Cargando…
The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from chronic, subjective tinnitus are on a quest to find a cure or any form of alleviation for their persistent complaint. Current recommended therapy forms provide psychotherapeutic interventions that are intended to train the patient how to deal with the tinnitus sou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3121-6 |
_version_ | 1783386470964264960 |
---|---|
author | Luyten, Tine Van de Heyning, Paul Jacquemin, Laure Van Looveren, Nancy Declau, Frank Fransen, Erik Gilles, Annick |
author_facet | Luyten, Tine Van de Heyning, Paul Jacquemin, Laure Van Looveren, Nancy Declau, Frank Fransen, Erik Gilles, Annick |
author_sort | Luyten, Tine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from chronic, subjective tinnitus are on a quest to find a cure or any form of alleviation for their persistent complaint. Current recommended therapy forms provide psychotherapeutic interventions that are intended to train the patient how to deal with the tinnitus sound. Pharmaceutical managements are used to reduce secondary effects of the tinnitus sound such as sleep deprivation, emotional and concentration difficulties, but these treatments do not cure the tinnitus. Recent studies have shown that Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) significantly improves the quality of life for tinnitus patients. Furthermore, several studies have reported that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) relieves a substantial amount of distress by changing dysfunctional cognitions. However, when the tinnitus causes great interference with daily functioning, these treatment methods are not always sufficiently effective. Recent insights show that Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR) is a highly effective therapy for medically unexplained symptoms such as chronic pain and phantom pain. In scientific research, tinnitus is compared to phantom limb pain. Starting from tinnitus as a phantom percept we therefore aim to demonstrate that the operating mechanisms of EMDR may also be an effective treatment method for patients with subjective tinnitus. The aim of this randomized controlled study with blind evaluator is to examine the effect of EMDR compared to CBT in chronic tinnitus patients. To our knowledge, there are no other studies that evaluate both methods simultaneously. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 166 patients with subjective, chronic, non-pulsatile tinnitus will be randomized in two treatment groups: TRT + CBT versus TRT + EMDR. The experimental group will receive the bimodal therapy TRT/EMDR and the active control group will receive the bimodal therapy TRT/CBT. Evaluations will take place at baseline before therapy, at the end of the treatment and 3 months after therapy. The score on the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) will be used as the primary outcome measurement. Secondary outcome measurements are the Visual Analogue Scale of Loudness (VAS), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), psychoacoustic measurements and event-related potentials (ERP). DISCUSSION: The objective is to evaluate whether the bimodal therapy TRT and EMDR can provide faster and/or more relief from the annoyance experienced in chronic tinnitus patients’ daily lives compared to the bimodal therapy TRT and CBT. So far there has been no prospective, randomized controlled, clinical trial with blind evaluator that compares CBT and EMDR as a treatment for tinnitus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03114878. April 14, 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3121-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6327461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63274612019-01-15 The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Luyten, Tine Van de Heyning, Paul Jacquemin, Laure Van Looveren, Nancy Declau, Frank Fransen, Erik Gilles, Annick Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients suffering from chronic, subjective tinnitus are on a quest to find a cure or any form of alleviation for their persistent complaint. Current recommended therapy forms provide psychotherapeutic interventions that are intended to train the patient how to deal with the tinnitus sound. Pharmaceutical managements are used to reduce secondary effects of the tinnitus sound such as sleep deprivation, emotional and concentration difficulties, but these treatments do not cure the tinnitus. Recent studies have shown that Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) significantly improves the quality of life for tinnitus patients. Furthermore, several studies have reported that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) relieves a substantial amount of distress by changing dysfunctional cognitions. However, when the tinnitus causes great interference with daily functioning, these treatment methods are not always sufficiently effective. Recent insights show that Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing (EMDR) is a highly effective therapy for medically unexplained symptoms such as chronic pain and phantom pain. In scientific research, tinnitus is compared to phantom limb pain. Starting from tinnitus as a phantom percept we therefore aim to demonstrate that the operating mechanisms of EMDR may also be an effective treatment method for patients with subjective tinnitus. The aim of this randomized controlled study with blind evaluator is to examine the effect of EMDR compared to CBT in chronic tinnitus patients. To our knowledge, there are no other studies that evaluate both methods simultaneously. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 166 patients with subjective, chronic, non-pulsatile tinnitus will be randomized in two treatment groups: TRT + CBT versus TRT + EMDR. The experimental group will receive the bimodal therapy TRT/EMDR and the active control group will receive the bimodal therapy TRT/CBT. Evaluations will take place at baseline before therapy, at the end of the treatment and 3 months after therapy. The score on the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) will be used as the primary outcome measurement. Secondary outcome measurements are the Visual Analogue Scale of Loudness (VAS), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), psychoacoustic measurements and event-related potentials (ERP). DISCUSSION: The objective is to evaluate whether the bimodal therapy TRT and EMDR can provide faster and/or more relief from the annoyance experienced in chronic tinnitus patients’ daily lives compared to the bimodal therapy TRT and CBT. So far there has been no prospective, randomized controlled, clinical trial with blind evaluator that compares CBT and EMDR as a treatment for tinnitus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03114878. April 14, 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3121-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6327461/ /pubmed/30626414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3121-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Luyten, Tine Van de Heyning, Paul Jacquemin, Laure Van Looveren, Nancy Declau, Frank Fransen, Erik Gilles, Annick The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The value of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | value of eye movement desensitization reprocessing in the treatment of tinnitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3121-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luytentine thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandeheyningpaul thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jacqueminlaure thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanlooverennancy thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT declaufrank thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fransenerik thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gillesannick thevalueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luytentine valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandeheyningpaul valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jacqueminlaure valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanlooverennancy valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT declaufrank valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fransenerik valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gillesannick valueofeyemovementdesensitizationreprocessinginthetreatmentoftinnitusstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |