Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Currently, the major treatment modalities of advanced melanoma are immune check point and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors. As lacking head-to-head randomizedcontrolled trials (RCTs) comparing immune check point and MAPK pathway inhibitors, we evaluated the effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: An, Qing, Liu, Zhihao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5259-8
_version_ 1783386476610846720
author An, Qing
Liu, Zhihao
author_facet An, Qing
Liu, Zhihao
author_sort An, Qing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, the major treatment modalities of advanced melanoma are immune check point and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors. As lacking head-to-head randomizedcontrolled trials (RCTs) comparing immune check point and MAPK pathway inhibitors, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity with different treatment combinations of immune check point or MAPK pathway inhibitors for advanced melanoma by network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched for RCTs in Pubmed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials through March 2017. Two reviewers performed a network meta-analysis by assessing the hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as by evaluating serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible RCTs involving 10,951 patients assigned to 11 treatment modalities were included. The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors demonstrated an improved OS benefit compared with all the other treatments except programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) blockade because the difference in OS between the BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination and PD-1 blockade (HR: 0.85; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.59, 1.21) was not significant. For PFS, the BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination showed a significant advantage compared with other treatments apart from the combination of PD-1/L1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4(CTLA-4) blockade (HR:0.61; 95% CrI: 0.30, 1.25). The MEK inhibitor combined with chemotherapy was associated with the highest risk of SAEs (HR: 1.76 95% CrI: 1.21, 2.48). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors exhibited a survival advantage in OS and PFS and comparable risk of toxicity compared with chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5259-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63274852019-01-15 Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis An, Qing Liu, Zhihao BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Currently, the major treatment modalities of advanced melanoma are immune check point and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors. As lacking head-to-head randomizedcontrolled trials (RCTs) comparing immune check point and MAPK pathway inhibitors, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity with different treatment combinations of immune check point or MAPK pathway inhibitors for advanced melanoma by network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched for RCTs in Pubmed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials through March 2017. Two reviewers performed a network meta-analysis by assessing the hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as by evaluating serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible RCTs involving 10,951 patients assigned to 11 treatment modalities were included. The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors demonstrated an improved OS benefit compared with all the other treatments except programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1) blockade because the difference in OS between the BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination and PD-1 blockade (HR: 0.85; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.59, 1.21) was not significant. For PFS, the BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination showed a significant advantage compared with other treatments apart from the combination of PD-1/L1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4(CTLA-4) blockade (HR:0.61; 95% CrI: 0.30, 1.25). The MEK inhibitor combined with chemotherapy was associated with the highest risk of SAEs (HR: 1.76 95% CrI: 1.21, 2.48). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors exhibited a survival advantage in OS and PFS and comparable risk of toxicity compared with chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5259-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6327485/ /pubmed/30626368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5259-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
An, Qing
Liu, Zhihao
Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30626368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5259-8
work_keys_str_mv AT anqing comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcombinationtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaanetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuzhihao comparativeefficacyandsafetyofcombinationtherapiesforadvancedmelanomaanetworkmetaanalysis