Cargando…
Judging residents’ performance: a qualitative study using grounded theory
BACKGROUND: Although program directors judge residents’ performance for summative decisions, little is known about how they do this. This study examined what information program directors use and how they value this information in making a judgment of residents’ performance and what residents think...
Autores principales: | Duitsman, Marrigje E., Fluit, Cornelia R. M. G., van der Goot, Wieke E., ten Kate-Booij, Marianne, de Graaf, Jacqueline, Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6325830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30621674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1446-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Using conversation analysis to explore feedback on resident performance
por: Duitsman, Marrigje E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
por: Duitsman, Marrigje E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Trainee‐environment interactions that stimulate motivation: A rich pictures study
por: van der Goot, Wieke E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
From aggregation to interpretation: how assessors judge complex data in a competency-based portfolio
por: Oudkerk Pool, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Unraveling the medical residency selection game
por: Gennissen, Lokke M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)