Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapuente-Ocamica, O., Ugarte, L., Lopez-Picado, A., Sanchez-Refoyo, F., Lasa, Iñaki Lete, Echevarria, O., Álvarez-Sala, J., Fariñas, A., Bilbao, I., Barbero, L., Vicarregui, J., Hernanz Chaves, R., Paz Corral, D., Lopez-Lopez, J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3
_version_ 1783386179880615936
author Lapuente-Ocamica, O.
Ugarte, L.
Lopez-Picado, A.
Sanchez-Refoyo, F.
Lasa, Iñaki Lete
Echevarria, O.
Álvarez-Sala, J.
Fariñas, A.
Bilbao, I.
Barbero, L.
Vicarregui, J.
Hernanz Chaves, R.
Paz Corral, D.
Lopez-Lopez, J. A.
author_facet Lapuente-Ocamica, O.
Ugarte, L.
Lopez-Picado, A.
Sanchez-Refoyo, F.
Lasa, Iñaki Lete
Echevarria, O.
Álvarez-Sala, J.
Fariñas, A.
Bilbao, I.
Barbero, L.
Vicarregui, J.
Hernanz Chaves, R.
Paz Corral, D.
Lopez-Lopez, J. A.
author_sort Lapuente-Ocamica, O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indicating that the use of an escalating dose of an oral misoprostol solution is associated with a lower rate of caesarean sections and a better safety profile. The objective of this study is to assess which of these three therapeutic options (oral or vaginal misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone) achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery within the first 24 h of drug administration. METHODS: An open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Araba University Hospital (Spain). Women at ≥41 weeks of pregnancy requiring elective induction of labour who meet the selection criteria will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: 1) vaginal dinoprostone (delivered via a controlled-release vaginal insert containing 10 mg of dinoprostone, for up to 24 h); 2) vaginal misoprostol (25 μg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 h up to a maximum of 24 h); and 3) oral misoprostol (titrated doses of 20 to 60 μg of misoprostol following a 3 h on + 1 h off regimen up to a maximum of 24 h). Both intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: The proposed study seeks to gather evidence on which of these three therapeutic options achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery with the best safety profile, to enable obstetricians to use the most effective and safe option for their patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02902653 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02902653 (7th September 2016). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6325751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63257512019-01-11 Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial Lapuente-Ocamica, O. Ugarte, L. Lopez-Picado, A. Sanchez-Refoyo, F. Lasa, Iñaki Lete Echevarria, O. Álvarez-Sala, J. Fariñas, A. Bilbao, I. Barbero, L. Vicarregui, J. Hernanz Chaves, R. Paz Corral, D. Lopez-Lopez, J. A. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indicating that the use of an escalating dose of an oral misoprostol solution is associated with a lower rate of caesarean sections and a better safety profile. The objective of this study is to assess which of these three therapeutic options (oral or vaginal misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone) achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery within the first 24 h of drug administration. METHODS: An open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Araba University Hospital (Spain). Women at ≥41 weeks of pregnancy requiring elective induction of labour who meet the selection criteria will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: 1) vaginal dinoprostone (delivered via a controlled-release vaginal insert containing 10 mg of dinoprostone, for up to 24 h); 2) vaginal misoprostol (25 μg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 h up to a maximum of 24 h); and 3) oral misoprostol (titrated doses of 20 to 60 μg of misoprostol following a 3 h on + 1 h off regimen up to a maximum of 24 h). Both intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: The proposed study seeks to gather evidence on which of these three therapeutic options achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery with the best safety profile, to enable obstetricians to use the most effective and safe option for their patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02902653 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02902653 (7th September 2016). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6325751/ /pubmed/30621614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lapuente-Ocamica, O.
Ugarte, L.
Lopez-Picado, A.
Sanchez-Refoyo, F.
Lasa, Iñaki Lete
Echevarria, O.
Álvarez-Sala, J.
Fariñas, A.
Bilbao, I.
Barbero, L.
Vicarregui, J.
Hernanz Chaves, R.
Paz Corral, D.
Lopez-Lopez, J. A.
Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lapuenteocamicao efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT ugartel efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT lopezpicadoa efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sanchezrefoyof efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT lasainakilete efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT echevarriao efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT alvarezsalaj efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT farinasa efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT bilbaoi efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT barberol efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vicarreguij efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT hernanzchavesr efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT pazcorrald efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT lopezlopezja efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial