Cargando…

Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Xerostomia is a subjective measure of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is an objective measure of reduced saliva flow rate. In this study, we aim to assess the association between commonly used xerostomia scoring systems, with different hyposalivation measures among Sjogren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hijjaw, Ola, Alawneh, Mohammad, Ojjoh, Khaled, Abuasbeh, Hazem, Alkilany, Ahmad, Qasem, Nabeel, Al-Essa, Mohammad, AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S188937
_version_ 1783386004967653376
author Hijjaw, Ola
Alawneh, Mohammad
Ojjoh, Khaled
Abuasbeh, Hazem
Alkilany, Ahmad
Qasem, Nabeel
Al-Essa, Mohammad
AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
author_facet Hijjaw, Ola
Alawneh, Mohammad
Ojjoh, Khaled
Abuasbeh, Hazem
Alkilany, Ahmad
Qasem, Nabeel
Al-Essa, Mohammad
AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
author_sort Hijjaw, Ola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Xerostomia is a subjective measure of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is an objective measure of reduced saliva flow rate. In this study, we aim to assess the association between commonly used xerostomia scoring systems, with different hyposalivation measures among Sjogren Syndrome (SS) patients. METHODS: In a cohort of SS patients, we assessed xerostomia using Xerostomia index, clinical oral dryness scale (CODS), and the European League Against Rheumatism SS Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI), and we assessed hyposalivation using unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), stimulated whole saliva flow (SWS), and stimulated parotid flow (SPF). We analyzed the association between xerostomia and hyposalivation using association tests in SPSS. RESULTS: We included a total of 49 patients in this study, of which 34 (68%) had primary SS, and 15 (32%) had secondary. CODS was significantly correlated with SWS (P=0.048), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.216, and with SPF (P=0.009), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.291. The dryness domain of ESSPRI was significantly correlated with UWS (P=0.031) with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.233. CONCLUSION: CODS is the scoring system with the highest correlation with hyposalivation, particularly SWS and SPF, followed by ESSPRI dry domain, which is correlated with UWS. Xerostomia index is not correlated with hyposalivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6324613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63246132019-01-17 Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests Hijjaw, Ola Alawneh, Mohammad Ojjoh, Khaled Abuasbeh, Hazem Alkilany, Ahmad Qasem, Nabeel Al-Essa, Mohammad AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen Open Access Rheumatol Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Xerostomia is a subjective measure of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is an objective measure of reduced saliva flow rate. In this study, we aim to assess the association between commonly used xerostomia scoring systems, with different hyposalivation measures among Sjogren Syndrome (SS) patients. METHODS: In a cohort of SS patients, we assessed xerostomia using Xerostomia index, clinical oral dryness scale (CODS), and the European League Against Rheumatism SS Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI), and we assessed hyposalivation using unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), stimulated whole saliva flow (SWS), and stimulated parotid flow (SPF). We analyzed the association between xerostomia and hyposalivation using association tests in SPSS. RESULTS: We included a total of 49 patients in this study, of which 34 (68%) had primary SS, and 15 (32%) had secondary. CODS was significantly correlated with SWS (P=0.048), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.216, and with SPF (P=0.009), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.291. The dryness domain of ESSPRI was significantly correlated with UWS (P=0.031) with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.233. CONCLUSION: CODS is the scoring system with the highest correlation with hyposalivation, particularly SWS and SPF, followed by ESSPRI dry domain, which is correlated with UWS. Xerostomia index is not correlated with hyposalivation. Dove Medical Press 2019-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6324613/ /pubmed/30655709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S188937 Text en © 2019 Hijjaw et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hijjaw, Ola
Alawneh, Mohammad
Ojjoh, Khaled
Abuasbeh, Hazem
Alkilany, Ahmad
Qasem, Nabeel
Al-Essa, Mohammad
AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
title Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
title_full Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
title_fullStr Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
title_short Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
title_sort correlation between xerostomia index, clinical oral dryness scale, and esspri with different hyposalivation tests
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655709
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S188937
work_keys_str_mv AT hijjawola correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT alawnehmohammad correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT ojjohkhaled correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT abuasbehhazem correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT alkilanyahmad correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT qasemnabeel correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT alessamohammad correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests
AT alryalatsaifaldeen correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests