Cargando…

Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified lung, sputum or blood transcriptomic biomarkers associated with the severity of airflow limitation in COPD. Yet, it is not clear whether the lung pathobiology is mirrored by these surrogate tissues. The aim of this study was to explore this question. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faner, Rosa, Morrow, Jarrett D., Casas-Recasens, Sandra, Cloonan, Suzanne M., Noell, Guillaume, López-Giraldo, Alejandra, Tal-Singer, Ruth, Miller, Bruce E., Silverman, Edwin K., Agustí, Alvar, Hersh, Craig P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0965-y
_version_ 1783386187912708096
author Faner, Rosa
Morrow, Jarrett D.
Casas-Recasens, Sandra
Cloonan, Suzanne M.
Noell, Guillaume
López-Giraldo, Alejandra
Tal-Singer, Ruth
Miller, Bruce E.
Silverman, Edwin K.
Agustí, Alvar
Hersh, Craig P.
author_facet Faner, Rosa
Morrow, Jarrett D.
Casas-Recasens, Sandra
Cloonan, Suzanne M.
Noell, Guillaume
López-Giraldo, Alejandra
Tal-Singer, Ruth
Miller, Bruce E.
Silverman, Edwin K.
Agustí, Alvar
Hersh, Craig P.
author_sort Faner, Rosa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified lung, sputum or blood transcriptomic biomarkers associated with the severity of airflow limitation in COPD. Yet, it is not clear whether the lung pathobiology is mirrored by these surrogate tissues. The aim of this study was to explore this question. METHODS: We used Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to identify shared pathological mechanisms across four COPD gene-expression datasets: two sets of lung tissues (L1 n = 70; L2 n = 124), and one each of induced sputum (S; n = 121) and peripheral blood (B; n = 121). RESULTS: WGCNA analysis identified twenty-one gene co-expression modules in L1. A robust module preservation between the two L datasets was observed (86%), with less preservation in S (33%) and even less in B (23%). Three modules preserved across lung tissues and sputum (not blood) were associated with the severity of airflow limitation. Ontology enrichment analysis showed that these modules included genes related to mitochondrial function, ion-homeostasis, T cells and RNA processing. These findings were largely reproduced using the consensus WGCNA network approach. CONCLUSIONS: These observations indicate that major differences in lung tissue transcriptomics in patients with COPD are poorly mirrored in sputum and are unrelated to those determined in blood, suggesting that the systemic component in COPD is independently regulated. Finally, the fact that one of the preserved modules associated with FEV1 was enriched in mitochondria-related genes supports a role for mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathobiology of COPD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0965-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6325784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63257842019-01-11 Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis Faner, Rosa Morrow, Jarrett D. Casas-Recasens, Sandra Cloonan, Suzanne M. Noell, Guillaume López-Giraldo, Alejandra Tal-Singer, Ruth Miller, Bruce E. Silverman, Edwin K. Agustí, Alvar Hersh, Craig P. Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified lung, sputum or blood transcriptomic biomarkers associated with the severity of airflow limitation in COPD. Yet, it is not clear whether the lung pathobiology is mirrored by these surrogate tissues. The aim of this study was to explore this question. METHODS: We used Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to identify shared pathological mechanisms across four COPD gene-expression datasets: two sets of lung tissues (L1 n = 70; L2 n = 124), and one each of induced sputum (S; n = 121) and peripheral blood (B; n = 121). RESULTS: WGCNA analysis identified twenty-one gene co-expression modules in L1. A robust module preservation between the two L datasets was observed (86%), with less preservation in S (33%) and even less in B (23%). Three modules preserved across lung tissues and sputum (not blood) were associated with the severity of airflow limitation. Ontology enrichment analysis showed that these modules included genes related to mitochondrial function, ion-homeostasis, T cells and RNA processing. These findings were largely reproduced using the consensus WGCNA network approach. CONCLUSIONS: These observations indicate that major differences in lung tissue transcriptomics in patients with COPD are poorly mirrored in sputum and are unrelated to those determined in blood, suggesting that the systemic component in COPD is independently regulated. Finally, the fact that one of the preserved modules associated with FEV1 was enriched in mitochondria-related genes supports a role for mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathobiology of COPD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0965-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-08 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6325784/ /pubmed/30621695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0965-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Faner, Rosa
Morrow, Jarrett D.
Casas-Recasens, Sandra
Cloonan, Suzanne M.
Noell, Guillaume
López-Giraldo, Alejandra
Tal-Singer, Ruth
Miller, Bruce E.
Silverman, Edwin K.
Agustí, Alvar
Hersh, Craig P.
Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis
title Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis
title_full Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis
title_fullStr Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis
title_short Do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of COPD patients? A multi-tissue transcriptomic network META-analysis
title_sort do sputum or circulating blood samples reflect the pulmonary transcriptomic differences of copd patients? a multi-tissue transcriptomic network meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0965-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fanerrosa dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT morrowjarrettd dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT casasrecasenssandra dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT cloonansuzannem dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT noellguillaume dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lopezgiraldoalejandra dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT talsingerruth dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT millerbrucee dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT silvermanedwink dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT agustialvar dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hershcraigp dosputumorcirculatingbloodsamplesreflectthepulmonarytranscriptomicdifferencesofcopdpatientsamultitissuetranscriptomicnetworkmetaanalysis