Cargando…

Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown variable effect on tinnitus. A prospective, randomized 6-month follow-up study on parallel groups was conducted to compare the effects of neuronavigated rTMS to non-navigated rTMS in chronic tinnitus. Forty patients (20 men, 20 women), me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahlsten, Hanna, Holm, Anu, Rauhala, Esa, Takala, Mari, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Karukivi, Max, Nikkilä, Johanna, Ylitalo, Kirsi, Paavola, Janika, Johansson, Reijo, Taiminen, Tero, Jääskeläinen, Satu K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30803387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216518822198
_version_ 1783386445911687168
author Sahlsten, Hanna
Holm, Anu
Rauhala, Esa
Takala, Mari
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Karukivi, Max
Nikkilä, Johanna
Ylitalo, Kirsi
Paavola, Janika
Johansson, Reijo
Taiminen, Tero
Jääskeläinen, Satu K.
author_facet Sahlsten, Hanna
Holm, Anu
Rauhala, Esa
Takala, Mari
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Karukivi, Max
Nikkilä, Johanna
Ylitalo, Kirsi
Paavola, Janika
Johansson, Reijo
Taiminen, Tero
Jääskeläinen, Satu K.
author_sort Sahlsten, Hanna
collection PubMed
description Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown variable effect on tinnitus. A prospective, randomized 6-month follow-up study on parallel groups was conducted to compare the effects of neuronavigated rTMS to non-navigated rTMS in chronic tinnitus. Forty patients (20 men, 20 women), mean age of 52.9 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.7), with a mean tinnitus duration of 5.8 years (SD = 3.2) and a mean tinnitus intensity of 62.2/100 (SD = 12.8) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0–100) participated. Patients received 10 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS to the left temporal area overlying auditory cortex with or without neuronavigation. The main outcome measures were VAS scores for tinnitus intensity, annoyance, and distress, and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) immediately and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The mean tinnitus intensity (hierarchical linear mixed model: F(3) = 7.34, p = .0006), annoyance (F(3) = 4.45, p = .0093), distress (F(3) = 5.04, p = .0051), and THI scores (F(4) = 17.30, p < .0001) decreased in both groups with non-significant differences between the groups, except for tinnitus intensity (F(3) = 2.96, p = .0451) favoring the non-navigated rTMS. Reduction in THI scores persisted for up to 6 months in both groups. Cohen’s d for tinnitus intensity ranged between 0.33 and 0.47 in navigated rTMS and between 0.55 and 1.07 in non-navigated rTMS. The responder rates for VAS or THI ranged between 35% and 85% with no differences between groups (p = .054–1.0). In conclusion, rTMS was effective for chronic tinnitus, but the method of coil localization was not a critical factor for the treatment outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63273272019-01-22 Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study Sahlsten, Hanna Holm, Anu Rauhala, Esa Takala, Mari Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Karukivi, Max Nikkilä, Johanna Ylitalo, Kirsi Paavola, Janika Johansson, Reijo Taiminen, Tero Jääskeläinen, Satu K. Trends Hear Innovations in Tinnitus Research Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown variable effect on tinnitus. A prospective, randomized 6-month follow-up study on parallel groups was conducted to compare the effects of neuronavigated rTMS to non-navigated rTMS in chronic tinnitus. Forty patients (20 men, 20 women), mean age of 52.9 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.7), with a mean tinnitus duration of 5.8 years (SD = 3.2) and a mean tinnitus intensity of 62.2/100 (SD = 12.8) on Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0–100) participated. Patients received 10 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS to the left temporal area overlying auditory cortex with or without neuronavigation. The main outcome measures were VAS scores for tinnitus intensity, annoyance, and distress, and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) immediately and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The mean tinnitus intensity (hierarchical linear mixed model: F(3) = 7.34, p = .0006), annoyance (F(3) = 4.45, p = .0093), distress (F(3) = 5.04, p = .0051), and THI scores (F(4) = 17.30, p < .0001) decreased in both groups with non-significant differences between the groups, except for tinnitus intensity (F(3) = 2.96, p = .0451) favoring the non-navigated rTMS. Reduction in THI scores persisted for up to 6 months in both groups. Cohen’s d for tinnitus intensity ranged between 0.33 and 0.47 in navigated rTMS and between 0.55 and 1.07 in non-navigated rTMS. The responder rates for VAS or THI ranged between 35% and 85% with no differences between groups (p = .054–1.0). In conclusion, rTMS was effective for chronic tinnitus, but the method of coil localization was not a critical factor for the treatment outcome. SAGE Publications 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6327327/ /pubmed/30803387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216518822198 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Innovations in Tinnitus Research
Sahlsten, Hanna
Holm, Anu
Rauhala, Esa
Takala, Mari
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Karukivi, Max
Nikkilä, Johanna
Ylitalo, Kirsi
Paavola, Janika
Johansson, Reijo
Taiminen, Tero
Jääskeläinen, Satu K.
Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study
title Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study
title_full Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study
title_fullStr Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study
title_short Neuronavigated Versus Non-navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Study
title_sort neuronavigated versus non-navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic tinnitus: a randomized study
topic Innovations in Tinnitus Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30803387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216518822198
work_keys_str_mv AT sahlstenhanna neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT holmanu neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT rauhalaesa neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT takalamari neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT loyttyniemieliisa neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT karukivimax neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT nikkilajohanna neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT ylitalokirsi neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT paavolajanika neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT johanssonreijo neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT taiminentero neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy
AT jaaskelainensatuk neuronavigatedversusnonnavigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationforchronictinnitusarandomizedstudy