Cargando…
Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist
Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their priority setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all p...
Autores principales: | Jansen, Maarten P.M., Baltussen, Rob, Bærøe, Kristine |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30624870 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.57 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?
por: Magelssen, Morten, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design − Part I: Conceptual Framework
por: Baltussen, Rob, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice
: Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy"
por: Jansen, Maarten P., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Defending legitimate epidemiologic research: combating Lysenko pseudoscience
por: Enstrom, James E
Publicado: (2007) -
A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting
por: Tomlinson, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2011)