Cargando…
Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of unsupervised high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular autonomic function in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 22 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 60 ± 2 years, 17 males) lay in a supine po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164118816223 |
_version_ | 1783386445013057536 |
---|---|
author | Cassidy, Sophie Vaidya, Vivek Houghton, David Zalewski, Pawel Seferovic, Jelena P Hallsworth, Kate MacGowan, Guy A Trenell, Michael I Jakovljevic, Djordje G |
author_facet | Cassidy, Sophie Vaidya, Vivek Houghton, David Zalewski, Pawel Seferovic, Jelena P Hallsworth, Kate MacGowan, Guy A Trenell, Michael I Jakovljevic, Djordje G |
author_sort | Cassidy, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of unsupervised high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular autonomic function in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 22 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 60 ± 2 years, 17 males) lay in a supine position for 20 min for evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic function, which included (1) time domain measures of heart rate variability, (2) frequency domain measures of heart rate variability and blood pressure variability and (3) baroreflex receptor sensitivity. Participants were randomised into 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training (3 sessions/week) or standard care control group. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, the between-group change in HbA(1c) (%) was significant (high-intensity interval training: 7.13 ± 0.31 to 6.87 ± 0.29 vs Control: 7.18 ± 0.17 to 7.36 ± 0.21, p = 0.03). There were no significant changes in measures of heart rate variability; R-R interval (ms) (high-intensity interval training: 954 ± 49 to 973 ± 53 vs Control: 920 ± 6 to 930 ± 32, p = 0.672), low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.90 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.07 vs Control: 1.20 ± 0.29 to 1.00 ± 0.17, p = 0.203), or blood pressure variability; systolic blood pressure low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.86 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.10 vs Control: 1.06 ± 0.26 to 0.91 ± 0.14, p = 0.169). At baseline, HbA(1c) was negatively correlated with baroreflex receptor sensitivity (r = –0.592, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: High-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but has limited effect on cardiovascular autonomic regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6327303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63273032019-01-21 Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial Cassidy, Sophie Vaidya, Vivek Houghton, David Zalewski, Pawel Seferovic, Jelena P Hallsworth, Kate MacGowan, Guy A Trenell, Michael I Jakovljevic, Djordje G Diab Vasc Dis Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: This is the first randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of unsupervised high-intensity interval training on cardiovascular autonomic function in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 22 individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 60 ± 2 years, 17 males) lay in a supine position for 20 min for evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic function, which included (1) time domain measures of heart rate variability, (2) frequency domain measures of heart rate variability and blood pressure variability and (3) baroreflex receptor sensitivity. Participants were randomised into 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training (3 sessions/week) or standard care control group. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, the between-group change in HbA(1c) (%) was significant (high-intensity interval training: 7.13 ± 0.31 to 6.87 ± 0.29 vs Control: 7.18 ± 0.17 to 7.36 ± 0.21, p = 0.03). There were no significant changes in measures of heart rate variability; R-R interval (ms) (high-intensity interval training: 954 ± 49 to 973 ± 53 vs Control: 920 ± 6 to 930 ± 32, p = 0.672), low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.90 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.07 vs Control: 1.20 ± 0.29 to 1.00 ± 0.17, p = 0.203), or blood pressure variability; systolic blood pressure low frequency/high frequency (high-intensity interval training: 0.86 ± 0.21 to 0.73 ± 0.10 vs Control: 1.06 ± 0.26 to 0.91 ± 0.14, p = 0.169). At baseline, HbA(1c) was negatively correlated with baroreflex receptor sensitivity (r = –0.592, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: High-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but has limited effect on cardiovascular autonomic regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. SAGE Publications 2018-12-12 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6327303/ /pubmed/30541346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164118816223 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cassidy, Sophie Vaidya, Vivek Houghton, David Zalewski, Pawel Seferovic, Jelena P Hallsworth, Kate MacGowan, Guy A Trenell, Michael I Jakovljevic, Djordje G Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial |
title | Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: A randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | unsupervised high-intensity interval training improves glycaemic control but not cardiovascular autonomic function in type 2 diabetes patients: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164118816223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cassidysophie unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vaidyavivek unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT houghtondavid unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zalewskipawel unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT seferovicjelenap unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hallsworthkate unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT macgowanguya unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT trenellmichaeli unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jakovljevicdjordjeg unsupervisedhighintensityintervaltrainingimprovesglycaemiccontrolbutnotcardiovascularautonomicfunctionintype2diabetespatientsarandomisedcontrolledtrial |