Cargando…

Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Estimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) among chronic pain patients attending Brazilian hospitals and pain clinics in São Paulo, Ceara, and Bahia and explore clinical characteristics by subtypes: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), central neuropathic pain (CNP), chr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Udall, Margarita, Kudel, Ian, Cappelleri, Joseph C, Sadosky, Alesia, King-Concialdi, Kristen, Parsons, Bruce, Hlavacek, Patrick, Hopps, Markay, Salomon, P Arline, DiBonaventura, Marco D, Clark, Patricia, Garcia, João Batista Santos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662280
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S160504
_version_ 1783386562464055296
author Udall, Margarita
Kudel, Ian
Cappelleri, Joseph C
Sadosky, Alesia
King-Concialdi, Kristen
Parsons, Bruce
Hlavacek, Patrick
Hopps, Markay
Salomon, P Arline
DiBonaventura, Marco D
Clark, Patricia
Garcia, João Batista Santos
author_facet Udall, Margarita
Kudel, Ian
Cappelleri, Joseph C
Sadosky, Alesia
King-Concialdi, Kristen
Parsons, Bruce
Hlavacek, Patrick
Hopps, Markay
Salomon, P Arline
DiBonaventura, Marco D
Clark, Patricia
Garcia, João Batista Santos
author_sort Udall, Margarita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Estimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) among chronic pain patients attending Brazilian hospitals and pain clinics in São Paulo, Ceara, and Bahia and explore clinical characteristics by subtypes: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), central neuropathic pain (CNP), chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component (CLBP-NeP), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-traumatic neuropathic pain (PTN), and post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSN). METHODS: Physicians screened patients reporting chronic pain for ≥3 months (n=2,118) for probable NeP, using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire and physician assessment, and reported their NeP subtype(s), symptoms, and medications. Identified NeP patients completed a questionnaire including treatment experiences, quality of life EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]), pain severity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scales. Descriptive analyses were performed by NeP subtype. RESULTS: The prevalence of probable NeP was 14.5% (n=307). NeP patients were mostly female (80.5%), middle-aged (mean [M]=52.5, SD=13.9), and Pardo (44.3%). Of those diagnosed with an NeP subtype (n=209), the largest proportions were CLBP-NeP (36.8%), followed by pDPN (18.7%), CNP (17.7%), PTN (17.2%), PSN (13.4%), and PHN (3.3%). Across subtypes, the most widely reported symptoms were numbness (range: 62.2%–89.7%) and hyperalgesia (range: 32.1%–76.9%) and the most commonly prescribed pain analgesics were NSAID (range: 18.2%–57.1%), opioids (range: 0.0%–39.3%), and antiepileptics (range: 18.2%–57.1%). PTN and PSN patients reported the least favorable EQ-5D index scores (M=0.42, SD=0.19) and BPI-Pain Severity scores (M=7.0, SD=1.9), respectively. Those diagnosed with CNP had the least favorable BPI-Pain Interference scores (M=6.0, SD=2.7). Patients with PHN reported the least impairment based on EQ-5D index scores (M=0.60, SD=0.04). Those with pDPN had the most favorable BPI scores (BPI-Pain Severity: M=4.6, SD=2.3; BPI-Pain Interference: M=4.7, SD=2.7). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of chronic pain patients in Brazil yielded a 14.5% probable NeP prevalence. NSAIDs and opioids were commonly used, and there was a high incidence of NeP-related symptoms with varying levels of dysfunction across subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6327897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63278972019-01-18 Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil Udall, Margarita Kudel, Ian Cappelleri, Joseph C Sadosky, Alesia King-Concialdi, Kristen Parsons, Bruce Hlavacek, Patrick Hopps, Markay Salomon, P Arline DiBonaventura, Marco D Clark, Patricia Garcia, João Batista Santos J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVES: Estimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) among chronic pain patients attending Brazilian hospitals and pain clinics in São Paulo, Ceara, and Bahia and explore clinical characteristics by subtypes: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), central neuropathic pain (CNP), chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component (CLBP-NeP), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-traumatic neuropathic pain (PTN), and post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSN). METHODS: Physicians screened patients reporting chronic pain for ≥3 months (n=2,118) for probable NeP, using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire and physician assessment, and reported their NeP subtype(s), symptoms, and medications. Identified NeP patients completed a questionnaire including treatment experiences, quality of life EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]), pain severity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scales. Descriptive analyses were performed by NeP subtype. RESULTS: The prevalence of probable NeP was 14.5% (n=307). NeP patients were mostly female (80.5%), middle-aged (mean [M]=52.5, SD=13.9), and Pardo (44.3%). Of those diagnosed with an NeP subtype (n=209), the largest proportions were CLBP-NeP (36.8%), followed by pDPN (18.7%), CNP (17.7%), PTN (17.2%), PSN (13.4%), and PHN (3.3%). Across subtypes, the most widely reported symptoms were numbness (range: 62.2%–89.7%) and hyperalgesia (range: 32.1%–76.9%) and the most commonly prescribed pain analgesics were NSAID (range: 18.2%–57.1%), opioids (range: 0.0%–39.3%), and antiepileptics (range: 18.2%–57.1%). PTN and PSN patients reported the least favorable EQ-5D index scores (M=0.42, SD=0.19) and BPI-Pain Severity scores (M=7.0, SD=1.9), respectively. Those diagnosed with CNP had the least favorable BPI-Pain Interference scores (M=6.0, SD=2.7). Patients with PHN reported the least impairment based on EQ-5D index scores (M=0.60, SD=0.04). Those with pDPN had the most favorable BPI scores (BPI-Pain Severity: M=4.6, SD=2.3; BPI-Pain Interference: M=4.7, SD=2.7). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of chronic pain patients in Brazil yielded a 14.5% probable NeP prevalence. NSAIDs and opioids were commonly used, and there was a high incidence of NeP-related symptoms with varying levels of dysfunction across subtypes. Dove Medical Press 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6327897/ /pubmed/30662280 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S160504 Text en © 2019 Udall et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Udall, Margarita
Kudel, Ian
Cappelleri, Joseph C
Sadosky, Alesia
King-Concialdi, Kristen
Parsons, Bruce
Hlavacek, Patrick
Hopps, Markay
Salomon, P Arline
DiBonaventura, Marco D
Clark, Patricia
Garcia, João Batista Santos
Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil
title Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil
title_full Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil
title_fullStr Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil
title_short Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil
title_sort epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in brazil
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662280
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S160504
work_keys_str_mv AT udallmargarita epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT kudelian epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT cappellerijosephc epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT sadoskyalesia epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT kingconcialdikristen epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT parsonsbruce epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT hlavacekpatrick epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT hoppsmarkay epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT salomonparline epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT dibonaventuramarcod epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT clarkpatricia epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil
AT garciajoaobatistasantos epidemiologyofphysiciandiagnosedneuropathicpaininbrazil