Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3 |
_version_ | 1783386179880615936 |
---|---|
author | Lapuente-Ocamica, O. Ugarte, L. Lopez-Picado, A. Sanchez-Refoyo, F. Lasa, Iñaki Lete Echevarria, O. Álvarez-Sala, J. Fariñas, A. Bilbao, I. Barbero, L. Vicarregui, J. Hernanz Chaves, R. Paz Corral, D. Lopez-Lopez, J. A. |
author_facet | Lapuente-Ocamica, O. Ugarte, L. Lopez-Picado, A. Sanchez-Refoyo, F. Lasa, Iñaki Lete Echevarria, O. Álvarez-Sala, J. Fariñas, A. Bilbao, I. Barbero, L. Vicarregui, J. Hernanz Chaves, R. Paz Corral, D. Lopez-Lopez, J. A. |
author_sort | Lapuente-Ocamica, O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indicating that the use of an escalating dose of an oral misoprostol solution is associated with a lower rate of caesarean sections and a better safety profile. The objective of this study is to assess which of these three therapeutic options (oral or vaginal misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone) achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery within the first 24 h of drug administration. METHODS: An open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Araba University Hospital (Spain). Women at ≥41 weeks of pregnancy requiring elective induction of labour who meet the selection criteria will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: 1) vaginal dinoprostone (delivered via a controlled-release vaginal insert containing 10 mg of dinoprostone, for up to 24 h); 2) vaginal misoprostol (25 μg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 h up to a maximum of 24 h); and 3) oral misoprostol (titrated doses of 20 to 60 μg of misoprostol following a 3 h on + 1 h off regimen up to a maximum of 24 h). Both intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: The proposed study seeks to gather evidence on which of these three therapeutic options achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery with the best safety profile, to enable obstetricians to use the most effective and safe option for their patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02902653 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02902653 (7th September 2016). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6325751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63257512019-01-11 Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial Lapuente-Ocamica, O. Ugarte, L. Lopez-Picado, A. Sanchez-Refoyo, F. Lasa, Iñaki Lete Echevarria, O. Álvarez-Sala, J. Fariñas, A. Bilbao, I. Barbero, L. Vicarregui, J. Hernanz Chaves, R. Paz Corral, D. Lopez-Lopez, J. A. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Among the various methods available, the administration of prostaglandins is the most effective for inducing labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. Recent studies have compared treatment with various titrated doses of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol or dinoprostone, indicating that the use of an escalating dose of an oral misoprostol solution is associated with a lower rate of caesarean sections and a better safety profile. The objective of this study is to assess which of these three therapeutic options (oral or vaginal misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone) achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery within the first 24 h of drug administration. METHODS: An open-label randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Araba University Hospital (Spain). Women at ≥41 weeks of pregnancy requiring elective induction of labour who meet the selection criteria will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: 1) vaginal dinoprostone (delivered via a controlled-release vaginal insert containing 10 mg of dinoprostone, for up to 24 h); 2) vaginal misoprostol (25 μg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 h up to a maximum of 24 h); and 3) oral misoprostol (titrated doses of 20 to 60 μg of misoprostol following a 3 h on + 1 h off regimen up to a maximum of 24 h). Both intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: The proposed study seeks to gather evidence on which of these three therapeutic options achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery with the best safety profile, to enable obstetricians to use the most effective and safe option for their patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02902653 Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02902653 (7th September 2016). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6325751/ /pubmed/30621614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lapuente-Ocamica, O. Ugarte, L. Lopez-Picado, A. Sanchez-Refoyo, F. Lasa, Iñaki Lete Echevarria, O. Álvarez-Sala, J. Fariñas, A. Bilbao, I. Barbero, L. Vicarregui, J. Hernanz Chaves, R. Paz Corral, D. Lopez-Lopez, J. A. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2132-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lapuenteocamicao efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT ugartel efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT lopezpicadoa efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT sanchezrefoyof efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT lasainakilete efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT echevarriao efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT alvarezsalaj efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT farinasa efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT bilbaoi efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT barberol efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT vicarreguij efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT hernanzchavesr efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT pazcorrald efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial AT lopezlopezja efficacyandsafetyofadministeringoralmisoprostolbytitrationcomparedtovaginalmisoprostolanddinoprostoneforcervicalripeningandinductionoflabourstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrial |