Cargando…

A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia

OBJECTIVES: Isolated mandibular fractures contribute to approximately 45% of maxillofacial traumas. Improper management of mandibular fractures can cause myriad potential complications and can lead to serious functional and aesthetic sequelae. The objective of the study is to design a stepwise appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chellappa, Natarajan, Meshram, Vikas, Kende, Prajwalit, Landge, Jayant, Aggarwal, Neha, Tiwari, Manish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637241
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.275
_version_ 1783386391967694848
author Chellappa, Natarajan
Meshram, Vikas
Kende, Prajwalit
Landge, Jayant
Aggarwal, Neha
Tiwari, Manish
author_facet Chellappa, Natarajan
Meshram, Vikas
Kende, Prajwalit
Landge, Jayant
Aggarwal, Neha
Tiwari, Manish
author_sort Chellappa, Natarajan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Isolated mandibular fractures contribute to approximately 45% of maxillofacial traumas. Improper management of mandibular fractures can cause myriad potential complications and can lead to serious functional and aesthetic sequelae. The objective of the study is to design a stepwise approach for managing isolated mandibular fractures using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with regional anesthesia on outpatient basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with isolated mandibular fractures presenting to the department of maxillofacial surgery were selected for ORIF under regional anesthesia based on occlusion, age, socioeconomic status, general condition, habits, and allied medical ailments. Standard preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols were followed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 weeks up to a maximum of 1 year. RESULTS: Of 23 patients who received regional anesthesia, all but one had good postoperative functional occlusion. One patient was hypersensitive and had difficulty tolerating the procedure. Two patients developed an extraoral draining sinus, one of whom was managed with local curettage, while the other required hardware removal. One patient, who was a chronic alcoholic, returned 1 week after treatment with deranged fracture segments after he fell while intoxicated. CONCLUSION: With proper case selection following a stepwise protocol, the majority of mandibular fractures requiring ORIF can be managed with regional anesthesia and yield minimal to no complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63270132019-01-11 A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia Chellappa, Natarajan Meshram, Vikas Kende, Prajwalit Landge, Jayant Aggarwal, Neha Tiwari, Manish J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: Isolated mandibular fractures contribute to approximately 45% of maxillofacial traumas. Improper management of mandibular fractures can cause myriad potential complications and can lead to serious functional and aesthetic sequelae. The objective of the study is to design a stepwise approach for managing isolated mandibular fractures using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with regional anesthesia on outpatient basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with isolated mandibular fractures presenting to the department of maxillofacial surgery were selected for ORIF under regional anesthesia based on occlusion, age, socioeconomic status, general condition, habits, and allied medical ailments. Standard preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative protocols were followed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 weeks up to a maximum of 1 year. RESULTS: Of 23 patients who received regional anesthesia, all but one had good postoperative functional occlusion. One patient was hypersensitive and had difficulty tolerating the procedure. Two patients developed an extraoral draining sinus, one of whom was managed with local curettage, while the other required hardware removal. One patient, who was a chronic alcoholic, returned 1 week after treatment with deranged fracture segments after he fell while intoxicated. CONCLUSION: With proper case selection following a stepwise protocol, the majority of mandibular fractures requiring ORIF can be managed with regional anesthesia and yield minimal to no complications. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2018-12 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6327013/ /pubmed/30637241 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.275 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chellappa, Natarajan
Meshram, Vikas
Kende, Prajwalit
Landge, Jayant
Aggarwal, Neha
Tiwari, Manish
A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
title A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
title_full A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
title_fullStr A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
title_short A working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
title_sort working paradigm for managing mandibular fractures under regional anesthesia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637241
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.6.275
work_keys_str_mv AT chellappanatarajan aworkingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT meshramvikas aworkingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT kendeprajwalit aworkingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT landgejayant aworkingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT aggarwalneha aworkingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT tiwarimanish aworkingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT chellappanatarajan workingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT meshramvikas workingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT kendeprajwalit workingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT landgejayant workingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT aggarwalneha workingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia
AT tiwarimanish workingparadigmformanagingmandibularfracturesunderregionalanesthesia