Cargando…

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas

OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) is systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin. A previous meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the superiority of single-agent doxorubicin over doxorubicin-based combination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Kazuhiro, Kawano, Masanori, Iwasaki, Tatsuya, Itonaga, Ichiro, Tsumura, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210671
_version_ 1783386616864178176
author Tanaka, Kazuhiro
Kawano, Masanori
Iwasaki, Tatsuya
Itonaga, Ichiro
Tsumura, Hiroshi
author_facet Tanaka, Kazuhiro
Kawano, Masanori
Iwasaki, Tatsuya
Itonaga, Ichiro
Tsumura, Hiroshi
author_sort Tanaka, Kazuhiro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) is systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin. A previous meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the superiority of single-agent doxorubicin over doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy for ASTS. However, meta-analyses of all RCTs that compare doxorubicin to other single-agent or combination regimens as first-line treatments for ASTS are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of current primary treatments for ASTS. METHODS: Eligible studies were RCTs of first-line chemotherapies for ASTS comparing doxorubicin alone to other single agents or to combination therapies (experimental arm). Data from studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled. Other time-to-event endpoints were extracted from the studies based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, and pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eligible RCTs comprising 6156 patients were identified. Overall, the 1-year OS (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99, P = 0.03) was significantly improved in the experimental arm over the doxorubicin-only arm; however, there was no significant difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73–1.03, P = 0.11) or OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.03, P = 0.28) between the two groups. PFS and other time-to-event endpoints were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. While incidences of overall severe adverse events were not significantly different (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.88–1.65, P = 0.26), severe nausea/vomiting was significantly more frequent in the experimental arm (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.27–2.83, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The efficacies of doxorubicin-only and experimental arm regimens were similar, although toxicities were more frequent in the experimental arms. Hence, doxorubicin monotherapy remains suitable as a standard first-line regimen for ASTS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6328231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63282312019-02-01 A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas Tanaka, Kazuhiro Kawano, Masanori Iwasaki, Tatsuya Itonaga, Ichiro Tsumura, Hiroshi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) is systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin. A previous meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the superiority of single-agent doxorubicin over doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy for ASTS. However, meta-analyses of all RCTs that compare doxorubicin to other single-agent or combination regimens as first-line treatments for ASTS are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of current primary treatments for ASTS. METHODS: Eligible studies were RCTs of first-line chemotherapies for ASTS comparing doxorubicin alone to other single agents or to combination therapies (experimental arm). Data from studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled. Other time-to-event endpoints were extracted from the studies based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, and pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eligible RCTs comprising 6156 patients were identified. Overall, the 1-year OS (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99, P = 0.03) was significantly improved in the experimental arm over the doxorubicin-only arm; however, there was no significant difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73–1.03, P = 0.11) or OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.03, P = 0.28) between the two groups. PFS and other time-to-event endpoints were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. While incidences of overall severe adverse events were not significantly different (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.88–1.65, P = 0.26), severe nausea/vomiting was significantly more frequent in the experimental arm (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.27–2.83, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The efficacies of doxorubicin-only and experimental arm regimens were similar, although toxicities were more frequent in the experimental arms. Hence, doxorubicin monotherapy remains suitable as a standard first-line regimen for ASTS. Public Library of Science 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6328231/ /pubmed/30629708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210671 Text en © 2019 Tanaka et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanaka, Kazuhiro
Kawano, Masanori
Iwasaki, Tatsuya
Itonaga, Ichiro
Tsumura, Hiroshi
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
title A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
title_full A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
title_short A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
title_sort meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210671
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakakazuhiro ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT kawanomasanori ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT iwasakitatsuya ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT itonagaichiro ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT tsumurahiroshi ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT tanakakazuhiro metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT kawanomasanori metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT iwasakitatsuya metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT itonagaichiro metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas
AT tsumurahiroshi metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas