Cargando…

Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm

BACKGROUND: Traditional transverse mastectomies yield suboptimal results in women with higher body mass index, wide breast footprint, and ptotic breasts. An option for this patient population is a reduction-pattern style mastectomy, and recruiting an inferiorly based dermal flap using the lower mast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McFadden, Eoin M., Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz, Stone, Jill P., Webb, Carmen E., Temple-Oberle, Claire F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002027
_version_ 1783386325286649856
author McFadden, Eoin M.
Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz
Stone, Jill P.
Webb, Carmen E.
Temple-Oberle, Claire F.
author_facet McFadden, Eoin M.
Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz
Stone, Jill P.
Webb, Carmen E.
Temple-Oberle, Claire F.
author_sort McFadden, Eoin M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional transverse mastectomies yield suboptimal results in women with higher body mass index, wide breast footprint, and ptotic breasts. An option for this patient population is a reduction-pattern style mastectomy, and recruiting an inferiorly based dermal flap using the lower mastectomy flap. This is analogous to a vascularized dermal matrix supporting the lower pole of the implant, termed “Autoderm” breast reconstruction. This allows for aesthetically appealing skin reduction mastectomies with the added safety of a vascularized dermal flap to facilitate an immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. This study assesses patient satisfaction using the validated BRECON-31 questionnaire to enhance shared-decision making with women contemplating breast reconstruction. METHODS: A 2-year retrospective review of women who underwent Autoderm direct-to-implant breast reconstruction comparing patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral reconstruction in terms of characteristics, complications, and BRECON-31 scoring. RESULTS: Overall patient scores were high (81.6 of 100). In particular, women scored very high on self-image (85.0), arm concerns (86.4), intimacy (87.4), satisfaction (88.3), and expectations subscales (85.5). Women choosing bilateral reconstruction outperformed unilateral reconstruction in every subgroup, but only attained statistical significance in the “self-consciousness” subgroup. Compared with a historical cohort of a mix of implant reconstruction types, Autoderm patients showed improved satisfaction (88.3 versus 82.5; P = 0.07) and breast appearance (73.9 versus 66.8; P = 0.06), approaching significance. Safety was demonstrated by low major complications (4.7%) and low implant loss rates (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Autoderm breast reconstruction is a safe option in women with large, ptotic breasts, with patients reporting high satisfaction using a validated instrument.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6326604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63266042019-01-17 Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm McFadden, Eoin M. Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz Stone, Jill P. Webb, Carmen E. Temple-Oberle, Claire F. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Traditional transverse mastectomies yield suboptimal results in women with higher body mass index, wide breast footprint, and ptotic breasts. An option for this patient population is a reduction-pattern style mastectomy, and recruiting an inferiorly based dermal flap using the lower mastectomy flap. This is analogous to a vascularized dermal matrix supporting the lower pole of the implant, termed “Autoderm” breast reconstruction. This allows for aesthetically appealing skin reduction mastectomies with the added safety of a vascularized dermal flap to facilitate an immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. This study assesses patient satisfaction using the validated BRECON-31 questionnaire to enhance shared-decision making with women contemplating breast reconstruction. METHODS: A 2-year retrospective review of women who underwent Autoderm direct-to-implant breast reconstruction comparing patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral reconstruction in terms of characteristics, complications, and BRECON-31 scoring. RESULTS: Overall patient scores were high (81.6 of 100). In particular, women scored very high on self-image (85.0), arm concerns (86.4), intimacy (87.4), satisfaction (88.3), and expectations subscales (85.5). Women choosing bilateral reconstruction outperformed unilateral reconstruction in every subgroup, but only attained statistical significance in the “self-consciousness” subgroup. Compared with a historical cohort of a mix of implant reconstruction types, Autoderm patients showed improved satisfaction (88.3 versus 82.5; P = 0.07) and breast appearance (73.9 versus 66.8; P = 0.06), approaching significance. Safety was demonstrated by low major complications (4.7%) and low implant loss rates (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Autoderm breast reconstruction is a safe option in women with large, ptotic breasts, with patients reporting high satisfaction using a validated instrument. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6326604/ /pubmed/30656114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002027 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
McFadden, Eoin M.
Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz
Stone, Jill P.
Webb, Carmen E.
Temple-Oberle, Claire F.
Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
title Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
title_full Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
title_fullStr Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
title_full_unstemmed Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
title_short Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
title_sort direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with autoderm
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002027
work_keys_str_mv AT mcfaddeneoinm directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm
AT lopezobregonbeatriz directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm
AT stonejillp directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm
AT webbcarmene directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm
AT templeoberleclairef directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm