Cargando…
Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm
BACKGROUND: Traditional transverse mastectomies yield suboptimal results in women with higher body mass index, wide breast footprint, and ptotic breasts. An option for this patient population is a reduction-pattern style mastectomy, and recruiting an inferiorly based dermal flap using the lower mast...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002027 |
_version_ | 1783386325286649856 |
---|---|
author | McFadden, Eoin M. Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz Stone, Jill P. Webb, Carmen E. Temple-Oberle, Claire F. |
author_facet | McFadden, Eoin M. Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz Stone, Jill P. Webb, Carmen E. Temple-Oberle, Claire F. |
author_sort | McFadden, Eoin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional transverse mastectomies yield suboptimal results in women with higher body mass index, wide breast footprint, and ptotic breasts. An option for this patient population is a reduction-pattern style mastectomy, and recruiting an inferiorly based dermal flap using the lower mastectomy flap. This is analogous to a vascularized dermal matrix supporting the lower pole of the implant, termed “Autoderm” breast reconstruction. This allows for aesthetically appealing skin reduction mastectomies with the added safety of a vascularized dermal flap to facilitate an immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. This study assesses patient satisfaction using the validated BRECON-31 questionnaire to enhance shared-decision making with women contemplating breast reconstruction. METHODS: A 2-year retrospective review of women who underwent Autoderm direct-to-implant breast reconstruction comparing patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral reconstruction in terms of characteristics, complications, and BRECON-31 scoring. RESULTS: Overall patient scores were high (81.6 of 100). In particular, women scored very high on self-image (85.0), arm concerns (86.4), intimacy (87.4), satisfaction (88.3), and expectations subscales (85.5). Women choosing bilateral reconstruction outperformed unilateral reconstruction in every subgroup, but only attained statistical significance in the “self-consciousness” subgroup. Compared with a historical cohort of a mix of implant reconstruction types, Autoderm patients showed improved satisfaction (88.3 versus 82.5; P = 0.07) and breast appearance (73.9 versus 66.8; P = 0.06), approaching significance. Safety was demonstrated by low major complications (4.7%) and low implant loss rates (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Autoderm breast reconstruction is a safe option in women with large, ptotic breasts, with patients reporting high satisfaction using a validated instrument. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6326604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63266042019-01-17 Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm McFadden, Eoin M. Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz Stone, Jill P. Webb, Carmen E. Temple-Oberle, Claire F. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Traditional transverse mastectomies yield suboptimal results in women with higher body mass index, wide breast footprint, and ptotic breasts. An option for this patient population is a reduction-pattern style mastectomy, and recruiting an inferiorly based dermal flap using the lower mastectomy flap. This is analogous to a vascularized dermal matrix supporting the lower pole of the implant, termed “Autoderm” breast reconstruction. This allows for aesthetically appealing skin reduction mastectomies with the added safety of a vascularized dermal flap to facilitate an immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. This study assesses patient satisfaction using the validated BRECON-31 questionnaire to enhance shared-decision making with women contemplating breast reconstruction. METHODS: A 2-year retrospective review of women who underwent Autoderm direct-to-implant breast reconstruction comparing patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral reconstruction in terms of characteristics, complications, and BRECON-31 scoring. RESULTS: Overall patient scores were high (81.6 of 100). In particular, women scored very high on self-image (85.0), arm concerns (86.4), intimacy (87.4), satisfaction (88.3), and expectations subscales (85.5). Women choosing bilateral reconstruction outperformed unilateral reconstruction in every subgroup, but only attained statistical significance in the “self-consciousness” subgroup. Compared with a historical cohort of a mix of implant reconstruction types, Autoderm patients showed improved satisfaction (88.3 versus 82.5; P = 0.07) and breast appearance (73.9 versus 66.8; P = 0.06), approaching significance. Safety was demonstrated by low major complications (4.7%) and low implant loss rates (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Autoderm breast reconstruction is a safe option in women with large, ptotic breasts, with patients reporting high satisfaction using a validated instrument. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6326604/ /pubmed/30656114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002027 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article McFadden, Eoin M. Lopez-Obregon, Beatriz Stone, Jill P. Webb, Carmen E. Temple-Oberle, Claire F. Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm |
title | Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm |
title_full | Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm |
title_fullStr | Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm |
title_short | Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction with Autoderm |
title_sort | direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with autoderm |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcfaddeneoinm directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm AT lopezobregonbeatriz directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm AT stonejillp directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm AT webbcarmene directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm AT templeoberleclairef directtoimplantbreastreconstructionwithautoderm |