Cargando…

Patient-ventilator asynchrony

Patient-v entilator asynchrony (PVA) is a mismatch between the patient, regarding time, flow, volume, or pressure demands of the patient respiratory system, and the ventilator, which supplies such demands, during mechanical ventilation (MV). It is a common phenomenon, with incidence rates ranging fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara, Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos, Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho, Pinheiro, Bruno Valle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30020347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-375644-04-00321
_version_ 1783386348565037056
author Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos
Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho
Pinheiro, Bruno Valle
author_facet Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos
Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho
Pinheiro, Bruno Valle
author_sort Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
collection PubMed
description Patient-v entilator asynchrony (PVA) is a mismatch between the patient, regarding time, flow, volume, or pressure demands of the patient respiratory system, and the ventilator, which supplies such demands, during mechanical ventilation (MV). It is a common phenomenon, with incidence rates ranging from 10% to 85%. PVA might be due to factors related to the patient, to the ventilator, or both. The most common PVA types are those related to triggering, such as ineffective effort, auto-triggering, and double triggering; those related to premature or delayed cycling; and those related to insufficient or excessive flow. Each of these types can be detected by visual inspection of volume, flow, and pressure waveforms on the mechanical ventilator display. Specific ventilatory strategies can be used in combination with clinical management, such as controlling patient pain, anxiety, fever, etc. Deep sedation should be avoided whenever possible. PVA has been associated with unwanted outcomes, such as discomfort, dyspnea, worsening of pulmonary gas exchange, increased work of breathing, diaphragmatic injury, sleep impairment, and increased use of sedation or neuromuscular blockade, as well as increases in the duration of MV, weaning time, and mortality. Proportional assist ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist are modalities of partial ventilatory support that reduce PVA and have shown promise. This article reviews the literature on the types and causes of PVA, as well as the methods used in its evaluation, its potential implications in the recovery process of critically ill patients, and strategies for its resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6326703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63267032019-01-17 Patient-ventilator asynchrony Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho Pinheiro, Bruno Valle J Bras Pneumol Review Article Patient-v entilator asynchrony (PVA) is a mismatch between the patient, regarding time, flow, volume, or pressure demands of the patient respiratory system, and the ventilator, which supplies such demands, during mechanical ventilation (MV). It is a common phenomenon, with incidence rates ranging from 10% to 85%. PVA might be due to factors related to the patient, to the ventilator, or both. The most common PVA types are those related to triggering, such as ineffective effort, auto-triggering, and double triggering; those related to premature or delayed cycling; and those related to insufficient or excessive flow. Each of these types can be detected by visual inspection of volume, flow, and pressure waveforms on the mechanical ventilator display. Specific ventilatory strategies can be used in combination with clinical management, such as controlling patient pain, anxiety, fever, etc. Deep sedation should be avoided whenever possible. PVA has been associated with unwanted outcomes, such as discomfort, dyspnea, worsening of pulmonary gas exchange, increased work of breathing, diaphragmatic injury, sleep impairment, and increased use of sedation or neuromuscular blockade, as well as increases in the duration of MV, weaning time, and mortality. Proportional assist ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist are modalities of partial ventilatory support that reduce PVA and have shown promise. This article reviews the literature on the types and causes of PVA, as well as the methods used in its evaluation, its potential implications in the recovery process of critically ill patients, and strategies for its resolution. Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6326703/ /pubmed/30020347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-375644-04-00321 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Review Article
Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos
Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho
Pinheiro, Bruno Valle
Patient-ventilator asynchrony
title Patient-ventilator asynchrony
title_full Patient-ventilator asynchrony
title_fullStr Patient-ventilator asynchrony
title_full_unstemmed Patient-ventilator asynchrony
title_short Patient-ventilator asynchrony
title_sort patient-ventilator asynchrony
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6326703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30020347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-375644-04-00321
work_keys_str_mv AT holandamarceloalcantara patientventilatorasynchrony
AT vasconcelosrenatadossantos patientventilatorasynchrony
AT ferreirajulianacarvalho patientventilatorasynchrony
AT pinheirobrunovalle patientventilatorasynchrony