Cargando…
Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application
BACKGROUND: We developed Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a web-based application designed to facilitate symptom screening by children receiving cancer treatments and access to supportive care clinical practice guidelines primarily by healthcare provid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0715-6 |
_version_ | 1783386480189636608 |
---|---|
author | Cook, Sadie Vettese, Emily Soman, Dilip Hyslop, Shannon Kuczynski, Susan Spiegler, Brenda Davis, Hailey Duong, Nathan Ou Wai, Stacee Golabek, Robert Golabek, Patryk Antoszek-Rallo, Adam Schechter, Tal Lee Dupuis, L. Sung, Lillian |
author_facet | Cook, Sadie Vettese, Emily Soman, Dilip Hyslop, Shannon Kuczynski, Susan Spiegler, Brenda Davis, Hailey Duong, Nathan Ou Wai, Stacee Golabek, Robert Golabek, Patryk Antoszek-Rallo, Adam Schechter, Tal Lee Dupuis, L. Sung, Lillian |
author_sort | Cook, Sadie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We developed Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a web-based application designed to facilitate symptom screening by children receiving cancer treatments and access to supportive care clinical practice guidelines primarily by healthcare providers. The objective was to describe the initial development and evaluation of SPARK from the perspective of children. IMPLEMENTATION: Development and evaluation occurred in three phases: (1) low fidelity focused on functionality, (2) design focused on “look and feel” and (3) high fidelity confirmed functionality and design. Cognitive interviews were conducted with children receiving cancer treatments 8–18 years of age. Evaluation occurred after every five interviews and changes were guided by a Review Panel. Quantitative evaluation included SPARK ease of use and understandability of SPARK reports. RESULTS: The number of children included by phase were: low fidelity (n = 30), design (n = 30) and high fidelity (n = 30). Across phases, the median age was 13.2 (range 8.5 to 18.4) years. During low-fidelity and design phases, iterative refinements to SPARK improved website navigation, usability and likability from the perspective of children and established symptom report design. Among the last 10 children enrolled to high-fidelity testing, all (100%) understood how to complete symptom screening, access reports and interpret reports. Among these 10 respondents, all (100%) found SPARK easy to use and 9 (90%) found SPARK reports were easy to understand. CONCLUSIONS: SPARK is a web-based application which is usable and understandable, and it is now appropriate to use for research. Future efforts will focus on clinical implementation of SPARK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6327501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63275012019-01-15 Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application Cook, Sadie Vettese, Emily Soman, Dilip Hyslop, Shannon Kuczynski, Susan Spiegler, Brenda Davis, Hailey Duong, Nathan Ou Wai, Stacee Golabek, Robert Golabek, Patryk Antoszek-Rallo, Adam Schechter, Tal Lee Dupuis, L. Sung, Lillian BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Software BACKGROUND: We developed Supportive care Prioritization, Assessment and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a web-based application designed to facilitate symptom screening by children receiving cancer treatments and access to supportive care clinical practice guidelines primarily by healthcare providers. The objective was to describe the initial development and evaluation of SPARK from the perspective of children. IMPLEMENTATION: Development and evaluation occurred in three phases: (1) low fidelity focused on functionality, (2) design focused on “look and feel” and (3) high fidelity confirmed functionality and design. Cognitive interviews were conducted with children receiving cancer treatments 8–18 years of age. Evaluation occurred after every five interviews and changes were guided by a Review Panel. Quantitative evaluation included SPARK ease of use and understandability of SPARK reports. RESULTS: The number of children included by phase were: low fidelity (n = 30), design (n = 30) and high fidelity (n = 30). Across phases, the median age was 13.2 (range 8.5 to 18.4) years. During low-fidelity and design phases, iterative refinements to SPARK improved website navigation, usability and likability from the perspective of children and established symptom report design. Among the last 10 children enrolled to high-fidelity testing, all (100%) understood how to complete symptom screening, access reports and interpret reports. Among these 10 respondents, all (100%) found SPARK easy to use and 9 (90%) found SPARK reports were easy to understand. CONCLUSIONS: SPARK is a web-based application which is usable and understandable, and it is now appropriate to use for research. Future efforts will focus on clinical implementation of SPARK. BioMed Central 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6327501/ /pubmed/30630480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0715-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Software Cook, Sadie Vettese, Emily Soman, Dilip Hyslop, Shannon Kuczynski, Susan Spiegler, Brenda Davis, Hailey Duong, Nathan Ou Wai, Stacee Golabek, Robert Golabek, Patryk Antoszek-Rallo, Adam Schechter, Tal Lee Dupuis, L. Sung, Lillian Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application |
title | Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application |
title_full | Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application |
title_fullStr | Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application |
title_short | Initial development of Supportive care Assessment, Prioritization and Recommendations for Kids (SPARK), a symptom screening and management application |
title_sort | initial development of supportive care assessment, prioritization and recommendations for kids (spark), a symptom screening and management application |
topic | Software |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0715-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cooksadie initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT vetteseemily initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT somandilip initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT hyslopshannon initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT kuczynskisusan initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT spieglerbrenda initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT davishailey initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT duongnathan initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT ouwaistacee initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT golabekrobert initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT golabekpatryk initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT antoszekralloadam initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT schechtertal initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT leedupuisl initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication AT sunglillian initialdevelopmentofsupportivecareassessmentprioritizationandrecommendationsforkidssparkasymptomscreeningandmanagementapplication |