Cargando…

Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy

BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached in patients suspected of having inadequate bowel preparation regarding optimal salvage methods, which negatively affects the efficacy and quality of colonoscopy. The most ideal and reasonable rescue option involves early suspicion and identification of patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Joon Hyun, Goo, Eun Joo, Kim, Kyeong Ok, Lee, Si Hyung, Jang, Byung Ik, Kim, Tae Nyeun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637251
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
_version_ 1783386417643126784
author Cho, Joon Hyun
Goo, Eun Joo
Kim, Kyeong Ok
Lee, Si Hyung
Jang, Byung Ik
Kim, Tae Nyeun
author_facet Cho, Joon Hyun
Goo, Eun Joo
Kim, Kyeong Ok
Lee, Si Hyung
Jang, Byung Ik
Kim, Tae Nyeun
author_sort Cho, Joon Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached in patients suspected of having inadequate bowel preparation regarding optimal salvage methods, which negatively affects the efficacy and quality of colonoscopy. The most ideal and reasonable rescue option involves early suspicion and identification of patients with inadequate preparation before sedation, additional oral ingestion of a suitable preparation formulation, and same-day colonoscopy. AIM: To compare 0.5-L and 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) as additional bowel cleansing methods after a 2-L split-dose PEG + Asc regimen in patients with expected inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS: Individuals with expected inadequate bowel preparation based on last stool form, such as turbid liquid, particulate liquid, or liquid with small amounts of feces, were randomized to either a 0.5-L PEG + Asc group or a 1-L PEG + Asc group. The primary endpoint was bowel preparation as assessed using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale (ABPS) and Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) scores. The secondary endpoints were cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), individual compliance with additional PEG + Asc, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Initially, 98 patients were included, but 8 were later excluded due to withdrawal of consent to participate in the study. Adequate bowel preparation (as assessed by ABPS) was observed in 80.9% (38/47) of subjects in the 0.5-L group and in 88.4% (38/43) of subjects in the 1-L group (P = 0.617). Mean total BBPS was 6.7 points in the 0.5-L group and 7.0 points in the 1-L group (P = 0.458). ADRs and PDRs were similar in the two groups, and cecal intubation and withdrawal times were not significantly different. However, mean patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the 0.5-L group (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: The bowel cleaning efficacy of additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc was not inferior to that of 1-L PEG + Asc. Additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc is worthwhile when inadequate bowel preparation is expected before colonoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63271352019-01-11 Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy Cho, Joon Hyun Goo, Eun Joo Kim, Kyeong Ok Lee, Si Hyung Jang, Byung Ik Kim, Tae Nyeun World J Clin Cases Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: No consensus has been reached in patients suspected of having inadequate bowel preparation regarding optimal salvage methods, which negatively affects the efficacy and quality of colonoscopy. The most ideal and reasonable rescue option involves early suspicion and identification of patients with inadequate preparation before sedation, additional oral ingestion of a suitable preparation formulation, and same-day colonoscopy. AIM: To compare 0.5-L and 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) as additional bowel cleansing methods after a 2-L split-dose PEG + Asc regimen in patients with expected inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS: Individuals with expected inadequate bowel preparation based on last stool form, such as turbid liquid, particulate liquid, or liquid with small amounts of feces, were randomized to either a 0.5-L PEG + Asc group or a 1-L PEG + Asc group. The primary endpoint was bowel preparation as assessed using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale (ABPS) and Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) scores. The secondary endpoints were cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), individual compliance with additional PEG + Asc, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Initially, 98 patients were included, but 8 were later excluded due to withdrawal of consent to participate in the study. Adequate bowel preparation (as assessed by ABPS) was observed in 80.9% (38/47) of subjects in the 0.5-L group and in 88.4% (38/43) of subjects in the 1-L group (P = 0.617). Mean total BBPS was 6.7 points in the 0.5-L group and 7.0 points in the 1-L group (P = 0.458). ADRs and PDRs were similar in the two groups, and cecal intubation and withdrawal times were not significantly different. However, mean patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the 0.5-L group (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: The bowel cleaning efficacy of additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc was not inferior to that of 1-L PEG + Asc. Additional 0.5-L PEG + Asc is worthwhile when inadequate bowel preparation is expected before colonoscopy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-01-06 2019-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6327135/ /pubmed/30637251 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Cho, Joon Hyun
Goo, Eun Joo
Kim, Kyeong Ok
Lee, Si Hyung
Jang, Byung Ik
Kim, Tae Nyeun
Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
title Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
title_full Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
title_fullStr Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
title_short Efficacy of 0.5-L vs 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
title_sort efficacy of 0.5-l vs 1-l polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637251
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39
work_keys_str_mv AT chojoonhyun efficacyof05lvs1lpolyethyleneglycolcontainingascorbicacidasadditionalcoloncleansingmethodsforinadequatebowelpreparationasexpectedbylaststoolexaminationbeforecolonoscopy
AT gooeunjoo efficacyof05lvs1lpolyethyleneglycolcontainingascorbicacidasadditionalcoloncleansingmethodsforinadequatebowelpreparationasexpectedbylaststoolexaminationbeforecolonoscopy
AT kimkyeongok efficacyof05lvs1lpolyethyleneglycolcontainingascorbicacidasadditionalcoloncleansingmethodsforinadequatebowelpreparationasexpectedbylaststoolexaminationbeforecolonoscopy
AT leesihyung efficacyof05lvs1lpolyethyleneglycolcontainingascorbicacidasadditionalcoloncleansingmethodsforinadequatebowelpreparationasexpectedbylaststoolexaminationbeforecolonoscopy
AT jangbyungik efficacyof05lvs1lpolyethyleneglycolcontainingascorbicacidasadditionalcoloncleansingmethodsforinadequatebowelpreparationasexpectedbylaststoolexaminationbeforecolonoscopy
AT kimtaenyeun efficacyof05lvs1lpolyethyleneglycolcontainingascorbicacidasadditionalcoloncleansingmethodsforinadequatebowelpreparationasexpectedbylaststoolexaminationbeforecolonoscopy