Cargando…

Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers

Nonjudicious antimicrobial use (AMU) and inadequate antimicrobial stewardship are known modifiable factors driving the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A mixed methods approach using a combination of focus groups and survey questionnaires was used to explore the AMU practices of Tenness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekakoro, John E., Caldwell, Marc, Strand, Elizabeth B., Okafor, Chika C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1836836
_version_ 1783386438098747392
author Ekakoro, John E.
Caldwell, Marc
Strand, Elizabeth B.
Okafor, Chika C.
author_facet Ekakoro, John E.
Caldwell, Marc
Strand, Elizabeth B.
Okafor, Chika C.
author_sort Ekakoro, John E.
collection PubMed
description Nonjudicious antimicrobial use (AMU) and inadequate antimicrobial stewardship are known modifiable factors driving the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A mixed methods approach using a combination of focus groups and survey questionnaires was used to explore the AMU practices of Tennessee (TN) dairy cattle producers. Specifically, the objectives of the study were to determine the following: (1) the most common drivers for using antimicrobials, (2) perceived alternatives to antimicrobials, (3) knowledge of and perceptions regarding AMR, (4) and the appropriate avenues for receiving information on prudent AMU. Two focus groups were conducted, one in July 2017 and the other in March 2018. The questionnaire was simultaneously made available to participants both in print form and online from January 26, 2018, through May 11, 2018. Twenty-three dairy producers participated in the focus groups and 45 responded to the survey. Eight (18.6%) producers never used bacterial culture and sensitivity testing (C/S) to select antimicrobials, more than half (25 producers (58.1%)) sometimes used C/S, four (9.3%) used C/S about half the time, five (11.6%) most of the time, and one (2.3%) always used C/S. The most common drivers for using antimicrobials were disease and animal welfare, pathogen surveillance, economic factors, veterinarian recommendation, producer's experience and judgment, drug attributes, and the Veterinary Feed Directive. Good management practices, vaccination, use of immunomodulatory products, and use of appropriate technology for early disease detection were considered alternatives to AMU. Four (9.1%) dairy producers were very concerned about AMR, 27 (61.4%) moderately concerned, and 10 (22.7%) not concerned. The veterinarian was considered to be a trusted source of information on prudent AMU. Use of C/S test results for antimicrobial selection is widespread among TN dairy producers. There is a need to popularize/promote selective dry cow therapy among TN dairy producers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63272732019-01-27 Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers Ekakoro, John E. Caldwell, Marc Strand, Elizabeth B. Okafor, Chika C. Vet Med Int Research Article Nonjudicious antimicrobial use (AMU) and inadequate antimicrobial stewardship are known modifiable factors driving the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A mixed methods approach using a combination of focus groups and survey questionnaires was used to explore the AMU practices of Tennessee (TN) dairy cattle producers. Specifically, the objectives of the study were to determine the following: (1) the most common drivers for using antimicrobials, (2) perceived alternatives to antimicrobials, (3) knowledge of and perceptions regarding AMR, (4) and the appropriate avenues for receiving information on prudent AMU. Two focus groups were conducted, one in July 2017 and the other in March 2018. The questionnaire was simultaneously made available to participants both in print form and online from January 26, 2018, through May 11, 2018. Twenty-three dairy producers participated in the focus groups and 45 responded to the survey. Eight (18.6%) producers never used bacterial culture and sensitivity testing (C/S) to select antimicrobials, more than half (25 producers (58.1%)) sometimes used C/S, four (9.3%) used C/S about half the time, five (11.6%) most of the time, and one (2.3%) always used C/S. The most common drivers for using antimicrobials were disease and animal welfare, pathogen surveillance, economic factors, veterinarian recommendation, producer's experience and judgment, drug attributes, and the Veterinary Feed Directive. Good management practices, vaccination, use of immunomodulatory products, and use of appropriate technology for early disease detection were considered alternatives to AMU. Four (9.1%) dairy producers were very concerned about AMR, 27 (61.4%) moderately concerned, and 10 (22.7%) not concerned. The veterinarian was considered to be a trusted source of information on prudent AMU. Use of C/S test results for antimicrobial selection is widespread among TN dairy producers. There is a need to popularize/promote selective dry cow therapy among TN dairy producers. Hindawi 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6327273/ /pubmed/30687493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1836836 Text en Copyright © 2018 John E. Ekakoro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ekakoro, John E.
Caldwell, Marc
Strand, Elizabeth B.
Okafor, Chika C.
Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers
title Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers
title_full Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers
title_fullStr Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers
title_short Drivers of Antimicrobial Use Practices among Tennessee Dairy Cattle Producers
title_sort drivers of antimicrobial use practices among tennessee dairy cattle producers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30687493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1836836
work_keys_str_mv AT ekakorojohne driversofantimicrobialusepracticesamongtennesseedairycattleproducers
AT caldwellmarc driversofantimicrobialusepracticesamongtennesseedairycattleproducers
AT strandelizabethb driversofantimicrobialusepracticesamongtennesseedairycattleproducers
AT okaforchikac driversofantimicrobialusepracticesamongtennesseedairycattleproducers