Cargando…

Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of unsupervised high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular autonomic function in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 22 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 60 ± 2 years, 17 males) lay in a supine po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassidy, Sophie, Vaidya, Vivek, Houghton, David, Zalewski, Pawel, Seferovic, Jelena P, Hallsworth, Kate, MacGowan, Guy A, Trenell, Michael I, Jakovljevic, Djordje G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164118816223
_version_ 1783386445013057536
author Cassidy, Sophie
Vaidya, Vivek
Houghton, David
Zalewski, Pawel
Seferovic, Jelena P
Hallsworth, Kate
MacGowan, Guy A
Trenell, Michael I
Jakovljevic, Djordje G
author_facet Cassidy, Sophie
Vaidya, Vivek
Houghton, David
Zalewski, Pawel
Seferovic, Jelena P
Hallsworth, Kate
MacGowan, Guy A
Trenell, Michael I
Jakovljevic, Djordje G
author_sort Cassidy, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of unsupervised high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular autonomic function in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 22 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 60 ± 2 years, 17 males) lay in a supine position for 20 min for evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic function, which included (1) time domain measures of heart rate variability, (2) frequency domain measures of heart rate variability and blood pressure variability and (3) baroreflex receptor sensitivity. Participants were randomised into 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training (3 sessions/week) or standard care control group. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, the between-group change in HbA(1c) (%) was significant (high-intensity interval training: 7.13 ± 0.31 to 6.87 ± 0.29 vs Control: 7.18 ± 0.17 to 7.36 ± 0.21, p = 0.03). There were no significant changes in measures of heart rate variability; R-R interval (ms) (high-intensity interval training: 954 ± 49 to 973 ± 53 vs Control: 920 ± 6 to 930 ± 32, p = 0.672), low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.90 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.07 vs Control: 1.20 ± 0.29 to 1.00 ± 0.17, p = 0.203), or blood pressure variability; systolic blood pressure low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.86 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.10 vs Control: 1.06 ± 0.26 to 0.91 ± 0.14, p = 0.169). At baseline, HbA(1c) was negatively correlated with baroreflex receptor sensitivity (r = –0.592, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: High-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but has limited effect on cardiovascular autonomic regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63273032019-01-21 Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial Cassidy, Sophie Vaidya, Vivek Houghton, David Zalewski, Pawel Seferovic, Jelena P Hallsworth, Kate MacGowan, Guy A Trenell, Michael I Jakovljevic, Djordje G Diab Vasc Dis Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of unsupervised high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular autonomic function in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 22 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 60 ± 2 years, 17 males) lay in a supine position for 20 min for evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic function, which included (1) time domain measures of heart rate variability, (2) frequency domain measures of heart rate variability and blood pressure variability and (3) baroreflex receptor sensitivity. Participants were randomised into 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training (3 sessions/week) or standard care control group. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, the between-group change in HbA(1c) (%) was significant (high-intensity interval training: 7.13 ± 0.31 to 6.87 ± 0.29 vs Control: 7.18 ± 0.17 to 7.36 ± 0.21, p = 0.03). There were no significant changes in measures of heart rate variability; R-R interval (ms) (high-intensity interval training: 954 ± 49 to 973 ± 53 vs Control: 920 ± 6 to 930 ± 32, p = 0.672), low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.90 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.07 vs Control: 1.20 ± 0.29 to 1.00 ± 0.17, p = 0.203), or blood pressure variability; systolic blood pressure low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.86 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.10 vs Control: 1.06 ± 0.26 to 0.91 ± 0.14, p = 0.169). At baseline, HbA(1c) was negatively correlated with baroreflex receptor sensitivity (r = –0.592, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: High-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but has limited effect on cardiovascular autonomic regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. SAGE Publications 2018-12-12 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6327303/ /pubmed/30541346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164118816223 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cassidy, Sophie
Vaidya, Vivek
Houghton, David
Zalewski, Pawel
Seferovic, Jelena P
Hallsworth, Kate
MacGowan, Guy A
Trenell, Michael I
Jakovljevic, Djordje G
Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
title Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
title_full Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
title_short Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
title_sort unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164118816223
work_keys_str_mv AT cassidysophie unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vaidyavivek unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT houghtondavid unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zalewskipawel unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT seferovicjelenap unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hallsworthkate unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macgowanguya unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT trenellmichaeli unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jakovljevicdjordjeg unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial