Cargando…

Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate

BACKGROUND: Orbital resorbable mesh plates are adequate to use for isolated floor and medial wall fractures with an intact bony buttress, but are not recommended to use for large orbital wall fractures that need load bearing support. The author previously reported an orbital wall restoring surgery t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joo, Jae Doo, Kang, Dong Hee, Kim, Hyon Surk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30332891
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.01956
_version_ 1783386108714811392
author Joo, Jae Doo
Kang, Dong Hee
Kim, Hyon Surk
author_facet Joo, Jae Doo
Kang, Dong Hee
Kim, Hyon Surk
author_sort Joo, Jae Doo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orbital resorbable mesh plates are adequate to use for isolated floor and medial wall fractures with an intact bony buttress, but are not recommended to use for large orbital wall fractures that need load bearing support. The author previously reported an orbital wall restoring surgery that restored the orbital floor to its prior position through the transnasal approach and maintained temporary extraorbital support with a balloon in the maxillary sinus. Extraorbital support could reduce the load applied on the orbital implants in orbital wall restoring surgery and the use of resorbable implants was considered appropriate for the author’s orbital wall restoring technique. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 31 patients with pure unilateral orbital floor fractures between May 2014 and May 2018. The patients underwent transnasal restoration of the orbital floor through insertion of a resorbable mesh plate and maintenance of temporary balloon support. The surgical results were evaluated by the Hertel scale and a comparison of preoperative and postoperative orbital volume ratio (OVR) values. RESULTS: The OVR decreased significantly, by an average of 6.01% (p< 0.05) and the preoperative and postoperative Hertel scale measurements decreased by an average of 0.34 mm with statistical significance (p< 0.05). No complications such as buckling or sagging of the implant occurred among the 31 patients. CONCLUSION: The use of resorbable mesh plate in orbital floor restoration surgery is an effective and safe technique that can reduce implant deformation or complications deriving from the residual permanent implant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6325327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63253272019-01-11 Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate Joo, Jae Doo Kang, Dong Hee Kim, Hyon Surk Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Orbital resorbable mesh plates are adequate to use for isolated floor and medial wall fractures with an intact bony buttress, but are not recommended to use for large orbital wall fractures that need load bearing support. The author previously reported an orbital wall restoring surgery that restored the orbital floor to its prior position through the transnasal approach and maintained temporary extraorbital support with a balloon in the maxillary sinus. Extraorbital support could reduce the load applied on the orbital implants in orbital wall restoring surgery and the use of resorbable implants was considered appropriate for the author’s orbital wall restoring technique. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 31 patients with pure unilateral orbital floor fractures between May 2014 and May 2018. The patients underwent transnasal restoration of the orbital floor through insertion of a resorbable mesh plate and maintenance of temporary balloon support. The surgical results were evaluated by the Hertel scale and a comparison of preoperative and postoperative orbital volume ratio (OVR) values. RESULTS: The OVR decreased significantly, by an average of 6.01% (p< 0.05) and the preoperative and postoperative Hertel scale measurements decreased by an average of 0.34 mm with statistical significance (p< 0.05). No complications such as buckling or sagging of the implant occurred among the 31 patients. CONCLUSION: The use of resorbable mesh plate in orbital floor restoration surgery is an effective and safe technique that can reduce implant deformation or complications deriving from the residual permanent implant. Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2018-12 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6325327/ /pubmed/30332891 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.01956 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joo, Jae Doo
Kang, Dong Hee
Kim, Hyon Surk
Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
title Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
title_full Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
title_fullStr Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
title_full_unstemmed Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
title_short Orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
title_sort orbital wall restoring surgery with resorbable mesh plate
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30332891
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.01956
work_keys_str_mv AT joojaedoo orbitalwallrestoringsurgerywithresorbablemeshplate
AT kangdonghee orbitalwallrestoringsurgerywithresorbablemeshplate
AT kimhyonsurk orbitalwallrestoringsurgerywithresorbablemeshplate