Cargando…
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas
OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) is systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin. A previous meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the superiority of single-agent doxorubicin over doxorubicin-based combination...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210671 |
_version_ | 1783386616864178176 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Kazuhiro Kawano, Masanori Iwasaki, Tatsuya Itonaga, Ichiro Tsumura, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Tanaka, Kazuhiro Kawano, Masanori Iwasaki, Tatsuya Itonaga, Ichiro Tsumura, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Tanaka, Kazuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) is systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin. A previous meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the superiority of single-agent doxorubicin over doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy for ASTS. However, meta-analyses of all RCTs that compare doxorubicin to other single-agent or combination regimens as first-line treatments for ASTS are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of current primary treatments for ASTS. METHODS: Eligible studies were RCTs of first-line chemotherapies for ASTS comparing doxorubicin alone to other single agents or to combination therapies (experimental arm). Data from studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled. Other time-to-event endpoints were extracted from the studies based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, and pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eligible RCTs comprising 6156 patients were identified. Overall, the 1-year OS (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99, P = 0.03) was significantly improved in the experimental arm over the doxorubicin-only arm; however, there was no significant difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73–1.03, P = 0.11) or OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.03, P = 0.28) between the two groups. PFS and other time-to-event endpoints were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. While incidences of overall severe adverse events were not significantly different (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.88–1.65, P = 0.26), severe nausea/vomiting was significantly more frequent in the experimental arm (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.27–2.83, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The efficacies of doxorubicin-only and experimental arm regimens were similar, although toxicities were more frequent in the experimental arms. Hence, doxorubicin monotherapy remains suitable as a standard first-line regimen for ASTS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6328231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63282312019-02-01 A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas Tanaka, Kazuhiro Kawano, Masanori Iwasaki, Tatsuya Itonaga, Ichiro Tsumura, Hiroshi PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) is systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin. A previous meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the superiority of single-agent doxorubicin over doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy for ASTS. However, meta-analyses of all RCTs that compare doxorubicin to other single-agent or combination regimens as first-line treatments for ASTS are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of current primary treatments for ASTS. METHODS: Eligible studies were RCTs of first-line chemotherapies for ASTS comparing doxorubicin alone to other single agents or to combination therapies (experimental arm). Data from studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled. Other time-to-event endpoints were extracted from the studies based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, and pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eligible RCTs comprising 6156 patients were identified. Overall, the 1-year OS (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99, P = 0.03) was significantly improved in the experimental arm over the doxorubicin-only arm; however, there was no significant difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73–1.03, P = 0.11) or OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.03, P = 0.28) between the two groups. PFS and other time-to-event endpoints were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. While incidences of overall severe adverse events were not significantly different (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.88–1.65, P = 0.26), severe nausea/vomiting was significantly more frequent in the experimental arm (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.27–2.83, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The efficacies of doxorubicin-only and experimental arm regimens were similar, although toxicities were more frequent in the experimental arms. Hence, doxorubicin monotherapy remains suitable as a standard first-line regimen for ASTS. Public Library of Science 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6328231/ /pubmed/30629708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210671 Text en © 2019 Tanaka et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tanaka, Kazuhiro Kawano, Masanori Iwasaki, Tatsuya Itonaga, Ichiro Tsumura, Hiroshi A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
title | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
title_full | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
title_short | A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
title_sort | meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compare standard doxorubicin with other first-line chemotherapies for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcomas |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakakazuhiro ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT kawanomasanori ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT iwasakitatsuya ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT itonagaichiro ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT tsumurahiroshi ametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT tanakakazuhiro metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT kawanomasanori metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT iwasakitatsuya metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT itonagaichiro metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas AT tsumurahiroshi metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatcomparestandarddoxorubicinwithotherfirstlinechemotherapiesforadvancedmetastaticsofttissuesarcomas |