Cargando…

Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish the first global health bachelor curriculum in China. DESIGN: The Delphi methodology was used to determine expert consensus on which courses should be included in the global health bachelor curriculum. A literature review and a workshop proceeding were perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guan, Li, Gao, Pan, Liu, SuYang, Liu, YiSi, Li, XiangYu, Liu, FeiFei, Mao, ZongFu, Lu, YuanAn, Xiang, Hao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30610023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023893
_version_ 1783386273565638656
author Guan, Li
Gao, Pan
Liu, SuYang
Liu, YiSi
Li, XiangYu
Liu, FeiFei
Mao, ZongFu
Lu, YuanAn
Xiang, Hao
author_facet Guan, Li
Gao, Pan
Liu, SuYang
Liu, YiSi
Li, XiangYu
Liu, FeiFei
Mao, ZongFu
Lu, YuanAn
Xiang, Hao
author_sort Guan, Li
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish the first global health bachelor curriculum in China. DESIGN: The Delphi methodology was used to determine expert consensus on which courses should be included in the global health bachelor curriculum. A literature review and a workshop proceeding were performed to generate courses. Then a two-round Delphi process was conducted with 28 invited experts from universities, health administrative departments and non-governmental organisations to rate courses using a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, the experts could alter, add or delete courses as appropriate. Consensus was predefined as a mean score of 4 or above and the percent agreement (proportion of panel members scoring ‘very important’ or ‘important’) no less than 75%. RESULTS: The responses in the two-round Delphi process were 85.7% and 70.8%, respectively. In the first round, 12 courses did not meet the inclusion criteria and were removed. Based on the participants’ comments, 32 courses were included in round 2. In the second round, the consensus was reached on 31 courses which were selected as the final curriculum. These courses were categorised into five modules, including General Knowledge, Methodology, Global Health Issues, Intercultural Communication, and Health Policy and Programme Management. CONCLUSION: This study established the first global health bachelor curriculum in China. It will provide guidance for other educational institutions to develop similar programmes or curricula in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6326272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63262722019-01-25 Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study Guan, Li Gao, Pan Liu, SuYang Liu, YiSi Li, XiangYu Liu, FeiFei Mao, ZongFu Lu, YuanAn Xiang, Hao BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish the first global health bachelor curriculum in China. DESIGN: The Delphi methodology was used to determine expert consensus on which courses should be included in the global health bachelor curriculum. A literature review and a workshop proceeding were performed to generate courses. Then a two-round Delphi process was conducted with 28 invited experts from universities, health administrative departments and non-governmental organisations to rate courses using a 5-point Likert scale. Additionally, the experts could alter, add or delete courses as appropriate. Consensus was predefined as a mean score of 4 or above and the percent agreement (proportion of panel members scoring ‘very important’ or ‘important’) no less than 75%. RESULTS: The responses in the two-round Delphi process were 85.7% and 70.8%, respectively. In the first round, 12 courses did not meet the inclusion criteria and were removed. Based on the participants’ comments, 32 courses were included in round 2. In the second round, the consensus was reached on 31 courses which were selected as the final curriculum. These courses were categorised into five modules, including General Knowledge, Methodology, Global Health Issues, Intercultural Communication, and Health Policy and Programme Management. CONCLUSION: This study established the first global health bachelor curriculum in China. It will provide guidance for other educational institutions to develop similar programmes or curricula in the future. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6326272/ /pubmed/30610023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023893 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Guan, Li
Gao, Pan
Liu, SuYang
Liu, YiSi
Li, XiangYu
Liu, FeiFei
Mao, ZongFu
Lu, YuanAn
Xiang, Hao
Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study
title Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study
title_full Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study
title_short Development of a global health bachelor curriculum in China: a Delphi study
title_sort development of a global health bachelor curriculum in china: a delphi study
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30610023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023893
work_keys_str_mv AT guanli developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT gaopan developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT liusuyang developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT liuyisi developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT lixiangyu developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT liufeifei developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT maozongfu developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT luyuanan developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy
AT xianghao developmentofaglobalhealthbachelorcurriculuminchinaadelphistudy