Cargando…

Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool

BACKGROUND: Lymph node status can predict the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery. Thus, we sought to establish a standard for the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined in patients with rectal cancer by evaluating the probability that pathologically negative LNs prov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Weixing, Li, Yaqi, Wu, Zhenyu, Feng, Yang, Cai, Sanjun, Xu, Ye, Li, Qingguo, Cai, Guoxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662284
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169309
_version_ 1783386560142508032
author Dai, Weixing
Li, Yaqi
Wu, Zhenyu
Feng, Yang
Cai, Sanjun
Xu, Ye
Li, Qingguo
Cai, Guoxiang
author_facet Dai, Weixing
Li, Yaqi
Wu, Zhenyu
Feng, Yang
Cai, Sanjun
Xu, Ye
Li, Qingguo
Cai, Guoxiang
author_sort Dai, Weixing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymph node status can predict the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery. Thus, we sought to establish a standard for the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined in patients with rectal cancer by evaluating the probability that pathologically negative LNs prove positive during surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We extracted information of 31,853 patients with stage I–III rectal carcinoma registered between 2004 and 2013 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and divided them into two groups: the first group was SURG, including patients receiving surgery directly and the other group was NEO, encompassing those underwent neo-adjuvant therapy. Using a beta-binomial model, we developed nodal staging score (NSS) based on pT/ypT stage and the number of LNs retrieved. RESULTS: In both cohorts, the false-negative rate was estimated to be 16% when 12 LNs were examined, but it dropped to 10% when 20 LNs were evaluated. In the SURG cohort, to rule out 90% possibility of false staging, 3, 7, 28, and 32 LNs would be necessarily examined in patients with pT1–4 disease, respectively. While in the NEO cohort, 4, 7, 12, and 16 LNs would be included for examination in patients with ypT1–4 disease to guarantee an NSS of 90%. CONCLUSION: By determining whether a rectal cancer patient with negative LNs was appropriately staged, the NSS model we developed in this study may assist in tailoring postoperative management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63278872019-01-18 Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool Dai, Weixing Li, Yaqi Wu, Zhenyu Feng, Yang Cai, Sanjun Xu, Ye Li, Qingguo Cai, Guoxiang Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Lymph node status can predict the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery. Thus, we sought to establish a standard for the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined in patients with rectal cancer by evaluating the probability that pathologically negative LNs prove positive during surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We extracted information of 31,853 patients with stage I–III rectal carcinoma registered between 2004 and 2013 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and divided them into two groups: the first group was SURG, including patients receiving surgery directly and the other group was NEO, encompassing those underwent neo-adjuvant therapy. Using a beta-binomial model, we developed nodal staging score (NSS) based on pT/ypT stage and the number of LNs retrieved. RESULTS: In both cohorts, the false-negative rate was estimated to be 16% when 12 LNs were examined, but it dropped to 10% when 20 LNs were evaluated. In the SURG cohort, to rule out 90% possibility of false staging, 3, 7, 28, and 32 LNs would be necessarily examined in patients with pT1–4 disease, respectively. While in the NEO cohort, 4, 7, 12, and 16 LNs would be included for examination in patients with ypT1–4 disease to guarantee an NSS of 90%. CONCLUSION: By determining whether a rectal cancer patient with negative LNs was appropriately staged, the NSS model we developed in this study may assist in tailoring postoperative management. Dove Medical Press 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6327887/ /pubmed/30662284 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169309 Text en © 2019 Dai et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dai, Weixing
Li, Yaqi
Wu, Zhenyu
Feng, Yang
Cai, Sanjun
Xu, Ye
Li, Qingguo
Cai, Guoxiang
Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
title Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
title_full Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
title_fullStr Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
title_full_unstemmed Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
title_short Pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
title_sort pathological nodal staging score for rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a postoperative decision tool
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662284
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169309
work_keys_str_mv AT daiweixing pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT liyaqi pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT wuzhenyu pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT fengyang pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT caisanjun pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT xuye pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT liqingguo pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool
AT caiguoxiang pathologicalnodalstagingscoreforrectalcancerpatientstreatedwithradicalsurgerywithorwithoutneoadjuvanttherapyapostoperativedecisiontool