Cargando…

Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty

IMPORTANCE: Competency-based medical education is now established in health professions training. However, critics stress that there is a lack of published outcomes for competency-based medical education or competency-based assessment tools. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether competency-based assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Shelley, Binczyk, Natalia M., Hamza, Deena M., Schipper, Shirley, Humphries, Paul, Nichols, Darren, Donoff, Michel G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4581
_version_ 1783386000101212160
author Ross, Shelley
Binczyk, Natalia M.
Hamza, Deena M.
Schipper, Shirley
Humphries, Paul
Nichols, Darren
Donoff, Michel G.
author_facet Ross, Shelley
Binczyk, Natalia M.
Hamza, Deena M.
Schipper, Shirley
Humphries, Paul
Nichols, Darren
Donoff, Michel G.
author_sort Ross, Shelley
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Competency-based medical education is now established in health professions training. However, critics stress that there is a lack of published outcomes for competency-based medical education or competency-based assessment tools. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether competency-based assessment is associated with better identification of and support for residents in difficulty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study of secondary data from archived files on 458 family medicine residents (2006-2008 and 2010-2016) was conducted between July 5, 2016, and March 2, 2018, using a large, urban family medicine residency program in Canada. EXPOSURES: Introduction of the Competency-Based Achievement System (CBAS). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of residents (1) with at least 1 performance or professionalism flag, (2) receiving flags on multiple distinct rotations, (3) classified as in difficulty, and (4) with flags addressed by the residency program. RESULTS: Files from 458 residents were reviewed (pre-CBAS: n = 163; 81 [49.7%] women; 90 [55.2%] aged >30 years; 105 [64.4%] Canadian medical graduates; post-CBAS: n = 295; 144 [48.8%] women; 128 [43.4%] aged >30 years; 243 [82.4%] Canadian medical graduates). A significant reduction in the proportion of residents receiving at least 1 flag during training after CBAS implementation was observed (0.38; 95% CI, 0.377-0.383), as well as a significant decrease in the numbers of distinct rotations during which residents received flags on summative assessments (0.24; 95% CI, 0.237-0.243). There was a decrease in the number of residents in difficulty after CBAS (from 0.13 [95% CI, 0.128-0.132] to 0.17 [95% CI, 0.168-0.172]) depending on the strictness of criteria defining a resident in difficulty. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in narrative documentation that a flag was discussed with the resident between the pre-CBAS and post-CBAS conditions (0.18; 95% CI, 0.178-0.183). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CBAS approach to assessment appeared to be associated with better identification of residents in difficulty, facilitating the program’s ability to address learners’ deficiencies in competence. After implementation of CBAS, residents experiencing challenges were better supported and their deficiencies did not recur on later rotations. A key argument for shifting to competency-based medical education is to change assessment approaches; these findings suggest that competency-based assessment may be useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6324593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63245932019-01-22 Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty Ross, Shelley Binczyk, Natalia M. Hamza, Deena M. Schipper, Shirley Humphries, Paul Nichols, Darren Donoff, Michel G. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Competency-based medical education is now established in health professions training. However, critics stress that there is a lack of published outcomes for competency-based medical education or competency-based assessment tools. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether competency-based assessment is associated with better identification of and support for residents in difficulty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study of secondary data from archived files on 458 family medicine residents (2006-2008 and 2010-2016) was conducted between July 5, 2016, and March 2, 2018, using a large, urban family medicine residency program in Canada. EXPOSURES: Introduction of the Competency-Based Achievement System (CBAS). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of residents (1) with at least 1 performance or professionalism flag, (2) receiving flags on multiple distinct rotations, (3) classified as in difficulty, and (4) with flags addressed by the residency program. RESULTS: Files from 458 residents were reviewed (pre-CBAS: n = 163; 81 [49.7%] women; 90 [55.2%] aged >30 years; 105 [64.4%] Canadian medical graduates; post-CBAS: n = 295; 144 [48.8%] women; 128 [43.4%] aged >30 years; 243 [82.4%] Canadian medical graduates). A significant reduction in the proportion of residents receiving at least 1 flag during training after CBAS implementation was observed (0.38; 95% CI, 0.377-0.383), as well as a significant decrease in the numbers of distinct rotations during which residents received flags on summative assessments (0.24; 95% CI, 0.237-0.243). There was a decrease in the number of residents in difficulty after CBAS (from 0.13 [95% CI, 0.128-0.132] to 0.17 [95% CI, 0.168-0.172]) depending on the strictness of criteria defining a resident in difficulty. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in narrative documentation that a flag was discussed with the resident between the pre-CBAS and post-CBAS conditions (0.18; 95% CI, 0.178-0.183). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CBAS approach to assessment appeared to be associated with better identification of residents in difficulty, facilitating the program’s ability to address learners’ deficiencies in competence. After implementation of CBAS, residents experiencing challenges were better supported and their deficiencies did not recur on later rotations. A key argument for shifting to competency-based medical education is to change assessment approaches; these findings suggest that competency-based assessment may be useful. American Medical Association 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6324593/ /pubmed/30646360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4581 Text en Copyright 2018 Ross S et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Ross, Shelley
Binczyk, Natalia M.
Hamza, Deena M.
Schipper, Shirley
Humphries, Paul
Nichols, Darren
Donoff, Michel G.
Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty
title Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty
title_full Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty
title_fullStr Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty
title_full_unstemmed Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty
title_short Association of a Competency-Based Assessment System With Identification of and Support for Medical Residents in Difficulty
title_sort association of a competency-based assessment system with identification of and support for medical residents in difficulty
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30646360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4581
work_keys_str_mv AT rossshelley associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty
AT binczyknataliam associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty
AT hamzadeenam associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty
AT schippershirley associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty
AT humphriespaul associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty
AT nicholsdarren associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty
AT donoffmichelg associationofacompetencybasedassessmentsystemwithidentificationofandsupportformedicalresidentsindifficulty