Cargando…
Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
OBJECTIVE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains a challenging technique. We compare the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted DMEK to manual DMEK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A manual descemetorhexis (DR) of 8 mm diameter was compared with a femtosecond laser-assisted DR of the same...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000148 |
_version_ | 1783386284126896128 |
---|---|
author | Pilger, Daniel von Sonnleithner, Christoph Bertelmann, Eckart Maier, Anna-Karina B Joussen, Antonia M Torun, Necip |
author_facet | Pilger, Daniel von Sonnleithner, Christoph Bertelmann, Eckart Maier, Anna-Karina B Joussen, Antonia M Torun, Necip |
author_sort | Pilger, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains a challenging technique. We compare the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted DMEK to manual DMEK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A manual descemetorhexis (DR) of 8 mm diameter was compared with a femtosecond laser-assisted DR of the same diameter (femto-DR) in 22 pseudophakic patients requiring DMEK. We used OCT images with a centred xy-diagram to measure the postoperative precision of the DR and the amount of endothelial denuded area. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) and best corrected visual acuity were measured 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the manual group, the median error of the DR was 7% (range 3%–16%) in the x-diameter and 8% (range 2%–17%) in the y-diameter. In the femto group, the median error in the respective x and y-diameters was 1% (range 0.4%–3%) and 1% (range 0.006%–2.5%), smaller than in the manual group (p=0.001). Endothelial denuded areas were larger in the manual group (11.6 mm(2), range 7.6–18 mm(2)) than in the femto group (2.5 mm(2), range 1.2–5.9 mm(2)) (p<0.001). The ECL was 21% (range 5%–78%) in the manual DR and 17% (range 6%–38%) in the femto-DR group (p=0.351). The median visual acuity increased from 0.4 logMAR (range 0.6–0.4 logMAR) in both groups to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.4–0 logMAR) in the manual group and to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.3–0 logMAR) in the femto group (p=0.461). Three rebubblings were required in the manual group, whereas the femto group required only one. CONCLUSION: The higher precision of the femto-DR bears the potential to improve DMEK surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6326344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63263442019-01-25 Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty Pilger, Daniel von Sonnleithner, Christoph Bertelmann, Eckart Maier, Anna-Karina B Joussen, Antonia M Torun, Necip BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains a challenging technique. We compare the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted DMEK to manual DMEK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A manual descemetorhexis (DR) of 8 mm diameter was compared with a femtosecond laser-assisted DR of the same diameter (femto-DR) in 22 pseudophakic patients requiring DMEK. We used OCT images with a centred xy-diagram to measure the postoperative precision of the DR and the amount of endothelial denuded area. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) and best corrected visual acuity were measured 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the manual group, the median error of the DR was 7% (range 3%–16%) in the x-diameter and 8% (range 2%–17%) in the y-diameter. In the femto group, the median error in the respective x and y-diameters was 1% (range 0.4%–3%) and 1% (range 0.006%–2.5%), smaller than in the manual group (p=0.001). Endothelial denuded areas were larger in the manual group (11.6 mm(2), range 7.6–18 mm(2)) than in the femto group (2.5 mm(2), range 1.2–5.9 mm(2)) (p<0.001). The ECL was 21% (range 5%–78%) in the manual DR and 17% (range 6%–38%) in the femto-DR group (p=0.351). The median visual acuity increased from 0.4 logMAR (range 0.6–0.4 logMAR) in both groups to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.4–0 logMAR) in the manual group and to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.3–0 logMAR) in the femto group (p=0.461). Three rebubblings were required in the manual group, whereas the femto group required only one. CONCLUSION: The higher precision of the femto-DR bears the potential to improve DMEK surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6326344/ /pubmed/30687781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000148 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pilger, Daniel von Sonnleithner, Christoph Bertelmann, Eckart Maier, Anna-Karina B Joussen, Antonia M Torun, Necip Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title | Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_full | Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_fullStr | Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_short | Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
title_sort | exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilgerdaniel exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT vonsonnleithnerchristoph exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT bertelmanneckart exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT maierannakarinab exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT joussenantoniam exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty AT torunnecip exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty |