Cargando…

Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures

BACKGROUND: The main indications for revision of bariatric surgery are inadequate weight loss, weight regain, or complications. The objective of revision is to restore the restrictive component and/or add a malabsorptive component. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of revisional laparoscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frantzides, Constantine T., Alexander, Brad, Frantzides, Alexander T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675090
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00074
_version_ 1783386633498787840
author Frantzides, Constantine T.
Alexander, Brad
Frantzides, Alexander T.
author_facet Frantzides, Constantine T.
Alexander, Brad
Frantzides, Alexander T.
author_sort Frantzides, Constantine T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main indications for revision of bariatric surgery are inadequate weight loss, weight regain, or complications. The objective of revision is to restore the restrictive component and/or add a malabsorptive component. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of revisional laparoscopic bariatric surgery for loss of weight and assess the risks and benefits associated with these technically demanding procedures. METHODS: Revision cases performed between 2001 and 2013 were identified and grouped according to the primary procedure and type of revision. A retrospective analysis was carried out for weight loss as well as perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The total of 271 patients underwent revisional laparoscopic surgery during the study period and were categorized into four groups. Group 1 (n = 67) had an adjustable gastric band converted to gastric bypass (GBP). Group 2 (n = 128) had a dilated gastric pouch after GBP and underwent pouch reduction. Group 3 (n = 57) had a GBP and underwent pouch reduction and elongation of the biliopancreatic limb. Group 4 (n = 19) had a vertical banded gastroplasty converted to a GBP. The mean total body weight loss for Groups 1 to 4 was 35.3%, 22.9%, 39.4%, and 33.2%, respectively. The average operative times were 185, 75, 142, and 205 minutes; and the average hospitalization was 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 days, respectively. All cases were completed laparoscopically. Concomitant procedures were liver biopsy, cholecystectomy, partial gastrectomy, hiatal, ventral, and internal hernia repairs. Complication rates were 2.9%, 0%, 3.5%, and 5.2% for each of the groups and there were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Results of revisional bariatric surgery vary depending on the original procedure and the reasons for revision. In particular, if the main reason for reoperation is inadequate weight loss, then the burden is to demonstrate a surgically correctable deficiency. Revisional procedures incorporating malabsorption result in greater weight loss than gastric restriction alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6328359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63283592019-01-23 Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures Frantzides, Constantine T. Alexander, Brad Frantzides, Alexander T. JSLS Scientific Paper BACKGROUND: The main indications for revision of bariatric surgery are inadequate weight loss, weight regain, or complications. The objective of revision is to restore the restrictive component and/or add a malabsorptive component. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of revisional laparoscopic bariatric surgery for loss of weight and assess the risks and benefits associated with these technically demanding procedures. METHODS: Revision cases performed between 2001 and 2013 were identified and grouped according to the primary procedure and type of revision. A retrospective analysis was carried out for weight loss as well as perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The total of 271 patients underwent revisional laparoscopic surgery during the study period and were categorized into four groups. Group 1 (n = 67) had an adjustable gastric band converted to gastric bypass (GBP). Group 2 (n = 128) had a dilated gastric pouch after GBP and underwent pouch reduction. Group 3 (n = 57) had a GBP and underwent pouch reduction and elongation of the biliopancreatic limb. Group 4 (n = 19) had a vertical banded gastroplasty converted to a GBP. The mean total body weight loss for Groups 1 to 4 was 35.3%, 22.9%, 39.4%, and 33.2%, respectively. The average operative times were 185, 75, 142, and 205 minutes; and the average hospitalization was 1.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 days, respectively. All cases were completed laparoscopically. Concomitant procedures were liver biopsy, cholecystectomy, partial gastrectomy, hiatal, ventral, and internal hernia repairs. Complication rates were 2.9%, 0%, 3.5%, and 5.2% for each of the groups and there were no mortalities. CONCLUSION: Results of revisional bariatric surgery vary depending on the original procedure and the reasons for revision. In particular, if the main reason for reoperation is inadequate weight loss, then the burden is to demonstrate a surgically correctable deficiency. Revisional procedures incorporating malabsorption result in greater weight loss than gastric restriction alone. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6328359/ /pubmed/30675090 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00074 Text en © 2019 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Frantzides, Constantine T.
Alexander, Brad
Frantzides, Alexander T.
Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures
title Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures
title_full Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures
title_short Laparoscopic Revision of Failed Bariatric Procedures
title_sort laparoscopic revision of failed bariatric procedures
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675090
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00074
work_keys_str_mv AT frantzidesconstantinet laparoscopicrevisionoffailedbariatricprocedures
AT alexanderbrad laparoscopicrevisionoffailedbariatricprocedures
AT frantzidesalexandert laparoscopicrevisionoffailedbariatricprocedures