Cargando…

Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

OBJECTIVE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains a challenging technique. We compare the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted DMEK to manual DMEK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A manual descemetorhexis (DR) of 8 mm diameter was compared with a femtosecond laser-assisted DR of the same...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilger, Daniel, von Sonnleithner, Christoph, Bertelmann, Eckart, Maier, Anna-Karina B, Joussen, Antonia M, Torun, Necip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000148
_version_ 1783386284126896128
author Pilger, Daniel
von Sonnleithner, Christoph
Bertelmann, Eckart
Maier, Anna-Karina B
Joussen, Antonia M
Torun, Necip
author_facet Pilger, Daniel
von Sonnleithner, Christoph
Bertelmann, Eckart
Maier, Anna-Karina B
Joussen, Antonia M
Torun, Necip
author_sort Pilger, Daniel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains a challenging technique. We compare the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted DMEK to manual DMEK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A manual descemetorhexis (DR) of 8 mm diameter was compared with a femtosecond laser-assisted DR of the same diameter (femto-DR) in 22 pseudophakic patients requiring DMEK. We used OCT images with a centred xy-diagram to measure the postoperative precision of the DR and the amount of endothelial denuded area. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) and best corrected visual acuity were measured 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the manual group, the median error of the DR was 7% (range 3%–16%) in the x-diameter and 8% (range 2%–17%) in the y-diameter. In the femto group, the median error in the respective x and y-diameters was 1% (range 0.4%–3%) and 1% (range 0.006%–2.5%), smaller than in the manual group (p=0.001). Endothelial denuded areas were larger in the manual group (11.6 mm(2), range 7.6–18 mm(2)) than in the femto group (2.5 mm(2), range 1.2–5.9 mm(2)) (p<0.001). The ECL was 21% (range 5%–78%) in the manual DR and 17% (range 6%–38%) in the femto-DR group (p=0.351). The median visual acuity increased from 0.4 logMAR (range 0.6–0.4 logMAR) in both groups to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.4–0 logMAR) in the manual group and to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.3–0 logMAR) in the femto group (p=0.461). Three rebubblings were required in the manual group, whereas the femto group required only one. CONCLUSION: The higher precision of the femto-DR bears the potential to improve DMEK surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6326344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63263442019-01-25 Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty Pilger, Daniel von Sonnleithner, Christoph Bertelmann, Eckart Maier, Anna-Karina B Joussen, Antonia M Torun, Necip BMJ Open Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) remains a challenging technique. We compare the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted DMEK to manual DMEK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A manual descemetorhexis (DR) of 8 mm diameter was compared with a femtosecond laser-assisted DR of the same diameter (femto-DR) in 22 pseudophakic patients requiring DMEK. We used OCT images with a centred xy-diagram to measure the postoperative precision of the DR and the amount of endothelial denuded area. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) and best corrected visual acuity were measured 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the manual group, the median error of the DR was 7% (range 3%–16%) in the x-diameter and 8% (range 2%–17%) in the y-diameter. In the femto group, the median error in the respective x and y-diameters was 1% (range 0.4%–3%) and 1% (range 0.006%–2.5%), smaller than in the manual group (p=0.001). Endothelial denuded areas were larger in the manual group (11.6 mm(2), range 7.6–18 mm(2)) than in the femto group (2.5 mm(2), range 1.2–5.9 mm(2)) (p<0.001). The ECL was 21% (range 5%–78%) in the manual DR and 17% (range 6%–38%) in the femto-DR group (p=0.351). The median visual acuity increased from 0.4 logMAR (range 0.6–0.4 logMAR) in both groups to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.4–0 logMAR) in the manual group and to 0.1 logMAR (range 0.3–0 logMAR) in the femto group (p=0.461). Three rebubblings were required in the manual group, whereas the femto group required only one. CONCLUSION: The higher precision of the femto-DR bears the potential to improve DMEK surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6326344/ /pubmed/30687781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000148 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Original Article
Pilger, Daniel
von Sonnleithner, Christoph
Bertelmann, Eckart
Maier, Anna-Karina B
Joussen, Antonia M
Torun, Necip
Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_full Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_fullStr Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_short Exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
title_sort exploring the precision of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000148
work_keys_str_mv AT pilgerdaniel exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT vonsonnleithnerchristoph exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT bertelmanneckart exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT maierannakarinab exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT joussenantoniam exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty
AT torunnecip exploringtheprecisionoffemtosecondlaserassisteddescemetorhexisindescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplasty