Cargando…

Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt

INTRODUCTION: The Association of American Medical Colleges has introduced the Standardized Video Interview (SVI) to assess the communication and professionalism skills of residency applicants to allow a more holistic view of applicants beyond academic performance. Initial data suggests scores are no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnapp, Benjamin H., Ritter, Daniel, Kraut, Aaron S., Fallon, Sarah, Westergaard, Mary C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30643616
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.10.39709
_version_ 1783386023133184000
author Schnapp, Benjamin H.
Ritter, Daniel
Kraut, Aaron S.
Fallon, Sarah
Westergaard, Mary C.
author_facet Schnapp, Benjamin H.
Ritter, Daniel
Kraut, Aaron S.
Fallon, Sarah
Westergaard, Mary C.
author_sort Schnapp, Benjamin H.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Association of American Medical Colleges has introduced the Standardized Video Interview (SVI) to assess the communication and professionalism skills of residency applicants to allow a more holistic view of applicants beyond academic performance. Initial data suggests scores are not correlated with academic performance and provide a new measure of applicant attributes. It is not currently known how the SVI compares to existing metrics for assessing communication and professionalism during the interview process. METHODS: Applicants to the University of Wisconsin Emergency Medicine Residency program were invited and interviewed without use of the SVI scores or videos. All faculty interviewers were blinded to applicants’ SVI information and asked to rate each applicant on their communication and professionalism on a scale from 1–25 (faculty gestalt score), analogous to the 6–30 scoring used by the SVI. We transformed SVI scores to our 1–25 system (transformed SVI score) for ease of comparison and compared them to faculty gestalt scores as well as applicants’ overall score for all components of their interview day (interview score). RESULTS: We collected data for 125 residency candidates. Each applicant received a faculty gestalt score from up to four faculty interviewers. There was no significant correlation of SVI scores with faculty gestalt scores (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient [r(s)] (123)=0.09, p=0.30) and no correlation with the overall interview score (r(s)(123)=0.01, p=0.93). Faculty gestalt scores were correlated positively with interview scores (r(s)(123)=0.65, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: SVI scores show no significant correlation with faculty gestalt scores of communication and professionalism. This could relate to bias introduced by knowledge of an applicant’s academic performance, different types of questions being asked by faculty interviewers, or lack of uniform criteria by which faculty assess these competencies. Further research is needed to determine whether SVI scores or faculty gestalt correlate with performance during residency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6324715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63247152019-01-14 Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt Schnapp, Benjamin H. Ritter, Daniel Kraut, Aaron S. Fallon, Sarah Westergaard, Mary C. West J Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Association of American Medical Colleges has introduced the Standardized Video Interview (SVI) to assess the communication and professionalism skills of residency applicants to allow a more holistic view of applicants beyond academic performance. Initial data suggests scores are not correlated with academic performance and provide a new measure of applicant attributes. It is not currently known how the SVI compares to existing metrics for assessing communication and professionalism during the interview process. METHODS: Applicants to the University of Wisconsin Emergency Medicine Residency program were invited and interviewed without use of the SVI scores or videos. All faculty interviewers were blinded to applicants’ SVI information and asked to rate each applicant on their communication and professionalism on a scale from 1–25 (faculty gestalt score), analogous to the 6–30 scoring used by the SVI. We transformed SVI scores to our 1–25 system (transformed SVI score) for ease of comparison and compared them to faculty gestalt scores as well as applicants’ overall score for all components of their interview day (interview score). RESULTS: We collected data for 125 residency candidates. Each applicant received a faculty gestalt score from up to four faculty interviewers. There was no significant correlation of SVI scores with faculty gestalt scores (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient [r(s)] (123)=0.09, p=0.30) and no correlation with the overall interview score (r(s)(123)=0.01, p=0.93). Faculty gestalt scores were correlated positively with interview scores (r(s)(123)=0.65, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: SVI scores show no significant correlation with faculty gestalt scores of communication and professionalism. This could relate to bias introduced by knowledge of an applicant’s academic performance, different types of questions being asked by faculty interviewers, or lack of uniform criteria by which faculty assess these competencies. Further research is needed to determine whether SVI scores or faculty gestalt correlate with performance during residency. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-01 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6324715/ /pubmed/30643616 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.10.39709 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Schnapp et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Schnapp, Benjamin H.
Ritter, Daniel
Kraut, Aaron S.
Fallon, Sarah
Westergaard, Mary C.
Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
title Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
title_full Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
title_fullStr Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
title_short Assessing Residency Applicants’ Communication and Professionalism: Standardized Video Interview Scores Compared to Faculty Gestalt
title_sort assessing residency applicants’ communication and professionalism: standardized video interview scores compared to faculty gestalt
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30643616
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.10.39709
work_keys_str_mv AT schnappbenjaminh assessingresidencyapplicantscommunicationandprofessionalismstandardizedvideointerviewscorescomparedtofacultygestalt
AT ritterdaniel assessingresidencyapplicantscommunicationandprofessionalismstandardizedvideointerviewscorescomparedtofacultygestalt
AT krautaarons assessingresidencyapplicantscommunicationandprofessionalismstandardizedvideointerviewscorescomparedtofacultygestalt
AT fallonsarah assessingresidencyapplicantscommunicationandprofessionalismstandardizedvideointerviewscorescomparedtofacultygestalt
AT westergaardmaryc assessingresidencyapplicantscommunicationandprofessionalismstandardizedvideointerviewscorescomparedtofacultygestalt