical Association 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6324527/ /pubmed/30646047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0105 Text en Copyright 2018 Goertz CM et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Goertz, Christine M.
Long, Cynthia R.
Vining, Robert D.
Pohlman, Katherine A.
Walter, Joan
Coulter, Ian
Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial
title Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial
title_full Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial
title_short Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial
title_sort effect of usual medical care plus chiropractic care vs usual medical care alone on pain and disability among us service members with low back pain: a comparative effectiveness clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0105
work_keys_str_mv AT goertzchristinem effectofusualmedicalcarepluschiropracticcarevsusualmedicalcarealoneonpainanddisabilityamongusservicememberswithlowbackpainacomparativeeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT longcynthiar effectofusualmedicalcarepluschiropracticcarevsusualmedicalcarealoneonpainanddisabilityamongusservicememberswithlowbackpainacomparativeeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT viningrobertd effectofusualmedicalcarepluschiropracticcarevsusualmedicalcarealoneonpainanddisabilityamongusservicememberswithlowbackpainacomparativeeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT pohlmankatherinea effectofusualmedicalcarepluschiropracticcarevsusualmedicalcarealoneonpainanddisabilityamongusservicememberswithlowbackpainacomparativeeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT walterjoan effectofusualmedicalcarepluschiropracticcarevsusualmedicalcarealoneonpainanddisabilityamongusservicememberswithlowbackpainacomparativeeffectivenessclinicaltrial
AT coulterian effectofusualmedicalcarepluschiropracticcarevsusualmedicalcarealoneonpainanddisabilityamongusservicememberswithlowbackpainacomparativeeffectivenessclinicaltrial