Cargando…
Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Xerostomia is a subjective measure of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is an objective measure of reduced saliva flow rate. In this study, we aim to assess the association between commonly used xerostomia scoring systems, with different hyposalivation measures among Sjogren...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S188937 |
_version_ | 1783386004967653376 |
---|---|
author | Hijjaw, Ola Alawneh, Mohammad Ojjoh, Khaled Abuasbeh, Hazem Alkilany, Ahmad Qasem, Nabeel Al-Essa, Mohammad AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen |
author_facet | Hijjaw, Ola Alawneh, Mohammad Ojjoh, Khaled Abuasbeh, Hazem Alkilany, Ahmad Qasem, Nabeel Al-Essa, Mohammad AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen |
author_sort | Hijjaw, Ola |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Xerostomia is a subjective measure of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is an objective measure of reduced saliva flow rate. In this study, we aim to assess the association between commonly used xerostomia scoring systems, with different hyposalivation measures among Sjogren Syndrome (SS) patients. METHODS: In a cohort of SS patients, we assessed xerostomia using Xerostomia index, clinical oral dryness scale (CODS), and the European League Against Rheumatism SS Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI), and we assessed hyposalivation using unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), stimulated whole saliva flow (SWS), and stimulated parotid flow (SPF). We analyzed the association between xerostomia and hyposalivation using association tests in SPSS. RESULTS: We included a total of 49 patients in this study, of which 34 (68%) had primary SS, and 15 (32%) had secondary. CODS was significantly correlated with SWS (P=0.048), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.216, and with SPF (P=0.009), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.291. The dryness domain of ESSPRI was significantly correlated with UWS (P=0.031) with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.233. CONCLUSION: CODS is the scoring system with the highest correlation with hyposalivation, particularly SWS and SPF, followed by ESSPRI dry domain, which is correlated with UWS. Xerostomia index is not correlated with hyposalivation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6324613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63246132019-01-17 Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests Hijjaw, Ola Alawneh, Mohammad Ojjoh, Khaled Abuasbeh, Hazem Alkilany, Ahmad Qasem, Nabeel Al-Essa, Mohammad AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen Open Access Rheumatol Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Xerostomia is a subjective measure of dry mouth, while hyposalivation is an objective measure of reduced saliva flow rate. In this study, we aim to assess the association between commonly used xerostomia scoring systems, with different hyposalivation measures among Sjogren Syndrome (SS) patients. METHODS: In a cohort of SS patients, we assessed xerostomia using Xerostomia index, clinical oral dryness scale (CODS), and the European League Against Rheumatism SS Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI), and we assessed hyposalivation using unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), stimulated whole saliva flow (SWS), and stimulated parotid flow (SPF). We analyzed the association between xerostomia and hyposalivation using association tests in SPSS. RESULTS: We included a total of 49 patients in this study, of which 34 (68%) had primary SS, and 15 (32%) had secondary. CODS was significantly correlated with SWS (P=0.048), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.216, and with SPF (P=0.009), with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.291. The dryness domain of ESSPRI was significantly correlated with UWS (P=0.031) with a negative correlation coefficient of 0.233. CONCLUSION: CODS is the scoring system with the highest correlation with hyposalivation, particularly SWS and SPF, followed by ESSPRI dry domain, which is correlated with UWS. Xerostomia index is not correlated with hyposalivation. Dove Medical Press 2019-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6324613/ /pubmed/30655709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S188937 Text en © 2019 Hijjaw et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hijjaw, Ola Alawneh, Mohammad Ojjoh, Khaled Abuasbeh, Hazem Alkilany, Ahmad Qasem, Nabeel Al-Essa, Mohammad AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests |
title | Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests |
title_full | Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests |
title_fullStr | Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests |
title_short | Correlation between Xerostomia index, Clinical Oral Dryness Scale, and ESSPRI with different hyposalivation tests |
title_sort | correlation between xerostomia index, clinical oral dryness scale, and esspri with different hyposalivation tests |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655709 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S188937 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hijjawola correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT alawnehmohammad correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT ojjohkhaled correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT abuasbehhazem correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT alkilanyahmad correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT qasemnabeel correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT alessamohammad correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests AT alryalatsaifaldeen correlationbetweenxerostomiaindexclinicaloraldrynessscaleandesspriwithdifferenthyposalivationtests |