Cargando…

Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: In Middle Europe ultrasonography is the standard method used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Our aim was to determine whether manual fixation of the child is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality. METHODS: This randomized trial was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voitl, Peter, Sebelefsky, Christian, Hosner, Sara, Woditschka, Astrid, Diesner, Susanne, Böck, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1392-z
_version_ 1783386490640793600
author Voitl, Peter
Sebelefsky, Christian
Hosner, Sara
Woditschka, Astrid
Diesner, Susanne
Böck, Andreas
author_facet Voitl, Peter
Sebelefsky, Christian
Hosner, Sara
Woditschka, Astrid
Diesner, Susanne
Böck, Andreas
author_sort Voitl, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Middle Europe ultrasonography is the standard method used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Our aim was to determine whether manual fixation of the child is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality. METHODS: This randomized trial was conducted at a free-standing general pediatric outpatient clinic in Vienna, Austria. Healthy infants in the 1st and between the 6th and 8th week of life with no hip malalignment were included. After randomization, Group 1 was examined using Graf’s fixation device and participants in Group 2 were fixated on the examination couch by their parents. In a second step, all images underwent a blinded evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 117 babies (Group 1: n = 62, Group 2: n = 54, excluded: n = 1) were examined and 230 images (Group 1: n = 122, Group 2: n = 108) were evaluated, of which 225 were sonographically normal. Two images, showing a type IIa right hip and a type IIa + left hip respectively, were excluded. One participant had to be excluded as the respective images showed two pathologic hip joints. Two images in Group 1 and three in Group 2 were not evaluable. No statistical association between image quality (11 quality criteria and overall evaluability) and fixation technique (0.12 ≤ p ≤ 1.0 or constant) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Considering sonographically normal hip joints, we found no evidence that manual fixation differed from Graf’s technique regarding image quality. In future studies, hip pathologies should be included and discomfort of infants and parents during the examination should be addressed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00015694), registered retrospectively on October 7th, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63275462019-01-15 Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial Voitl, Peter Sebelefsky, Christian Hosner, Sara Woditschka, Astrid Diesner, Susanne Böck, Andreas BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: In Middle Europe ultrasonography is the standard method used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Our aim was to determine whether manual fixation of the child is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality. METHODS: This randomized trial was conducted at a free-standing general pediatric outpatient clinic in Vienna, Austria. Healthy infants in the 1st and between the 6th and 8th week of life with no hip malalignment were included. After randomization, Group 1 was examined using Graf’s fixation device and participants in Group 2 were fixated on the examination couch by their parents. In a second step, all images underwent a blinded evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 117 babies (Group 1: n = 62, Group 2: n = 54, excluded: n = 1) were examined and 230 images (Group 1: n = 122, Group 2: n = 108) were evaluated, of which 225 were sonographically normal. Two images, showing a type IIa right hip and a type IIa + left hip respectively, were excluded. One participant had to be excluded as the respective images showed two pathologic hip joints. Two images in Group 1 and three in Group 2 were not evaluable. No statistical association between image quality (11 quality criteria and overall evaluability) and fixation technique (0.12 ≤ p ≤ 1.0 or constant) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Considering sonographically normal hip joints, we found no evidence that manual fixation differed from Graf’s technique regarding image quality. In future studies, hip pathologies should be included and discomfort of infants and parents during the examination should be addressed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00015694), registered retrospectively on October 7th, 2018. BioMed Central 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6327546/ /pubmed/30630451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1392-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Voitl, Peter
Sebelefsky, Christian
Hosner, Sara
Woditschka, Astrid
Diesner, Susanne
Böck, Andreas
Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
title Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
title_full Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
title_fullStr Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
title_short Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
title_sort ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to graf’s technique regarding image quality—a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30630451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1392-z
work_keys_str_mv AT voitlpeter ultrasoundoftheinfanthipmanualfixationisequivalenttografstechniqueregardingimagequalityarandomizedtrial
AT sebelefskychristian ultrasoundoftheinfanthipmanualfixationisequivalenttografstechniqueregardingimagequalityarandomizedtrial
AT hosnersara ultrasoundoftheinfanthipmanualfixationisequivalenttografstechniqueregardingimagequalityarandomizedtrial
AT woditschkaastrid ultrasoundoftheinfanthipmanualfixationisequivalenttografstechniqueregardingimagequalityarandomizedtrial
AT diesnersusanne ultrasoundoftheinfanthipmanualfixationisequivalenttografstechniqueregardingimagequalityarandomizedtrial
AT bockandreas ultrasoundoftheinfanthipmanualfixationisequivalenttografstechniqueregardingimagequalityarandomizedtrial