Cargando…

Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center

BACKGROUND: With few exceptions the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for diagnoses and official coding guidelines do not distinguish pre-existing conditions from complications or comorbidities which occur during hospitalization. However, information on diagnosis timin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Triep, Karen, Beck, Thomas, Donzé, Jacques, Endrich, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3
_version_ 1783386460837117952
author Triep, Karen
Beck, Thomas
Donzé, Jacques
Endrich, Olga
author_facet Triep, Karen
Beck, Thomas
Donzé, Jacques
Endrich, Olga
author_sort Triep, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With few exceptions the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for diagnoses and official coding guidelines do not distinguish pre-existing conditions from complications or comorbidities which occur during hospitalization. However, information on diagnosis timing is relevant with regard to the case’s severity, resource consumption and quality of care. In this study we analyzed the diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission (POA) indicator using routinely collected health data. METHODS: We included all inpatient cases of the department of medicine during 2016 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, decubitus ulcer or delirium. Swiss coding guidelines of 2016 and the definitions of the Swiss medical statistics of hospitals were analyzed to evaluate the potential to encode information on diagnosis timing. The diagnoses were revised by applying the information present-on-admission by a coding specialist and by a medical expert, serving as Gold Standard. The diagnostic value and reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability for POA of all diagnoses was 0.7133 (Cohen’s kappa), but differed between diagnosis groups (0.558–0.7164). The rate of POA positive of the total applied by the coding specialist versus the expert was similar, but differed between diagnoses. In group “thrombosis” SEN was 0.95, SPE 0.75, PPV 0.97 and NPV 0.60, in group “decubitus ulcer” SEN 0.89, SPE 0.82, PPV 0.89 and NPV 0.82, in group “delirium” SEN 0.91, SPE 0.65, PPV 0.71 and NPV 0.88 For all diagnoses SEN 0.92, SPE 0.73, PPV 0.87, NPV 0.82, summing up the cases of all diagnosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coding the POA indicator identified diagnoses which were pre-existent with insufficient reliability on individual patient’s level. The overall fair to sufficient diagnostic quality is appropriate for screening and benchmarking performance on population level. As the medical statistics of hospitals carries no variable on pre-existing conditions, the novel approach to apply the POA indicator to diagnoses gives more information on quality of hospital care and complexity of cases. By preparing documentation for POA reporting diagnostic quality must be increased before implementation for risk-assessment or reimbursement on the individual patient’s level. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63274142019-01-15 Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center Triep, Karen Beck, Thomas Donzé, Jacques Endrich, Olga BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: With few exceptions the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for diagnoses and official coding guidelines do not distinguish pre-existing conditions from complications or comorbidities which occur during hospitalization. However, information on diagnosis timing is relevant with regard to the case’s severity, resource consumption and quality of care. In this study we analyzed the diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission (POA) indicator using routinely collected health data. METHODS: We included all inpatient cases of the department of medicine during 2016 with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, decubitus ulcer or delirium. Swiss coding guidelines of 2016 and the definitions of the Swiss medical statistics of hospitals were analyzed to evaluate the potential to encode information on diagnosis timing. The diagnoses were revised by applying the information present-on-admission by a coding specialist and by a medical expert, serving as Gold Standard. The diagnostic value and reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability for POA of all diagnoses was 0.7133 (Cohen’s kappa), but differed between diagnosis groups (0.558–0.7164). The rate of POA positive of the total applied by the coding specialist versus the expert was similar, but differed between diagnoses. In group “thrombosis” SEN was 0.95, SPE 0.75, PPV 0.97 and NPV 0.60, in group “decubitus ulcer” SEN 0.89, SPE 0.82, PPV 0.89 and NPV 0.82, in group “delirium” SEN 0.91, SPE 0.65, PPV 0.71 and NPV 0.88 For all diagnoses SEN 0.92, SPE 0.73, PPV 0.87, NPV 0.82, summing up the cases of all diagnosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Coding the POA indicator identified diagnoses which were pre-existent with insufficient reliability on individual patient’s level. The overall fair to sufficient diagnostic quality is appropriate for screening and benchmarking performance on population level. As the medical statistics of hospitals carries no variable on pre-existing conditions, the novel approach to apply the POA indicator to diagnoses gives more information on quality of hospital care and complexity of cases. By preparing documentation for POA reporting diagnostic quality must be increased before implementation for risk-assessment or reimbursement on the individual patient’s level. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6327414/ /pubmed/30626388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Triep, Karen
Beck, Thomas
Donzé, Jacques
Endrich, Olga
Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center
title Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center
title_full Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center
title_fullStr Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center
title_short Diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a Swiss tertiary care center
title_sort diagnostic value and reliability of the present-on-admission indicator in different diagnosis groups: pilot study at a swiss tertiary care center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3858-3
work_keys_str_mv AT triepkaren diagnosticvalueandreliabilityofthepresentonadmissionindicatorindifferentdiagnosisgroupspilotstudyataswisstertiarycarecenter
AT beckthomas diagnosticvalueandreliabilityofthepresentonadmissionindicatorindifferentdiagnosisgroupspilotstudyataswisstertiarycarecenter
AT donzejacques diagnosticvalueandreliabilityofthepresentonadmissionindicatorindifferentdiagnosisgroupspilotstudyataswisstertiarycarecenter
AT endricholga diagnosticvalueandreliabilityofthepresentonadmissionindicatorindifferentdiagnosisgroupspilotstudyataswisstertiarycarecenter