Cargando…

Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination

BACKGROUND: Understanding reasons for and against vaccination from the parental perspective is critical for designing vaccination campaigns and informing other interventions to increase vaccination uptake in Canada. The objective of this study was to understand maternal vaccination decision making f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNeil, Deborah A., Mueller, Melissa, MacDonald, Shannon, McDonald, Sheila, Saini, Vineet, Kellner, James D., Tough, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6338-0
_version_ 1783386453975236608
author McNeil, Deborah A.
Mueller, Melissa
MacDonald, Shannon
McDonald, Sheila
Saini, Vineet
Kellner, James D.
Tough, Suzanne
author_facet McNeil, Deborah A.
Mueller, Melissa
MacDonald, Shannon
McDonald, Sheila
Saini, Vineet
Kellner, James D.
Tough, Suzanne
author_sort McNeil, Deborah A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding reasons for and against vaccination from the parental perspective is critical for designing vaccination campaigns and informing other interventions to increase vaccination uptake in Canada. The objective of this study was to understand maternal vaccination decision making for children. METHODS: Mothers participating in a longitudinal community-based pregnancy cohort, the All Our Babies study in Calgary, Alberta, completed open-ended survey questions providing explanations for the vaccination status of their child by 24 months postpartum. Qualitative responses were linked to administrative vaccination records to examine survey responses and recorded child vaccination status. RESULTS: There were 1560 open-ended responses available; 89% (n = 1391) provided explanations for vaccinating their children, 5% (n = 79) provided explanations for not vaccinating/delaying, and 6% (n = 90) provided explanations for both. Themes were similar for those vaccinating and not vaccinating/delaying; however, interpretations were different. Two broad themes were identified: Sources of influence and Deliberative Processes. Sources of influence on decision making included personal, family, and external experiences. Deliberative Processes included risk, research, effectiveness, and balancing risks/benefits. Under Deliberative Processes, responsibility was a category for those vaccinating; while choice, instrumental/practical, and health issues were categories for those not vaccinating/delaying. Mothers’ levels of conviction and motivation provided a Context for understanding their decision making perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination decision making is complex and impacted by many factors that are similar but contribute to different decisions depending on mothers’ perspectives. The results of this study indicate the need to examine new intervention approaches to increase uptake that recognize and address feelings of pressure and parental commitment to choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63273852019-01-15 Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination McNeil, Deborah A. Mueller, Melissa MacDonald, Shannon McDonald, Sheila Saini, Vineet Kellner, James D. Tough, Suzanne BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding reasons for and against vaccination from the parental perspective is critical for designing vaccination campaigns and informing other interventions to increase vaccination uptake in Canada. The objective of this study was to understand maternal vaccination decision making for children. METHODS: Mothers participating in a longitudinal community-based pregnancy cohort, the All Our Babies study in Calgary, Alberta, completed open-ended survey questions providing explanations for the vaccination status of their child by 24 months postpartum. Qualitative responses were linked to administrative vaccination records to examine survey responses and recorded child vaccination status. RESULTS: There were 1560 open-ended responses available; 89% (n = 1391) provided explanations for vaccinating their children, 5% (n = 79) provided explanations for not vaccinating/delaying, and 6% (n = 90) provided explanations for both. Themes were similar for those vaccinating and not vaccinating/delaying; however, interpretations were different. Two broad themes were identified: Sources of influence and Deliberative Processes. Sources of influence on decision making included personal, family, and external experiences. Deliberative Processes included risk, research, effectiveness, and balancing risks/benefits. Under Deliberative Processes, responsibility was a category for those vaccinating; while choice, instrumental/practical, and health issues were categories for those not vaccinating/delaying. Mothers’ levels of conviction and motivation provided a Context for understanding their decision making perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination decision making is complex and impacted by many factors that are similar but contribute to different decisions depending on mothers’ perspectives. The results of this study indicate the need to examine new intervention approaches to increase uptake that recognize and address feelings of pressure and parental commitment to choice. BioMed Central 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6327385/ /pubmed/30630511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6338-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McNeil, Deborah A.
Mueller, Melissa
MacDonald, Shannon
McDonald, Sheila
Saini, Vineet
Kellner, James D.
Tough, Suzanne
Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
title Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
title_full Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
title_fullStr Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
title_full_unstemmed Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
title_short Maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
title_sort maternal perceptions of childhood vaccination: explanations of reasons for and against vaccination
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6338-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mcneildeboraha maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination
AT muellermelissa maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination
AT macdonaldshannon maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination
AT mcdonaldsheila maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination
AT sainivineet maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination
AT kellnerjamesd maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination
AT toughsuzanne maternalperceptionsofchildhoodvaccinationexplanationsofreasonsforandagainstvaccination